Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XJT Whipsaw

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2013 | 06:56 PM
  #121  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

I gotta say, at times reading this thread my head is spinning. I honestly have no clue who works for who anymore. It seems like both sides are bickering about the same things in opposing manners. From someone that understands compromise (for a good cause) and is not afraid of change thus not caring if my job exists when this all blows over, I think we are totally screwed.

Not just from the vibes you get from the forum regulars but from what I hear around the line, we are going in the wrong direction. We took management's bait and they are stoked Im sure.
Reply
Old 01-19-2013 | 07:10 PM
  #122  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by gtechpilot
It's even easier than that - expand the XJT test run to all line holders in a base and prove that it works. It's already in use, so it should be quick and easy to implement If the XJT MEC can prove that it works for an entire base of line bidders, I'll lead the educational campaign on the ASA side. I'd personally give up vacation low outright to do away with the multiple bid sheets and to know my schedule a full week earlier. But prove the program works first in a full scale real world environment!

BTW, the ASA MEC was willing to do parallel test runs but the company is unwilling to fund it, and Smart pref won't do it for free because the modifications to fit our work rules would have been too extensive. If this is something the XJT MEC actually wants, the burden falls on them to make it work then sell it.
This sounds great, lets try and make this happen. Im honestly not afraid of it not working...because I want to find the best system! If it ends up being flightline then so be it...I just want to make sure we fully test and run both systems equally.
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 05:52 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
Thanks for posting the rates johnso and Jetblast.



Are you saying the arbitrator will come up with an "under-ride" so that ERJ pilots would get paid a lower rate when flying a larger aircraft?
The arbitrator can do what ever he wants. Your statement is not likely but you never know. It is highly likely that the rate will be lower than most because of the 9E numbers. That will hurt when there were other options at the time than going into negotiations for a rate.

If it does go to arbitration the MEC nor the pilot group will have any control of the outcome.
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 06:06 AM
  #124  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo
The arbitrator can do what ever he wants. Your statement is not likely but you never know. It is highly likely that the rate will be lower than most because of the 9E numbers. That will hurt when there were other options at the time than going into negotiations for a rate.

If it does go to arbitration the MEC nor the pilot group will have any control of the outcome.
.....and why are we in the position that it might have to go to arbitration? Oh yea, because you guys refused to negotiate in good faith with us so now we have to do it ourselves. I really hope flightline is worth it for you guys!
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 08:47 AM
  #125  
Delayed again's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Then I say GREAT! Lets do a test run with work rules in place for all schedules. If we cant get it to work case closed. Now we just have to get your MEC to agree to that! They have been unwilling to date.
This is exactly where the argument for SmartPref fails every time. There haven't been any work rules negotiated for SmartPref yet. To assume you are going to negotiate all the rules you want for that system is very naive.
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 09:39 AM
  #126  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Delayed again
This is exactly where the argument for SmartPref fails every time. There haven't been any work rules negotiated for SmartPref yet. To assume you are going to negotiate all the rules you want for that system is very naive.
If you are brining on a new system, you test it countless times, figure out what work rules you need to make it work, negotiate those rules, THEN draft a TA. To think we would try to bring on a new system before negotiating anything is moronic. We cant negotiate any work rules or even figure out what we need for that matter if the other side is unwilling to talk. Why would you think we would implement it prior to negotiating work rules for it? Thats just plain dumb!
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 10:18 AM
  #127  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
If you are brining on a new system, you test it countless times, figure out what work rules you need to make it work, negotiate those rules, THEN draft a TA. To think we would try to bring on a new system before negotiating anything is moronic. We cant negotiate any work rules or even figure out what we need for that matter if the other side is unwilling to talk. Why would you think we would implement it prior to negotiating work rules for it? Thats just plain dumb!
Why drag this out further? The ASA group has one that works and has support of the group. Once there is one MEC, your guys will just roll call vote everything. Why not go back and work on SmartPref then?
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 10:37 AM
  #128  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
Why drag this out further? The ASA group has one that works and has support of the group. Once there is one MEC, your guys will just roll call vote everything. Why not go back and work on SmartPref then?
Trust me i wish it was that easy. We have determined (through a lot of gruling research) that flightline in its current form will not protect the current QOL of our pilot group as a whole. The goal of this joint contract is to ensure QOL and compensation at the very least stays the same but hopefully improves for both pilot groups. Just as you feel our line bidding would be a concession for you, we have proven flightline would be for us. The reason we are pushing Smartpref is because it is our belief that if your group gives us a chance, we can negotiate the most interactive, user friendly PBS system in the industry. It will truly be one of a kind, and one that other pilot groups will certainly take a good hard look at for their next contracts. We would NEVER ask you guys to agree to anything without first negotiating work rules for it and seeing them in action. Ill admit, if you look at smartpref without work rules it is awful. But if you look at what it will be with our current rules plus a few more, it is really something special.
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 11:57 AM
  #129  
Vertisch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Catching breathe
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Trust me i wish it was that easy. We have determined (through a lot of gruling research) that flightline in its current form will not protect the current QOL of our pilot group as a whole. The goal of this joint contract is to ensure QOL and compensation at the very least stays the same but hopefully improves for both pilot groups. Just as you feel our line bidding would be a concession for you, we have proven flightline would be for us. The reason we are pushing Smartpref is because it is our belief that if your group gives us a chance, we can negotiate the most interactive, user friendly PBS system in the industry. It will truly be one of a kind, and one that other pilot groups will certainly take a good hard look at for their next contracts. We would NEVER ask you guys to agree to anything without first negotiating work rules for it and seeing them in action. Ill admit, if you look at smartpref without work rules it is awful. But if you look at what it will be with our current rules plus a few more, it is really something special.
Unfortunately what everyone is not discussing is that the company has offered a contract and it is an across the board cut in QOL, so they are NOT trying to maintain current status, all they want are cuts. And that was before the Pinnacle fiasco. it is only going to get worse for us.THIS is what is holding up the contract, NOT this mess with bidding.
We ALL want a good bidding system, but from our EXPERIENCE, anything with globablization is NOT good for the pilot group, only the company. No amount of work rules can change that. With what the company has already offered there is no way you can expect to negotiate the work rules you think you would need to make SmartPref acceptable. All you have to do to see how it turns out is look at Continental's pbs with globalization and it will end worse than that. We need to stop acting like children with this bidding snafu and see that the house is burning around us.
Reply
Old 01-20-2013 | 12:03 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Originally Posted by Flyjustin
As an XJT pilot. I think we all should vote to run this company into bankruptcy with a kickass contract for 3 years then go to mainline together run this b.i.ch into the ground like all regionals should do..,
With that attitude you won't be earning any Starbucks. They probably won't even let you into the crew room on Acey Day.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Major
2
06-14-2010 10:00 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
110
09-06-2008 08:11 PM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 09:05 PM
duvie
Regional
50
05-29-2008 09:42 AM
HermannGraf
Regional
49
05-24-2008 11:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices