Ual 4933
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
I'm confused at why so much speculation is occurring? No-one hear knows what happened so why dont we just wait to find out. There isn't a reason to point fingers and lay blame with our current knowledge.I'm also sure if it was the pilots fault that there not happy it happened and anyone here saying o **** you messed up isn't helping.
#52
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 30
I'm confused at why so much speculation is occurring? No-one hear knows what happened so why dont we just wait to find out. There isn't a reason to point fingers and lay blame with our current knowledge.I'm also sure if it was the pilots fault that there not happy it happened and anyone here saying o **** you messed up isn't helping.
Until the NTSB has a report, S.T.F.U.
#53
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 18
I was part of the Pinnacle when Colgan 3407 happened. I thought Pinnacle/Colgan was getting shut down not long after, part of our training was changed because of it. Same goes for Pinnacle 3701. There was a much higher rate of Type ride bust after the crash.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
No disrespect, but I've noticed every time I hear C5 on the radio, either the crew is confused, transmitting with a barely intelligible heavy accent, getting yelled at by ATC, or it sounds like it's the FO's first day...what gives. Just my observations over the past 8 years in Newark. I know I'm not the only one noticing this.
#56
Banned
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Where there injuries? A total hull loss?
#57
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: B787 FO
I talked to a local asset in PQI who claims the plane never arrived on the runway...entire incident occurred off pavement, and it came to rest so far from the runway the first thing they needed were snowplows to access the crash site.
#58
"Have you ever been involved in an accident or incident or the subject of an investigation?"
The fear is that by answering "yes" to this question the computer scores you lower, or perhaps even disqualifies you automatically regardless of the details.
If a company has thousands of applications with 90% of them being incident/accident free, why waste time on those that have accidents or incidents?
Think about it from a HR perspective.
The fear is that by answering "yes" to this question the computer scores you lower, or perhaps even disqualifies you automatically regardless of the details.
If a company has thousands of applications with 90% of them being incident/accident free, why waste time on those that have accidents or incidents?
Think about it from a HR perspective.
Certainly a wreck won’t help, nor checkride busts or traffic tickets. But at least at Delta you won’t be eliminated from consideration by a computer if you mark “yes” to any of the questions asking about negative aspects of your career (which most of us have in our past by the time we’re competitive for the majors).
#59
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#60
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I'm saying the flow is not 100% reliable, if you get on their radar in a big way they will find a way to not flow you. Especially if we are talking AA... Has nothing to do with NTSB, they're not involved in hiring in any way, has more to do with what's on the six o'clock news.
But I do agree that flow is generally a good thing to have as a backup, unless you it's going to cost you a lot of money or QOL. If you hang out and wait to flow, as opposed to to trying to get out early, that will cost you a lot of money. Plus you never when flow might get cancelled, that's only happened two or three times before.
For clarity, I'm talking about flow and major hiring in general, not this particular accident specifically since they don't even have flow, ie not speculating. Flow is not an absolute in all cases, still better try to keep your nose clean. And get out early in case something happens to the flow.
But I do agree that flow is generally a good thing to have as a backup, unless you it's going to cost you a lot of money or QOL. If you hang out and wait to flow, as opposed to to trying to get out early, that will cost you a lot of money. Plus you never when flow might get cancelled, that's only happened two or three times before.
For clarity, I'm talking about flow and major hiring in general, not this particular accident specifically since they don't even have flow, ie not speculating. Flow is not an absolute in all cases, still better try to keep your nose clean. And get out early in case something happens to the flow.
Last edited by rickair7777; 03-06-2019 at 06:02 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM



