Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
$100,000 Minimum Regional First Officer >

$100,000 Minimum Regional First Officer

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

$100,000 Minimum Regional First Officer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2015 | 06:53 PM
  #161  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
You've mentioned that split before, numerous times, and I'm sorry but it just destroys your credibility when you do so. Which is a shame, because you mostly make good arguments for many things.

I know you've quoted the (United I think? Whatever) official filings that "prove under penalty of intergalactic perjury" that 94% of their profits came from their express operation. I don't believe it, and neither does anyone else. Anyone. Not even you.

You really think an airline operation that has 800ish mainline planes and 400ish RJ's averaging about a quarter the size and carrying a quarter to less of the pax and almost none of the cargo could possibly make 94% of the profits? If so, why are all the airlines parking them and transferring block hours to their mainline? So they can make 94% less profits? You really think there is enough pilot or total labor cost differential to fuel that much of a profit differential? If so, from where? RJ's, even the big ones, are an expensive seat and labor per pax cost is actually fairly high.

You really, actually think, that these global behemoths printing billions per quarter are really just small regional powerhouse ticket agents carrying the deadweight of a massive global alliance?

I don't care what spreadsheet or filing form you think you saw, there is no way regionals are makins 94% of billion(s) per quarter per airline in profits. No way. And you don't believe that either.

Fred Reid, is that you?
The person who wrote those financial reports sure believes it. Look I don't know why you are mad at me, I'm simply showing what the data presents. Do I believe it? Well, I know that the airline pricing model is so convoluted that it doesn't surprise if this was the case.

To explain why mainline is getting rid of regional jets is very simple, they aren't, they are dumping unprofitable routes. Where demand is strong, they are switching to mainline planes. On the surface it appears that mainline is recapturing flying. However, they are simply consolidating flying so they can better utilize the aircraft they have in the profitable routes.

The pilot shortage is not yet an issue, but will be in a year or two(this is a direct quote from management at my last recurrent).

It may be hard for some to believe, but legacy's don't make money in the routes they compete with LCC's in. You have to have pricing power in a market to make money, that is business 101. If you look at the legacy network as a whole, the places they have pricing power, is where the RJ's are.

It defies logic, and I know what you are saying, but here is maybe a video that describes what I'm talking about. Fast forward in this CNBC video http://www.hulu.com/watch/46550 to around 1:27 min, where he says the 767 transcon only makes $200. Just for reference, almost every RJ flight makes tens of thousands of dollars. Is it still so hard to believe?

I think the best way to sum this up, is Southwest has destroyed the Legacy model. It's now just a large operation that holds market share to feed the regionals.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 07:00 PM
  #162  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein
The reality is that flying an airliner is EASY. This job as a whole is EASY.
Yup, so easy that everybody does it.
Guess that is why commercial (or higher) licensed pilots are less than 1% of the population of the US.

Regional airlines are entry level jobs and employ entry level workers who should be making entry level wages. Regional pilots in this thread are like McDonalds burger flippers complaining that they are not paid and treated like an executive chef at a five star restaurant. GTF over yourselves.
Yup, the commuters are entry level jobs not un-unlike Mickey D's.
One major difference. Mickey D's employees are unskilled labor while pilots are skilled labor even at the beginning of their airline careers and should be compensated higher than un-skilled labor.

The commuters have had a glut of available pilots over the last decade (or more) so they could be picky and pay (abysmally) lower wages. Now those days are coming to an end and the now those companies that have been making money hand-over-fist by not paying their pilots are the ones screaming bloody murder.
2bad2sad.

Come on Fegelin, what self-loathing management puke are you?
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 07:17 PM
  #163  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Regional airlines are entry level jobs and employ entry level workers who should be making entry level wages. Regional pilots in this thread are like McDonalds burger flippers complaining that they are not paid and treated like an executive chef at a five star restaurant. GTF over yourselves.
Where do I get my get out of jail free card from the FAA since I'm just an entry level pilot. According to what you're saying, I'm just learning how to fly airplanes, and am considered to be 'in training,' and therefore do not share the same responsibilities as the big boys nor deserve compensation commensurate said responsibilities.

When in your infinite wisdom does this entry level end? Why does it end at a different time for some? For example, if I was a minority or a woman, it appears I would gain the necessary skills to move beyond this entry level position faster. Why is that? Are they born with innate knowledge of flying? What happens when your airline goes defunct, or the pilot group gets too top heavy. Now you've spent 7 or 8 years as "newbie, entry level pilot," and have to start over at another airline. Are you still considered entry level by your standards?

Last edited by WhiskeyTangoF; 08-17-2015 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 08:36 PM
  #164  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Exactly. As soon as mainline pilots treat us as EQUALS, then we can go somewhere. However they are still living in the past and treating us as inferior. You work for a Delta wholly owned carrier that flies Delta owned aircraft. Yet you have to "interview" to find out if you too can become the "best of the best". I rest my case....
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 08:39 PM
  #165  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyTangoF
I was literally thinking about this earlier today, its as if you stole the thoughts from my head. The 50 seater jets will be going away eventually, and replaced with these 76 seater "regional" jets. Now 4 legs would be equal to 304 passengers carried daily, assuming a full flight each leg of course. Compare that to the previous 200 passengers carried daily. One argument for the large pay disparity has always been the smaller size of the aircraft, and the lesser amount of passengers carried. How then is it rationalized that pilots should carry more passengers in larger aircraft for the same, or less pay (see recent concessionary contracts)?

With the internet, and social media, why aren't we doing more and standing up for ourselves? How hard would it be to start some sort of grass roots movement? Teachers can shut down schools, and UNION construction workers can disrupt my commute by shutting down construction projects if they don't get their yearly raises. A guy driving a very complex vibratory asphalt compactor makes more than some new regional captains, and most work seasonally.
None of this matters. You have already told the airlines you are willing to work for low pay. That's all you are going to get.

It just doesn't matter. You can fly a A380 around at Mesa and you are still only going to get 20,000 per year. You signed up for it. They know you will do it. Stop comparing yourself to others. Teachers and asphalt contractors are obviously more in demand than you are or know how to negotiate better. Alpa is begging your company to kick you in the face.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 08:41 PM
  #166  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
EXACTLY! They are "living in the past", which is "fostering hate" and "taking us nowhere". As soon as they want to treat everyone the same, then we can move forward...
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 08:43 PM
  #167  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A330Pilot
Reality is that you are brainless... Pilots have much more power than you think...The only thing holding them back in the U.S is the lack of organization...If everyone was to walk off the job for even one day- It would literally shut down America....This is what needs to happen...As far as Doctors and Lawyers, I know plenty of idiots in law and medicine so please do not even go there...
It won't make a difference, the company will simply say "ok the idiots got it out there system, now back to our regularly scheduled program".

Bottom line regional pilots are too young and dumb to even know what they are talking about. Most of you guys see this as a "problem" but the truth is this has been going on for 30 years. The only thing different is a new batch of pilots to say "hey this sucks". You'll soon be through it too and there will be a new batch of pilots coming in saying "hey we should do something about this".

Bottom line, pilots like to complain and b*tch alot but when it comes time to actually do anything meaningful, thats for someone else to do.

But don't worry, you are all going to get your big raises soon. And it has nothing to do with all your complaining, the union, or what your worth. It will simply boil down the lack of pilots and airlines having to compete for your talents. So when it comes, don't think you or alpa did anything at all special.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 08:57 PM
  #168  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

This is why you will never get better wages at the regionals...






Last edited by Fegelein; 08-17-2015 at 09:41 PM.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 09:07 PM
  #169  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
There are literally tens of thousands of <25 year olds chomping at the bit, to live in crash pad for 20+ days a month, fly a 121 jet, that are ready, willing, and able to work for cheap. They justify it with the rationale that it will just be a temporary "stepping stone" for them, because the stars in there eyes of making it to a major airline someday blind them to stark reality that tens of thousands of others have experienced.

This pool of labor will continue to undermine and devalue the efforts of the rest of the industry to raise compensation, not just at thier specific place of employ, but industry wide.
Reply
Old 08-17-2015 | 09:29 PM
  #170  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein
Your point is? Not a single pilot in that picture will ever fly for a US airline company. Ever. Most of them are under 99 year contracts to their respective sponsor company. If they fail any part of training, they will return home to work off that debt to said company by doing other jobs within the company.

They will go home and sit in the jumpseat and "observe" and maybe work the radios for around a year. They also start at around $60-70k US. Most of them also had trouble flying a Seminole.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JungleBus
Regional
272
04-10-2015 06:30 PM
dvhighdrive88
United
74
06-03-2013 07:34 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
17
10-30-2006 10:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices