Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SAPA 'Negotiations' Update >

SAPA 'Negotiations' Update

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SAPA 'Negotiations' Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2013 | 04:52 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Funny how almost every pilot at SkyWest who is pro ALPA has never been in ALPA, but those that have been would never go back.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 06:37 PM
  #42  
saturn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 47
From: Supreme Allied Commander
Default

Well union rant aside, SkyWest should at worst hold the line. Delta got what a 12% increase?, our CEO and management pay has made year over year continual increases, why should our trend reverse? We need greater than a 1%-2% increase to keep up with inflation. They know their saving grace at reducing costs is pulling CRJ200's offline and replacing them with more efficient super RJs. That was worth investing +$12,000,000,000.00. They can come at us all day long saying that new contracts depend on our concessions, but truth be told they will ink a new deal with or without them.

Originally Posted by meyers9163
Maybe you should work together instead of this continued BS where you skywest folks think your crap is better and could give a rats monkey about the ASA or Xjet guys. After all you all are owned by the same company. Seems counter productive not to.
?"Maybe YOU (not we?) should work together"?. When did anyone express contentious or mean spirited anything towards ASA/Xjet? Did I miss something? Maybe it was somewhere in that thread/youtube clip when some random pilot video recorded a SkyWest pilot helping bring down valet bags and mocked him for it. Or maybe it was one of those times on these threads where after positive news happens at SkyWest we are wisely tempered with: "your one CEO away from blah blah", "you guys think your crap is better", "kool-aid drinkers!", "every regional sucks, you're time will come", "I swear somewhere, sometime, some SkyWest guy said he was mainline". Gee I never knew that being proud/satisfied/content with where one works equates to being delusional/arrogant/snobby.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 07:52 PM
  #43  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
Well I tried the alpa union thing and I would rather keep my 2% pay. Airline unions are powerless being regulated by the RLA. The government will never release an airline to strike.
There have been numerous airline strikes in the last decade, spirit being the last one. But unions are not just about contracts. To me that is not the best reason for a union. You just have to be able and willing to see the Forrest from the trees.

Originally Posted by AFOX1BRAVO
Funny how almost every pilot at SkyWest who is pro ALPA has never been in ALPA, but those that have been would never go back.
Again, would any of those places have been better off if Ornstien, Hulas, or Tinnery had a run of the place with no union? If you don't think that each one of those pilot groups would be worse off without a union and those management, then you are not being intellectually honest.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 09:10 PM
  #44  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Again, would any of those places have been better off if Ornstien, Hulas, or Tinnery had a run of the place with no union? If you don't think that each one of those pilot groups would be worse off without a union and those management, then you are not being intellectually honest.
Now it's been a while since I've been in a logic class, but I believe the fallacy you're making is called "affirming the consequent". You're saying that just because Mesa, Trans States (vis a vis GoJet), and Pinnacle (I don't know who Tinnery is, but I think you mean Phil Trenary) are better off with unions (which I'll grant you for the sake of argument) then SkyWest would be better off with a union, too. That's not necessarily true.

I've said in previous posts, which you probably haven't seen, that I did in fact vote for ALPA the last time I was given the chance. Certainly that's not because I'm an advocate of ALPA, and I was conflicted about that vote. Generally speaking, I don't even like labor unions, but in our seniority-based industry which completely strips us of any free agency (and thus the ability to bargain individually, on our own merits) there are some definite advantages to having a true, legally binding contract, especially if you ever run afoul of the company.

Ideally, as others have said, we'd have an in house union. I don't need 2% of my income going toward some guy with a big mustache named Prater. I don't need to pay for office space in Herndon. I don't need a Tim Martins ALPA magazine. Or a lanyard. Or a pin. I certainly don't need to be funding lavish MEC banquets. Or their top shelf bar tabs. I think the corruption goes on; that's just off the top of my head. Still, I voted for it, begrudgingly, because there are some benefits.

My original point, though, is that you assume that because bad airlines are better off with a union, ours would be, too. But maybe not. You can't prove it either way.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 09:28 PM
  #45  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 F/O
Default

SAPA + Negotiation = oxymoron.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 09:34 PM
  #46  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

Originally Posted by Lloyd Christmas
SAPA + Negotiation = oxymoron.
I see what you're getting at, but...

To negotiate, you don't need to have a union. You just need to have leverage. It just so happens, ironically, that our leverage is the threat of unionization.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 10:13 PM
  #47  
Seatownflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pilot sleeping.
Default

Originally Posted by AFOX1BRAVO
Funny how almost every pilot at SkyWest who is pro ALPA has never been in ALPA, but those that have been would never go back.
I just haven't found a better made lanyard.
Reply
Old 06-29-2013 | 05:02 AM
  #48  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

SAPA negotiating update:

Well dudes, we met with management this week, and like, they told us we make too much money! I know, right? Well we told them better step off dudes! Then they're all like "we need to compete with all the other regionals" and we're like, but dudes, like, you just ordered 400 sweet new airplanes! And they're all like, "we need you to be cost competitive in order to fly them". Bogus! So we went "ok, dudes, lets just wait and see what ExpressJet gets then add on 2%", and they were like "ok, we have that situation well in hand, sounds good to us". So like, that's our update! Hope you liked it dudes! Hang loose and we'll see you braus out on the line! Ok!
Reply
Old 06-29-2013 | 05:31 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: erj-145 FO
Default

republic has a union, 7 plus years without a new contract plus worse work rules than any other regional.
Reply
Old 06-29-2013 | 07:50 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Surprise
Now it's been a while since I've been in a logic class, but I believe the fallacy you're making is called "affirming the consequent". You're saying that just because Mesa, Trans States (vis a vis GoJet), and Pinnacle (I don't know who Tinnery is, but I think you mean Phil Trenary) are better off with unions (which I'll grant you for the sake of argument) then SkyWest would be better off with a union, too. That's not necessarily true.

I've said in previous posts, which you probably haven't seen, that I did in fact vote for ALPA the last time I was given the chance. Certainly that's not because I'm an advocate of ALPA, and I was conflicted about that vote. Generally speaking, I don't even like labor unions, but in our seniority-based industry which completely strips us of any free agency (and thus the ability to bargain individually, on our own merits) there are some definite advantages to having a true, legally binding contract, especially if you ever run afoul of the company.

Ideally, as others have said, we'd have an in house union. I don't need 2% of my income going toward some guy with a big mustache named Prater. I don't need to pay for office space in Herndon. I don't need a Tim Martins ALPA magazine. Or a lanyard. Or a pin. I certainly don't need to be funding lavish MEC banquets. Or their top shelf bar tabs. I think the corruption goes on; that's just off the top of my head. Still, I voted for it, begrudgingly, because there are some benefits.

My original point, though, is that you assume that because bad airlines are better off with a union, ours would be, too. But maybe not. You can't prove it either way.
I like how he tried to hide his igorance with the word "intellectually"! Heres one for you Nevets, if you can't undersand how your premise is flawed then you are "intellectually retarded".
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
duvie
Regional
399
02-25-2011 03:31 PM
Jack Bauer
Regional
100
10-27-2007 10:33 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices