PNCL CH11 = 9L pilots are FO forever?
04-03-2012 | 02:28 PM
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Holy over estimation batman!!!
1,200?!?! How does the math on that work even in the worst case??
74 aircraft with a staffing model of 5.5 crews per aircraft = 814 pilots.
And I seriously doubt we're staffed that well. Just my $.02
1,200?!?! How does the math on that work even in the worst case??
74 aircraft with a staffing model of 5.5 crews per aircraft = 814 pilots.
And I seriously doubt we're staffed that well. Just my $.02
04-03-2012 | 02:43 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
The current spreadsheet has 591 Colgan pilots and 235 9E 900 pilots. They did say they will be evaluating staffing levels - it sounded like to me they want to run an understaffed model again. It wouldn't surprise me if they furloughed 900. I also imagine between now and December another 200 pilots will leave. That would leave about 1800 pilots. I'm not sure how training/transitioning would work, also how do the new rest rules effect this? Does anyone foresee any extension of the Q and 900 flying (meaning they fly until the end of the year)?
04-03-2012 | 03:01 PM
#64
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I would take that 700-800 pilots worth of airplanes being lost then hit "+" and insert how many pilots worth of 200's you think we are about to lose. Yeah 1200 sounds about right ://
04-03-2012 | 04:17 PM
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 501
814 assumes all CRJ-200 stay. In BK, anything goes with Delta and how many 50 seaters they want to park with gas constantly above $105/barrel.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
