Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Components of company's proposal to ENY MEC >

Components of company's proposal to ENY MEC

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Components of company's proposal to ENY MEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2014 | 10:59 AM
  #181  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Bent over
Default

Originally Posted by Romulus
Spoken like either a mainline pilot who wants the regionals to fail or someone who would screw over fellow regional pilots just to build time for a major.

Which are you?
If the regionals fail that means more mainline jobs. Who wouldn't want that? It's a win win for mainline pilots and regional pilots.
I don't need to build time (I think 12000 TT is plenty) and I'm not a mainline pilot. I just think Envoy pilots (and express jet and repubic) are fooling themselves if they think regional pilots will ever have leverage when companies like PSA, PDT and Mesa lower the bar, and fellow regional pilots flock there in hopes of quick upgrades. Until pilots refuse to work for such companies the regional industry is doomed.
So Envoy can either join the race to the bottom or fail to exist is what management wants you to believe. So far it looks like management is the one to believe thus far. ALPA has done nothing to prove otherwise.
Until ALPA shows Envoy something credible that holding the line is working, I've got my money on management winning this game.
Reply
Old 11-11-2014 | 11:27 AM
  #182  
skypilot35's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 1
From: It's hot out here.
Default

Originally Posted by deadreckoning
If the regionals fail that means more mainline jobs. Who wouldn't want that? It's a win win for mainline pilots and regional pilots.
I don't need to build time (I think 12000 TT is plenty) and I'm not a mainline pilot. I just think Envoy pilots (and express jet and repubic) are fooling themselves if they think regional pilots will ever have leverage when companies like PSA, PDT and Mesa lower the bar, and fellow regional pilots flock there in hopes of quick upgrades. Until pilots refuse to work for such companies the regional industry is doomed.
So Envoy can either join the race to the bottom or fail to exist is what management wants you to believe. So far it looks like management is the one to believe thus far. ALPA has done nothing to prove otherwise.
Until ALPA shows Envoy something credible that holding the line is working, I've got my money on management winning this game.
I agree with your logic, but where is the data to support your hypothesis. There is of course the idea of supply and demand. Dry up the supply (regionals) increase the demand (cost per ticket). Win-win for the management. Just a thought.

I do however hope you are correct.
Reply
Old 11-11-2014 | 11:41 AM
  #183  
embraer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deadreckoning
If the regionals fail that means more mainline jobs. Who wouldn't want that? It's a win win for mainline pilots and regional pilots.
I agree with most of what you have been saying. Especially in regards to Regional pilots not being Mainline pilots. Most current Regional pilots forget the fact that the Regionals operate under different rules and realities than mainline operators. We therefore can't expect to use the same tactics and get the same results.

The only thing I disagree with is the paragraph I quoted above. If a Regional fails it may or may not mean more mainline jobs. But what it absolutely will create is a saturation of unemployed, qualified pilots all chasing the same jobs.

So even if it did create more jobs at mainline in theory, the number of vacancies would be canceled out by the excess number of available pilots. Keep in mind there is always the flow of military pilots, LCC pilots, and pilots from large Cargo operators like Atlas and Omni. Not to mention the American pilots overseas with Boeing and Airbus experience.

That group is always hired first. Regional Captains get the left overs, while Regional FOs are hung out to dry. Even with more mainline jobs there are more than enough pilots from that "favored" group to fill seats. The excess of Regional Captains unemployed and looking for a job will round out the remaining slots.

Just saying...a Regional fails today and the market is flooded with pilots. That is guaranteed. More jobs at mainline? Not a guarantee, and either way not a problem from a staffing point of view.
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 02:42 AM
  #184  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Bent over
Default

I said regionals (as in a whole) not a regional (singular).
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 05:03 AM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Romulus
Bean counters go for whatever saves or makes them money. It's apples to apples. The circumstances are different for each airline but it is still a matter of union pilots negotiating fair contracts to fly aircraft.
Nope, not even close. Mainline has restrictive scope. Without it regionals would be flying anything that makes them more money. Cost of the asa and performance is the main criteria for regionals, therefore no leverage.
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 06:26 AM
  #186  
Romulus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by deadreckoning
If the regionals fail that means more mainline jobs. Who wouldn't want that? It's a win win for mainline pilots and regional pilots.
While I agree with that premise, the fact remains you're thinking like a pilot and not an airline manager. It is not in any airline's best interests for their regionals to fail.

Whipsawing keeps costs down. They whipsaw the regionals against the mainline to keep mainline costs down and they whipsaw regionals against each other to keep feed costs down. It's a win for the airline. They don't GAS what pilots think about it.
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 06:30 AM
  #187  
Romulus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
Nope, not even close. Mainline has restrictive scope. Without it regionals would be flying anything that makes them more money. Cost of the asa and performance is the main criteria for regionals, therefore no leverage.
Do you mean ASM?

Regionals serve several functions. Besides the whipsaw factor as noted in my previous post, they also can serve markets not financially feasible for mainline routes. Clearly it's more economical to fly a full A320 than a full E145, but that economy of scale quickly disappears when the A320 only carries 30-50 passengers yet costs the same to operate.

Regionals allow airlines to reach markets otherwise uneconomical to service.
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:05 AM
  #188  
Alex14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: OO
Default

When are you guys expecting to hear something about an official new proposal?
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:50 AM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Romulus
Do you mean ASM?

Regionals serve several functions. Besides the whipsaw factor as noted in my previous post, they also can serve markets not financially feasible for mainline routes. Clearly it's more economical to fly a full A320 than a full E145, but that economy of scale quickly disappears when the A320 only carries 30-50 passengers yet costs the same to operate.

Regionals allow airlines to reach markets otherwise uneconomical to service.
No, I mean airline service agreement. But the rest is correct
Reply
Old 11-12-2014 | 07:50 AM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Never hopefully.
AA flight attendants voted no, by a slim sixteen votes.
AA pilots from the boards appear to be against AAG proposal to them.
Eagle/envoy 4 times has told AAG take a hike.
Only people passing there ta's are the groups from us airways.

Parker has started a firestorm and is trying to buy his way out of trouble before he takes AAG into bankruptcy which he will do anyway.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Redundant Guy
Regional
201
01-28-2013 07:06 AM
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Regularguy
United
80
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
115
11-22-2010 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices