Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Plane off runway at Hobby >

Plane off runway at Hobby

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Plane off runway at Hobby

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2013, 05:59 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Noseeums View Post
Perhaps he was too busy to mind that pesky taxiway line (they're for noobs anyway) and instead was giving the FO some life advice or lecture about:

1. The economy and what we have to do to fix it
2. How minorities and women pilots always get hired to mainline first
3. Some great penny stock he just put his life savings into
4. How he used to be addicted to crack, but turned his life around a Gulfstream Flight Academy
5. How he failed in everything else in life until this seniority-based promotion system gave him the opportunity to make $90,000/year with no education and no accountability
6. Some pointless rant about how some hotel didn't have stale toast and bagels this morning
7. How he doesn't understand why we have to do things the (insert airline name here) way
8. The impending pilot shortage. We're all going to be 797 captains!
9. His pretend "flow" to Delta, a shrinking airline

10. Add your own! This will be fun!
11. The career progression at Colgan was to die for, I mean, Beech 1900s, SAAB's, Q's, 200's, and 900's, this is amazing!

12. I don't know why they paint taxi lines to begin with, all you have to do is stay on the pavement.... uh, errr, wooops!
One Up is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 06:05 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

As far as the public is concerned, it's a Delta plane.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 06:13 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gearswinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 465
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL View Post
Maybe. It didn't come across as sarcasm at all, in the face of numerous accusations that Colgan pilots were bringing down the safety record. It appears he was serious, and full of bologna...
Really? You must be a joy to be around if you can't get that level of sarcasm.

Colgan pilots going to the CRJ got the exact same full initial training as every other pilot who is now flying at Pinnacle. Anyone saying that Colgan pilots can't handle a CRJ is ridiculous, they have been through the exact same training and passed the exact same checking events as every other guy sitting in a CRJ at Pinnacle. If anything, the Colgan guy might end up having better navigation skills than an original Pinnacle guy, just because flying a Beech or a Saab with /A required solid VOR and chart reading skills to get where you needed to go, as opposed to the simplicity of navigating with a GPS and FMS.

And yes, I speak from experience. I am just another Colgan lowlife who got displaced from the Saab. Yet somehow I've managed to not bend metal, get lost, stall the plane, or have any other huge difficulties learning a new plane. It's no different than any other guy newly coming to a CRJ from a Saab or Q. There is a learning curve, the key is to be humble and get guidance from the guy in the other seat who has invariably been sitting in a CRJ for longer than I have.
Gearswinger is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 06:44 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

I heard the CA was trying to make a youtube video of the fightcrew doing the Harlem Shake to a techno version of The Commodore's "nightshift" while they were taxiing.
mooney is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 07:51 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
swamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by Gearswinger View Post
Really? You must be a joy to be around if you can't get that level of sarcasm.

Colgan pilots going to the CRJ got the exact same full initial training as every other pilot who is now flying at Pinnacle. Anyone saying that Colgan pilots can't handle a CRJ is ridiculous, they have been through the exact same training and passed the exact same checking events as every other guy sitting in a CRJ at Pinnacle. If anything, the Colgan guy might end up having better navigation skills than an original Pinnacle guy, just because flying a Beech or a Saab with /A required solid VOR and chart reading skills to get where you needed to go, as opposed to the simplicity of navigating with a GPS and FMS.

And yes, I speak from experience. I am just another Colgan lowlife who got displaced from the Saab. Yet somehow I've managed to not bend metal, get lost, stall the plane, or have any other huge difficulties learning a new plane. It's no different than any other guy newly coming to a CRJ from a Saab or Q. There is a learning curve, the key is to be humble and get guidance from the guy in the other seat who has invariably been sitting in a CRJ for longer than I have.
Your missing what most of us are complaining about. When pinnacle guys were hired at pinnacle we were hired as FO's not Captains. The few off the street CA we hired in 07/08 all had previous experience on the CRJ. We now have Colgan guys who have 0 Jet experience commanding a Jet. Most reasonable people would agree, these Colgan guys should have at least sat in the right seat of the RJ for at least 6 months. Beating a dead horse, but your argument that a Colgan Ca right out of training, is just as capable of flying the RJ as well as a 9E or XJ guy with years of experience is ridiculous.
swamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 08:08 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flapsfail's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL View Post
Maybe. It didn't come across as sarcasm at all, in the face of numerous accusations that Colgan pilots were bringing down the safety record. It appears he was serious, and full of bologna...
Really? You must be a joy to be around if you can't get that level of sarcasm.

Colgan pilots going to the CRJ got the exact same full initial training as every other pilot who is now flying at Pinnacle. Anyone saying that Colgan pilots can't handle a CRJ is ridiculous, they have been through the exact same training and passed the exact same checking events as every other guy sitting in a CRJ at Pinnacle. If anything, the Colgan guy might end up having better navigation skills than an original Pinnacle guy, just because flying a Beech or a Saab with /A required solid VOR and chart reading skills to get where you needed to go, as opposed to the simplicity of navigating with a GPS and FMS.

And yes, I speak from experience. I am just another Colgan lowlife who got displaced from the Saab. Yet somehow I've managed to not bend metal, get lost, stall the plane, or have any other huge difficulties learning a new plane. It's no different than any other guy newly coming to a CRJ from a Saab or Q. There is a learning curve, the key is to be humble and get guidance from the guy in the other seat who has invariably been sitting in a CRJ for longer than I have.
At least you are humble & professional enough in your last two sentences to acknowledge what should be done. However, my experience hasn't been like that with the few that I've flown with. Basic stuff that isn't being completed or taken care of makes it very difficult and frustrating. As I mentioned on another post, there have been many pilots getting a lot of IOE and if one can't get it done after 25-50 hrs they shouldn't be sitting in the left seat. 125 hrs of IOE is ridiculous...
flapsfail is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 08:36 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL View Post
Maybe. It didn't come across as sarcasm at all, in the face of numerous accusations that Colgan pilots were bringing down the safety record. It appears he was serious, and full of bologna...
Really? You must be a joy to be around if you can't get that level of sarcasm.
My apologies. It was early in the morning and I missed the whole last sentence. I'm an idiot!

Carry on...
STR8NLVL is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 09:07 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ultralight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 611
Default

Remember this?

http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2008/AAR0802.pdf

This was a Pinnacle check airman doing IOE.

Those that poke fun at this kind of thing have yet to be humbled.

People make mistakes and hopefully learn from them. If the guy was returning to the gate he was likely distracted. Add that it was dark and the F.O. was probably trying to contact ops and you have a perfect T.E.M. scenario.

I doubt it has anything to do with the captain being unable to control the aircraft.
Ultralight is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 09:31 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 118
Default

Originally Posted by swamp View Post
Your missing what most of us are complaining about. When pinnacle guys were hired at pinnacle we were hired as FO's not Captains. The few off the street CA we hired in 07/08 all had previous experience on the CRJ. We now have Colgan guys who have 0 Jet experience commanding a Jet. Most reasonable people would agree, these Colgan guys should have at least sat in the right seat of the RJ for at least 6 months. Beating a dead horse, but your argument that a Colgan Ca right out of training, is just as capable of flying the RJ as well as a 9E or XJ guy with years of experience is ridiculous.
No dog in this fight but ExpressJet did this for a number of years. EMB-120 to the ERJ as Captain. ATR to the ERJ as Captain. 1900 to the ERJ as Captain. All with a pretty solid safety record I may add. (for the most part)
missingbite is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 11:14 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,447
Default

Jets MUST be tougher to taxi. Do they have the tendency to roll backwards while in beta?
Saabs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 05:02 PM
USMCFLYR
Safety
2
09-14-2012 04:04 AM
Jack Bauer
Major
36
01-01-2010 04:42 PM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
2
07-30-2005 07:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices