Components of company's proposal to ENY MEC
#171
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 CA
I would think that is obvious. The whole regional model relies on the shell game where one airline offers quick upgrades in exchange for pilot contract concession. Then others follow suit. IF 10,000 pilots are taking a stand against this, it becomes impossible to shift a large amount of flying around to the lowest bidder. If a pilot group of 4,000 says no, it makes it easier for the group of 2,000 to say no, since they know they won't be undercut and they feel a sense of dishonor if they try to undercut the others through concessions.
Finally, the puppy mills aren't cranking out the pilots like they used to so there is no way to use the SJS to attract enough newbies. It should also be painfully obvious by now, that never ending rounds of concessions just ensure regionals will persists, and fly ever larger aircraft at the expense of mainline jobs.
Finally, the puppy mills aren't cranking out the pilots like they used to so there is no way to use the SJS to attract enough newbies. It should also be painfully obvious by now, that never ending rounds of concessions just ensure regionals will persists, and fly ever larger aircraft at the expense of mainline jobs.
#172
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Guys, a few things.
To say that MIA would still be open, or if the eagle pilots vote yes then "X" would happen, etc - that is saying that management is purposefully allowing an employee group to dictate long-term business plans involving whole companies and billions in assets.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that management would put any labor group, especially the pilots (the only real commodity group) in the driver's seat?
Parker has said it himself, they are merely trying to lock in lowest cost as long as possible. That is parallel to, but not dependent upon their business plan. In other words, the business plan remains unchanged regardless of what they are able to do with labor. At best, the pilots may temporarily affect timing.
Also do not expect anything in the form of assurances of base decisions. Management would never, ever put that in writing. If it's not in writing, it doesn't exist. Anyone remember how long "...the foreseeable future..." was? It's a waste of time to even talk about keeping a base open as part of a deal. One only has to think back to the situations under which LA and BOS closed.
To say that MIA would still be open, or if the eagle pilots vote yes then "X" would happen, etc - that is saying that management is purposefully allowing an employee group to dictate long-term business plans involving whole companies and billions in assets.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that management would put any labor group, especially the pilots (the only real commodity group) in the driver's seat?
Parker has said it himself, they are merely trying to lock in lowest cost as long as possible. That is parallel to, but not dependent upon their business plan. In other words, the business plan remains unchanged regardless of what they are able to do with labor. At best, the pilots may temporarily affect timing.
Also do not expect anything in the form of assurances of base decisions. Management would never, ever put that in writing. If it's not in writing, it doesn't exist. Anyone remember how long "...the foreseeable future..." was? It's a waste of time to even talk about keeping a base open as part of a deal. One only has to think back to the situations under which LA and BOS closed.
#173
The problem is that we have been holding the line, while others are happy upgrading and enjoying envoy shrinking.
Unfortunately it was game over when PDT voted yes. Either we cave or cease to exist.
I'm waiting for the outcome of thiese negotiations to take a decision of how I will vote.
Unfortunately it was game over when PDT voted yes. Either we cave or cease to exist.

I'm waiting for the outcome of thiese negotiations to take a decision of how I will vote.
#174
True. Delta pilots didn't become some of the highest paid pilots in the business by giving concessions and shrinking to profitability. They held their line in full knowledge that airlines require pilots to fly the aircraft.
#175
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Apples to frikken watermelons. Contract anything doesn't have the San leverage, especially if there are multiple vendors. The bean counters are always going to go with the cheapest when all else is equal
#176
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Bent over
Either become like PSA and PDT or stop getting a paycheck.
#177
Yeah I don't think Envoy pilots (or any regional pilots for that matter) have the same leverage as mainline pilots. I think it's time for Envoy pilots to wake up and realize that they're not mainline pilots.
Either become like PSA and PDT or stop getting a paycheck.
Either become like PSA and PDT or stop getting a paycheck.
Which are you?
#178
Bean counters go for whatever saves or makes them money. It's apples to apples. The circumstances are different for each airline but it is still a matter of union pilots negotiating fair contracts to fly aircraft.
#179
Banned
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Guys, a few things.
To say that MIA would still be open, or if the eagle pilots vote yes then "X" would happen, etc - that is saying that management is purposefully allowing an employee group to dictate long-term business plans involving whole companies and billions in assets.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that management would put any labor group, especially the pilots (the only real commodity group) in the driver's seat?
Parker has said it himself, they are merely trying to lock in lowest cost as long as possible. That is parallel to, but not dependent upon their business plan. In other words, the business plan remains unchanged regardless of what they are able to do with labor. At best, the pilots may temporarily affect timing.
Also do not expect anything in the form of assurances of base decisions. Management would never, ever put that in writing. If it's not in writing, it doesn't exist. Anyone remember how long "...the foreseeable future..." was? It's a waste of time to even talk about keeping a base open as part of a deal. One only has to think back to the situations under which LA and BOS closed.
To say that MIA would still be open, or if the eagle pilots vote yes then "X" would happen, etc - that is saying that management is purposefully allowing an employee group to dictate long-term business plans involving whole companies and billions in assets.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that management would put any labor group, especially the pilots (the only real commodity group) in the driver's seat?
Parker has said it himself, they are merely trying to lock in lowest cost as long as possible. That is parallel to, but not dependent upon their business plan. In other words, the business plan remains unchanged regardless of what they are able to do with labor. At best, the pilots may temporarily affect timing.
Also do not expect anything in the form of assurances of base decisions. Management would never, ever put that in writing. If it's not in writing, it doesn't exist. Anyone remember how long "...the foreseeable future..." was? It's a waste of time to even talk about keeping a base open as part of a deal. One only has to think back to the situations under which LA and BOS closed.
I guess if you repeat that to yourself enough times it allows you to sleep at night. Of course it doesn't help the thousands of Envoy employees in MIA whose lives have just been ruined. I'm speaking in particular about employees who are NOT flight crew members and for whom commuting is NOT an option. What do you suggest they do now, all knowing one? Being based in MIA I see first hand fathers and mothers who are now facing a very empty future thanks to people like you misleading the pilots and being very selective with your 'facts" earlier this year.
And stop being naive and acting so innocent. You know as well as anybody else that the E175s were to be deployed to MIA initially. It was made very clear and was a not so secret bit of information. Again, you are just being selective with your information. Just like you guys were very selective with the staffing information at other Regionals...perpetuating the myth that nobody could staff their current flying let alone new flying. The gullibale pilots at this company need to share the blame...they didn't need to fall for your misinformation and could have done research on their own. But don't try to reverse rationalize things now. You and the rest of the MEC from back in those days share responsibility for what is now happening at this company.
#180
Banned
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
I would think that is obvious. The whole regional model relies on the shell game where one airline offers quick upgrades in exchange for pilot contract concession. Then others follow suit. IF 10,000 pilots are taking a stand against this, it becomes impossible to shift a large amount of flying around to the lowest bidder. If a pilot group of 4,000 says no, it makes it easier for the group of 2,000 to say no, since they know they won't be undercut and they feel a sense of dishonor if they try to undercut the others through concessions.
Finally, the puppy mills aren't cranking out the pilots like they used to so there is no way to use the SJS to attract enough newbies. It should also be painfully obvious by now, that never ending rounds of concessions just ensure regionals will persists, and fly ever larger aircraft at the expense of mainline jobs.
Finally, the puppy mills aren't cranking out the pilots like they used to so there is no way to use the SJS to attract enough newbies. It should also be painfully obvious by now, that never ending rounds of concessions just ensure regionals will persists, and fly ever larger aircraft at the expense of mainline jobs.
Since the union path takes forever, the only way for anything to change is for pilots to do it themselves. Say I not going to follow those jets to the other company. But then reality sets in, and when the furlough comes we realize that outside of aviation, we are unskilled labor (unless you have a degree in something else you can use). So the choice for many is follow those jets and make 25k year one, or go work retail for the 18k.
Management knows all this and that's why they continue to whipsaw us.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



