Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2019, 10:18 AM
  #701  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 6
Default

The lawyers are licking their chops digging up all of these reports for ground of negligence.
Bluemoon20 is offline  
Old 06-03-2019, 03:55 PM
  #702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
Clearly.

All lies, all bad information, all shown to be false, in every case.
Donald, is that you?
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 04:01 AM
  #703  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Default

Hello, please excuse any lack of knowledge, I am only hear to see a pilots point of view, or anyone else who has a deep understanding.

My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
Firefighter is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 04:22 AM
  #704  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,025
Default

You're the "investor for Boeing" who sounds a little too much like a reporter, aren't you?
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 05:47 AM
  #705  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
Hello, please excuse any lack of knowledge, I am only hear to see a pilots point of view, or anyone else who has a deep understanding.

My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
I think it was pretty confusing for the crew as well. As folks have pointed out they could have helped their cause a lot by controlling thrust and airspeed. If they should be faulted for part of this, that's the part.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 06:46 AM
  #706  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,479
Default

Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
I am only hear to see a pilots point of view
What you're hearing is a lot of emotion in the wake of a sensor failure that possibly resulted in yet another, no survivor transport accident. Sensors are the eyes & ears of an automated flight control system. When direct, pilot to flight control/powerplant inputs are modified or augmented by faulted components, doesn't take much for confusion to become panic. Especially if no one bothered to let you know it could occur. Regardless the complex layers of contributing factors that are now being examined, this aircraft prime's senior leadership has proven remarkably tone deaf.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 07:05 AM
  #707  
Retired.
 
Csy Mon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 414
Default

. Especially if no one bothered to let you know it could occur.
The Ethiopian pilots were briefed on the system after the Lion Air accident.
Csy Mon is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 07:27 AM
  #708  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Seems that if the 737 had boosted elevator controls both crews would have been able to return their aircraft to level flight and hold it there with only moderate back pressure on the control column. That would have given them time to sort things out with the stabilizer runaway. Many things besides the MCAS system can cause a runaway trim system so it seems that the elevator boost should have been incorporated many 737 versions ago.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 09:03 AM
  #709  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,503
Default

Originally Posted by Csy Mon View Post
The Ethiopian pilots were briefed on the system after the Lion Air accident.
And for the LionAir flight, that was the fourth consecutive flight of that aircraft with a trim problem. One might have thought they would have had the defect actually REPAIRED, at least before a revenue flight.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 06-04-2019, 09:13 AM
  #710  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,025
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx View Post
Seems that if the 737 had boosted elevator controls both crews would have been able to return their aircraft to level flight and hold it there with only moderate back pressure on the control column. That would have given them time to sort things out with the stabilizer runaway. Many things besides the MCAS system can cause a runaway trim system so it seems that the elevator boost should have been incorporated many 737 versions ago.
Do you mean to say hydraulically powered flight controls, as in a hydraulic elevator? You're saying this wouldn't have happened if the 737 incorporated a hydraulically powered elevator?
JohnBurke is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices