Ual 4933
#81
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Definitely glad everyone is alright.
#82
I'm not sure we're looking at the same photos...
I'm no investigator, but looking at those, there is no way they bounced off the runway to land over there, created those tracks, for that far, in that direction.... if they did, it was one heck of bounce.
You can see the initial impact in the photos, a bounce, and then the track to where it came to rest.
I'm no investigator, but looking at those, there is no way they bounced off the runway to land over there, created those tracks, for that far, in that direction.... if they did, it was one heck of bounce.
You can see the initial impact in the photos, a bounce, and then the track to where it came to rest.
#83
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,632
#84
But if UAL already wasn't happy with their performance, this would almost certainly give them a contractual out. If they're cheap and reliable, they might get a pass.
#85
In that case it does look like they landed to the side of the runway. As I said, I saw someone try it once. Is there a VASI on the right side of 01?
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Historically, no, the industry tends to sweep this sort of thing under the rug if they don't have 50+ corpses to explain away.
But if UAL already wasn't happy with their performance, this would almost certainly give them a contractual out. If they're cheap and reliable, they might get a pass.
But if UAL already wasn't happy with their performance, this would almost certainly give them a contractual out. If they're cheap and reliable, they might get a pass.
#87
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,632
Don't know about the VASI. Based on Airnav, it has none. But it has an ILS. Someone somewhere said the weather was 3/4SM visibility and OVC015, so I'd assume they were shooting the approach.
#88
Uh...from memory...looked this up right after it happened:
The ILS is to runway 01.
There is a full MALSR.
I think the PAPI for runway 19 was NOTAM'd OAS..? Don't remember.
If you pull the 'historical' WX from NWS page, right about the time of their arrival, the vis went down to 1/2 mi.
The ILS is to runway 01.
There is a full MALSR.
I think the PAPI for runway 19 was NOTAM'd OAS..? Don't remember.
If you pull the 'historical' WX from NWS page, right about the time of their arrival, the vis went down to 1/2 mi.
Last edited by cursesRedBaron; 03-06-2019 at 03:07 PM. Reason: Corrected PAPI - for runway 19
#89
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,632
Uh...from memory...looked this up right after it happened:
The ILS is to runway 01.
There is a full MALSR.
I think the PAPI was NOTAM'd OAS..? Don't remember.
If you pull the 'historical' WX from NWS page, right about the time of their arrival, the vis went down to 1/2 mi.
The ILS is to runway 01.
There is a full MALSR.
I think the PAPI was NOTAM'd OAS..? Don't remember.
If you pull the 'historical' WX from NWS page, right about the time of their arrival, the vis went down to 1/2 mi.
In "whiteout" conditions, flying a visual approach, I would almost understand how you land off runway like that.
But from an ILS with low visibility?
#90
Maybe the lights timed out right as they were on final?
Just brainstorming...but, an unmonitored airport would likely have pilot controlled lighting...might 'time out' right about the end of a second approach?
With the lights off...I could see flat light conditions with all the snow.
Just brainstorming...but, an unmonitored airport would likely have pilot controlled lighting...might 'time out' right about the end of a second approach?
With the lights off...I could see flat light conditions with all the snow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM