Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SAPA 'Negotiations' Update >

SAPA 'Negotiations' Update

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SAPA 'Negotiations' Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2013 | 01:52 PM
  #61  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by What
Nope, I have friends whom fly at SKW and they know they are drinking the cool aid a bit much. When the 30 Ejets were announced some were smart enough to understand the company was telling them we will shrink and will have to give concessions while at it. Same thing at Pinnacle and Eagle. I don't want to see SKW pilots fail because I don't wish anyone harm and because it will affect me as well.
We're actually acquiring 40 R-Jets, not 30, and in return we're removing 40 CR2's from the UA system but only as they come off agreement sometime over the next 2.5 years (30 months). The initial 40 E-Jets will feel like growth then attrition will offset the slow loss of the 40 CR2's.

SkyWest will shrink but it will be a slow shrink unlike the losses others have sadly experienced. Also Mgmt. will not cut our pay without an agreement voted in by the pilots and our pilot group will do what’s best for SkyWest's future. If taking a bit of a cut is needed it will happen but we will work together to minimalize loss. I guarantee you our cuts won’t be anywhere near as deep as 9Es were. Regardless keep in mind if and when we take any reductions they will be caused by cuts forced upon airlines like Pinnacle and Mesa; and also because of young airlines with lower overall cost like GoJets and Compass; all unionized carriers. I remember a time when the disgruntled 10%ers on here attacked us SkyWest pilots for not setting the bar. Now you’re dying for us to take bigger cuts than you in order to validate and prove what many of you have been preaching, that our Mgmt. group will screw us more during hard times because we’re non-union. Well that's truly sad, but get ready for more disappointment because it won’t happen.

What you guys fail to remember is that we’re competitors. My airline competes against yours and I want my airline to succeed, that’s business and the majority of us at SkyWest realize this. Life is not fair; there will never be equality and anyone who thinks there should be or could be needs to wake up before it's too late.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 02:00 PM
  #62  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
Originally Posted by What
Nope, I have friends whom fly at SKW and they know they are drinking the cool aid a bit much. When the 30 Ejets were announced some were smart enough to understand the company was telling them we will shrink and will have to give concessions while at it. Same thing at Pinnacle and Eagle. I don't want to see SKW pilots fail because I don't wish anyone harm and because it will affect me as well.
We're actually acquiring 40 R-Jets, not 30, and in return we’re parking 40 CR2's but only as they come off agreement sometime over the next 30 months (2.5 years). The initial 40 E-Jets will feel like growth then attrition will offset the slow loss of the 40 CR2s.

SkyWest will shrink but it will be a slow shrink unlike the losses others have sadly experienced. Also Mgmt. will not cut our pay without an agreement voted in by the pilots and our pilot group will do what’s best for SkyWest's future. If taking a bit of a cut is needed it will happen but we will work together to minimalize loss. I guarantee you our cuts won’t be anywhere near as deep as 9Es were. Regardless keep in mind our cuts come because of airlines like Pinnacle, Mesa and GoJets; all unionized carriers. I remember a time when the disgruntled 10%ers on here attacked us SkyWest pilots for not setting the bar. Now you’re dying for us to take bigger cuts than you in order to validate and prove what many of you have been preaching, that our Mgmt. group will screw us more during hard times because we’re non-union. Well that's truly sad, but get ready for more disappointment because it won’t happen.

What you guys fail to remember is that we’re competitors. My airline competes against yours and I want my airline to succeed, that’s business and the majority of us at SkyWest realize this. Life is not fair; there will never be equality and anyone who thinks there should be or could be needs to wake the hell up before it's too late.
Well, if you do get to vote then you actually have a chance to raise the bar! Or just keep what you have. Or lower the bar. So time will tell. We'll see if you guys can actually make a difference for the better rather than just being a passenger on this pattern bargaining roller coaster driven by all of us union pilot. I would love to see you guys use whatever leverage management gives you I order to change the trajectory for the better. This is your chance!
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 02:13 PM
  #63  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Well, if you do get to vote then you actually have a chance to raise the bar! Or just keep what you have. Or lower the bar. So time will tell. We'll see if you guys can actually make a difference for the better rather than just being a passenger on this pattern bargaining roller coaster driven by all of us union pilot. I would love to see you guys use whatever leverage management gives you I order to change the trajectory for the better. This is your chance!
Damn and I thought I was quick, lol, you quoted me before I could correct a few things.

My friend the bar has already been lowered. IMO, at best we can only maintain. We at Inc. (SkyWest and XJT) are well above the bar like a giraffe sticking up out the top of a train as it's speeding toward a tunnel. This industry is driven by mainline and as long as they’re writing the checks they will always search of the" most efficient" contractual feed. Don’t you when it comes to putting a roof on your house or choosing a TV provider? What happens when your TV provider’s rates creep up beyond their competitors?

I know this will infuriate many but I don't want to be the highest paid; I want to be competitively paid so my Mgmt. team can compete, win new flying and retain current contracts. That’s far more important to me than making a few bucks more per hour.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 03:10 PM
  #64  
saturn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 47
From: Supreme Allied Commander
Default

Frankly these are negotiations. Management can point at competing pilot pay/work rules all day long, but that doesn't mean that the rates we offer mainline are dependent upon our pay. Thats all management wants us to think though. Running a more efficient operation with efficient airplanes has more of a factor on cost than pilot group wages. Why else do you think they were pushing SCF, fly the block, econ speeds, staff to make reserves work 74.9 hrs etc so hard? I think we could realistically get raises and still be competitive. We don't have to win all RFPs or even grow. I see nothing changing being a minimum acceptable thing, and I'm sure management has already planned for that being the end result. Managements move on all this is oh whats the qoute? Under commit, over preform? "Hey we all need pay cuts to survive...*negotiations*..hey we are happy to announce no pay cuts!! ~pilots sigh of relief and are satisfied, management sighs of relief that they avoid giving raises while being profitable.

Put it this way, under what circumstances do you ever see it being clear to management that pay raises would be a good move? Even when we are profitable and picking up new RFPs, they can counter with well the future looks really cut throat and competetive, so I dont think we can. They can sing that song and kick the can down the road all day long.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 04:15 PM
  #65  
JustAMushroom's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
No, SkyWest has never changed anything in this document without either a SAPA or entire pilot group vote.
This is incorrect. I don't want to fan the flame of the haters on this board so I'll leave the details out. SkyWest, at its worst, is better than any of the current batch of regionals and we don't have to romanticize their record to prove it.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 05:08 PM
  #66  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

The highest cost to an airline is fuel followed by labor. Since SkyWest doesn't pay for fuel labor is their highest cost. Regardless of how you cut it all cost associated with an airline effect the bottom line and paying every pilot $2 more per hour equates to $5.7M+ in increased cost.

3180 pilots x 75 hr (MMG) = 238,500 x 12 months = 2,862,000 hours x $2 = $5,724,000

That’s only pilots; all labor groups want more money. I'm not saying we're now worth more, we are, but we must stay competitive. $2 more per hour isn’t worth stagnation and lost contracts.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 06:18 PM
  #67  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default SAPA 'Negotiations' Update

Geez guys, you are all already defeated. Management throws a few softballs out and you strike out without even swinging. Way to go! Oh well, figures.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 06:42 PM
  #68  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Geez guys, you are all already defeated. Management throws a few softballs out and you strike out without even swinging. Way to go! Oh well, figures.
9E stole the ball.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 06:44 PM
  #69  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

My views aren't derived from Mgmts so called softballs.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 06:53 PM
  #70  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
The highest cost to an airline is fuel followed by labor. Since SkyWest doesn't pay for fuel labor is their highest cost. Regardless of how you cut it all cost associated with an airline effect the bottom line and paying every pilot $2 more per hour equates to $5.7M+ in increased cost.

3180 pilots x 75 hr (MMG) = 238,500 x 12 months = 2,862,000 hours x $2 = $5,724,000

That’s only pilots; all labor groups want more money. I'm not saying we're now worth more, we are, but we must stay competitive. $2 more per hour isn’t worth stagnation and lost contracts.
matchpoint, the union email that has been going around for a week or mentions that SKW will be parking 100 airplanes while EXJ parks 150, all whom are being flown for United, what the latest on that? Also, how about the Delta 50 seaters from last year. It was something like 66. Have they all been parked?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
duvie
Regional
399
02-25-2011 03:31 PM
Jack Bauer
Regional
100
10-27-2007 10:33 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices