Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Embraer 135 returning to XJT >

Embraer 135 returning to XJT

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Embraer 135 returning to XJT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2012 | 08:23 AM
  #71  
stoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: bar stool
Default

Originally Posted by UFFL
Was wondering which companies here in the US that you have talked to prefer jet vs turboprop time?
In the particular example I recall it was jetBlue, where the guy said if he had two exactly equal candidates but with one time in jet and other in TP, he would take jet everytime. Which has taken our captains into their ranks, and many other TP drivers. But I am sure there is more then one recruiter at jetBlue.

Flying a TP is great fun and you actually get to fly. But I am starting to hear more and more that given two equal candidates, the jet guy has bigger chances.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 09:13 AM
  #72  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by stoki
In the particular example I recall it was jetBlue, where the guy said if he had two exactly equal candidates but with one time in jet and other in TP, he would take jet everytime. Which has taken our captains into their ranks, and many other TP drivers. But I am sure there is more then one recruiter at jetBlue.

Flying a TP is great fun and you actually get to fly. But I am starting to hear more and more that given two equal candidates, the jet guy has bigger chances.
Lots of former SAAB and Q drivers from Colganhave been going to JetBlue.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 09:59 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 27
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Lots of former SAAB and Q drivers from Colganhave been going to JetBlue.
Shh! Don't tell him that!

I've noticed that some of the biggest proponents of jet time are the ones who went to a regional, maybe chasing a quick upgrade, and have been stuck in the right seat of that jet for 5+ years. Perhaps trying to justify that?
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 10:55 AM
  #74  
stoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: bar stool
Default

Yea well I have been flying a TP for the past 4 years, and have heard this from our captains who have been out there interviewing and talking. Of course they are getting picked up. TP isn't discriminated against, but in the minds of some recruiters, if you're going in to fly a jet, then they want you to have jet time...

Also look at any job postings over-seas that don't require a type-rating. They all want jet time. TP time need not apply is pretty much the flavor of the month, and being that I want to get out of the ****ty U.S industry, it is frustrating and a fact I am very aware of.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 12:32 PM
  #75  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirectTo
Shh! Don't tell him that!

I've noticed that some of the biggest proponents of jet time are the ones who went to a regional, maybe chasing a quick upgrade, and have been stuck in the right seat of that jet for 5+ years. Perhaps trying to justify that?
That's funny...isn't chasing the quick upgrade the reason most people went to Colgan, even though the working conditions sucked? I'm not trying to be a tool...just keeping you honest.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 01:10 PM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 27
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlinker
That's funny...isn't chasing the quick upgrade the reason most people went to Colgan, even though the working conditions sucked? I'm not trying to be a tool...just keeping you honest.
Colgan, CommutAir, Lakes, Gulfstream, wait...all the turboprop operators.

Six one, half dozen another - we all want to get our time and get the hell out of these places.

Prop guys take the low pay in exchange for a quick upgrade (in theory), the jet guys take a longer upgrade but have better living conditions should things tank out and they get stuck. I would say there's no right or wrong way, it's just an individual risk/reward assessment.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 03:11 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by blakman7
Are you kidding? If I were a recruiter at Delta, I would hire a B1900 guy over an RJ guy any day of the week. The B1900 guy will know how to FLY the airplane because that's what they have to do with no autopilot. It's all RAW flying which would make that guy much more proficient. I'm not saying that an RJ guy doesn't know how to fly the airplane because that would simply be a lie but some RJ guys would be more apt to rely on automation rather than flying the darn airplane. I don't know who the hell told you that flying a jet takes more skill but I think that you're HIGHLY mistaken.
You're never going to get to a major with that kind of attitude. You should really consider taking the first jet job that comes your way. It takes much more skill to manage the complex systems and automation of a modern day jet than it does of a tired old turbo prop. Because of the age of most turbo props they are also not as safe.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 04:44 PM
  #78  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by blakman7
Are you kidding? If I were a recruiter at Delta, I would hire a B1900 guy over an RJ guy any day of the week. The B1900 guy will know how to FLY the airplane because that's what they have to do with no autopilot. It's all RAW flying which would make that guy much more proficient. I'm not saying that an RJ guy doesn't know how to fly the airplane because that would simply be a lie but some RJ guys would be more apt to rely on automation rather than flying the darn airplane. I don't know who the hell told you that flying a jet takes more skill but I think that you're HIGHLY mistaken.
You're never going to get to a major with that kind of attitude. You should really consider taking the first jet job that comes your way. It takes much more skill to manage the complex systems and automation of a modern day jet than it does of a tired old turbo prop. Because of the age of most turbo props they are also not as safe.
Ok, we get get it. You're trolling.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 05:14 PM
  #79  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlinker
That's funny...isn't chasing the quick upgrade the reason most people went to Colgan, even though the working conditions sucked? I'm not trying to be a tool...just keeping you honest.
Colgan, CommutAir, Lakes, Gulfstream, wait...all the turboprop operators.

Six one, half dozen another - we all want to get our time and get the hell out of these places.

Prop guys take the low pay in exchange for a quick upgrade (in theory), the jet guys take a longer upgrade but have better living conditions should things tank out and they get stuck. I would say there's no right or wrong way, it's just an individual risk/reward assessment.
DirectTo sounds pretty close to reality right there.
Reply
Old 01-16-2012 | 05:34 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Ok, we get get it. You're trolling.
Babba Booey's monkey nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
LucasM
Part 135
21
10-31-2008 02:00 PM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
FuelJetA
Part 135
11
03-12-2006 03:29 PM
Lennon
JetBlue
0
07-01-2005 07:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices