Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash
#703
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Hello, please excuse any lack of knowledge, I am only hear to see a pilots point of view, or anyone else who has a deep understanding.
My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
#705
Hello, please excuse any lack of knowledge, I am only hear to see a pilots point of view, or anyone else who has a deep understanding.
My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
My question is, if the co pilot said he could not trim manually, so what would be the correct procedure from here? My understanding is that they reengaged the system which made the aircraft nose dive again. So overall I would think they should have just kept going about it the way they were? Or could this have been due to an inexperienced FO not trimming correctly? OR the tools they relied on were in fact experiencing problems leaving them with no other choice? Pretty confusing for someone like me so I’m just trying to get the best understanding.
#706
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,479
What you're hearing is a lot of emotion in the wake of a sensor failure that possibly resulted in yet another, no survivor transport accident. Sensors are the eyes & ears of an automated flight control system. When direct, pilot to flight control/powerplant inputs are modified or augmented by faulted components, doesn't take much for confusion to become panic. Especially if no one bothered to let you know it could occur. Regardless the complex layers of contributing factors that are now being examined, this aircraft prime's senior leadership has proven remarkably tone deaf.
#708
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Seems that if the 737 had boosted elevator controls both crews would have been able to return their aircraft to level flight and hold it there with only moderate back pressure on the control column. That would have given them time to sort things out with the stabilizer runaway. Many things besides the MCAS system can cause a runaway trim system so it seems that the elevator boost should have been incorporated many 737 versions ago.
#709
And for the LionAir flight, that was the fourth consecutive flight of that aircraft with a trim problem. One might have thought they would have had the defect actually REPAIRED, at least before a revenue flight.
#710
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,025
Seems that if the 737 had boosted elevator controls both crews would have been able to return their aircraft to level flight and hold it there with only moderate back pressure on the control column. That would have given them time to sort things out with the stabilizer runaway. Many things besides the MCAS system can cause a runaway trim system so it seems that the elevator boost should have been incorporated many 737 versions ago.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post