XJ 9E 9L SLI Thread
02-15-2011, 03:00 PM
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 310
Originally Posted by anthony210
Don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. My guess is the SLI will be handled just as most other mergers have, especially if it goes to arbitration. Which it probably will.
And again, whether they are put at the bottom of the active list or they are merged with their XJ seniority won't really change a whole lot. They will still be at the bottom.
02-16-2011, 07:32 PM
#76
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 87
My vote.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
02-16-2011, 07:34 PM
#77
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by Sturbmaster
My vote.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....ROLL TIDE!!!!
02-16-2011, 07:59 PM
#78
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: CRJ-900 CA
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Sturbmaster
My vote.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
2 for 1 method... 2 staples, 1 list. 9L first then XJ... Sorry all you fools but don't forget this is a purchase not a merge. If our union was not so kind this is how it would have been played all along. XJ did it to do us back in the day and would do the same thing again if this was the other way around and no one can deny that.
You are the vocal minority that embarrass the rest of us.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
