Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2015 | 06:31 AM
  #331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thump
Separating the seniority list is on hold until the lawsuit from the "Midwest 6" over seniority gets settled.
Makes sense I guess, especially since they are on the IMSL.
Reply
Old 05-26-2015 | 07:32 AM
  #332  
thump's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: ERJ-170 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
What's the "Midwest 6"?
Unclear if it's literally 6 guys, but there are a handfull of furloughed Midwest guys that came to F9 (pre-IMSL implementation) that are suing for their seniority.

I know that all the RAH guys that went to F9 during that period were forced to interview for the position and resign their seniority number. With that said, I don't know what the Midwest guys did to get hired at that time.
Reply
Old 05-26-2015 | 08:36 AM
  #333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot
You're a bozo, indeed. The F9 guys didn't choose RAH anymore than you chose to have a small ****.
Actually you did. During the negotiations with Southwest the F9 guys wanted final approval of the seniority list. The bankruptcy judge rightfully thought that was foolish. Subsequent negotiations failed to reach an agreement even though many guys at F9 already had apps at Southwest (including pilots in the negotiating room) . Southwest then moved on to AirTran and F9 got RAH. Moral of the story, the one time F9 guys actually chose to fight for themselves they shouldn't have.
Reply
Old 05-26-2015 | 09:12 AM
  #334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
Default

Originally Posted by FEtoFO
I'm pretty sure the F9 Pilots are being pulled from the IMSL, but that's just what was in a IBT update. I don't know of one RAH pilot that is interested in Frontier. Maybe the guys who live in DEN, or FOs with no PIC. I can see how having the IMSL could cause issues with hiring, and unneeded legal actions.
Took the words right out of my mouth. The only guys at RAH I know that could possibly want to work for F9 must have never been a part of the DEN operation. If they had seen just how miserable the experience was perhaps F9 wouldn't have to worry about the "hire or not to hire" situation of Republic guys because nobody would likely even apply. I know it was also a two way street and a lot of RAH guys acted like wild ape's as well.

If it is of any value, the number of RAH guys getting hired at United are incredibly favorable and promising. I recall Delta was also hiring a ton of RAH guys before I left. Hopefully that trend continues so the good guys of RAH can find a home with a good airline.
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 08:54 AM
  #335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

RAHCONTRACTNOW should be back up soon. Should be some good info to counterbalance the company's propaganda


Btw 4 new-hires from January have been removed from the seniority list. Trouble during IOE?
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #336  
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
Actually you did. During the negotiations with Southwest the F9 guys wanted final approval of the seniority list. The bankruptcy judge rightfully thought that was foolish. Subsequent negotiations failed to reach an agreement even though many guys at F9 already had apps at Southwest (including pilots in the negotiating room) . Southwest then moved on to AirTran and F9 got RAH. Moral of the story, the one time F9 guys actually chose to fight for themselves they shouldn't have.
Not true, WN truly had no intention of buying F9. All WN wanted was to get a good look at their books before massively expanding into the DEN market. Pure brilliance on their part.
As for AirTran, WN was waiting to buy them. They had same fleet (737) and already had plans to axe the 717's. Frontier has no common type (all Airbus).
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 03:19 PM
  #337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Luv2Rotate
Not true, WN truly had no intention of buying F9. All WN wanted was to get a good look at their books before massively expanding into the DEN market. Pure brilliance on their part.
As for AirTran, WN was waiting to buy them. They had same fleet (737) and already had plans to axe the 717's. Frontier has no common type (all Airbus).
Really don't want to argue but the "peak at the books" argument makes no sense. The books were more or less public record (F9 was in bankruptcy). If a company based in Denver could not make the market work why would Southwest take their business cues off that company? The "peek at the books" argument is made by pilots that refuse to acknowledge an undeniable truth: they squandered an excellent opportunity because of greed.

Also, why expand into Denver if you can cheaply aquire a "hometown company" that owns the most lucrative gates in that market? I couldn't have been that expensive, a regional bought them.

Southwest's CEO has publicly stated they have no problem being a two airframe fleet. They just had no need for a smaller airframe like the 717 (especially when Delta wanted them so badly).

Furthermore, if it was the intention of Southwest they could have quickly aquired F9 and slowly phased in the 737 while leasing/selling the extremely popular airframe that F9 already owned (exactly what they did with AirTran). Seemless.

The F9 drivers hosed themselves.

Ironically, Republic sold F9 to Inidgo for less than what Southwest offered to purchase them outright.

History sucks when it makes you look like a fool.
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 03:39 PM
  #338  
spaaks's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
Really don't want to argue but the "peak at the books" argument makes no sense. The books were more or less public record (F9 was in bankruptcy). If a company based in Denver could not make the market work why would Southwest take their business cues off that company? The "peek at the books" argument is made by pilots that refuse to acknowledge an undeniable truth: they squandered an excellent opportunity because of greed.

Also, why expand into Denver if you can cheaply aquire a "hometown company" that owns the most lucrative gates in that market? I couldn't have been that expensive, a regional bought them.

Southwest's CEO has publicly stated they have no problem being a two airframe fleet. They just had no need for a smaller airframe like the 717 (especially when Delta wanted them so badly).

Furthermore, if it was the intention of Southwest they could have quickly aquired F9 and slowly phased in the 737 while leasing/selling the extremely popular airframe that F9 already owned (exactly what they did with AirTran). Seemless.

The F9 drivers hosed themselves.

Ironically, Republic sold F9 to Inidgo for less than what Southwest offered to purchase them outright.

History sucks when it makes you look like a fool.
Sound logic, but: yes the balance sheets...etc are public info, but southwest was looking to find out which specific routes/markets were their most profitable, load factors...etc and those are the ones southwest opened first
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 03:55 PM
  #339  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks
Sound logic, but: yes the balance sheets...etc are public info, but southwest was looking to find out which specific routes/markets were their most profitable, load factors...etc and those are the ones southwest opened first
Kind of funny that Johnny O at MESA got spanked for doing the exact same thing.

Aloha Airlines sues Mesa Air Group - Pacific Business News
Reply
Old 05-27-2015 | 04:58 PM
  #340  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by FEtoFO
RAHCONTRACTNOW should be back up soon. Should be some good info to counterbalance the company's propaganda


Btw 4 new-hires from January have been removed from the seniority list. Trouble during IOE?
Wow. So negotiations are that bad huh? At this point I would think the pilot group asking for the moon may not be unreasonable...because hey- it's that or what? Dissolution of RAH?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices