Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Training issues at SKW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2019, 03:16 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,483
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
These are the types of situations that Training Review Boards are made for. A committee of people from both sides (management and union) look at the facts of the situation in concert with the trainee and come up with a plan that all agree on, not forced upon the trainee as a take it or leave it deal.
Even for new hires? I thought that probationary pilots were not afforded union protections.
word302 is offline  
Old 02-26-2019, 03:20 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

You assume a mutual exclusivity between the two because?
captive apple is offline  
Old 02-26-2019, 04:49 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by word302 View Post
Even for new hires? I thought that probationary pilots were not afforded union protections.
My shop (ALPA) is highly involved in new hire training. You are covered by the contract from day 1.
Varsity is offline  
Old 02-26-2019, 05:16 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
These are the types of situations that Training Review Boards are made for. A committee of people from both sides (management and union) look at the facts of the situation in concert with the trainee and come up with a plan that all agree on, not forced upon the trainee as a take it or leave it deal.
SkyWest does have a training review board...

Really OO has a ton of programs, HIMS,WAC, pro standards, ect... only thing we lack is National support...
amcnd is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 09:55 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
SkyWest does have a training review board...

Really OO has a ton of programs, HIMS,WAC, pro standards, ect... only thing we lack is National support...
Yes, thanks ALPA
gojo is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 02:10 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by word302 View Post
Even for new hires? I thought that probationary pilots were not afforded union protections.

Probationary Pilots (typically new hires within 365 days from DOH) are afforded all the rights within the contract (they enjoy all work rules pay rates, etc, in the contract) except for one, they are unable to send a disciplinary grievance to arbitration. Meaning, they can grieve anything, but can not make their case before and arbitrator to keep their job.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 02:26 PM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default Training issues at SKW

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
SkyWest does have a training review board...



Really OO has a ton of programs, HIMS,WAC, pro standards, ect... only thing we lack is National support...

The problem with many of these programs without a union is that there is a conflict of interest. When you have one entity financially supporting another entity which has different constituents and therefore sometimes divergent concerns, the one side supporting the other has all the leverage.

If you want national support, you need to have a successful representation vote overseen by the NMB. Then all these programs that pilot unions came up with (HIMS, ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, TRB, pro standards, known crewmember, CIRP, aeromedical, P4P, pilot assistance, etc) will be fully funded and defended with only your pilots’ interest in mind.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 02:59 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
The problem with many of these programs without a union is that there is a conflict of interest. When you have one entity financially supporting another entity which has different constituents and therefore sometimes divergent concerns, the one side supporting the other has all the leverage.

If you want national support, you need to have a successful representation vote overseen by the NMB. Then all these programs that pilot unions came up with (HIMS, ASAP, FOQA, LOSA, TRB, pro standards, known crewmember, CIRP, aeromedical, P4P, pilot assistance, etc) will be fully funded and defended with only your pilots’ interest in mind.
A lot of these seem to have been put in place at OO around the '07 drive in an effort to stop it from succeeding (I wasn't here then, so I could be wrong). Seems to just be a band-aid. Hopefully ALPA is successful this time around because I feel we are really missing out on a lot of great resources. A group of 5,000 pilots could really be influential on the national level when it comes to representing the regional side of the business.
savedbythevnav is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 03:43 PM
  #169  
Line Holder
 
thaddiusMbuggs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by savedbythevnav View Post
A group of 5,000 pilots could really be influential on the national level when it comes to representing the regional side of the business.
Agreed. There is power in numbers.

I know plenty of people at smaller airlines have had experiences with ALPA (in their opinions) not being overly helpful etc... But I ask, how many of you were working for airlines with the numbers we are talking here? ALPA isn't stupid...they won't bite the hands that feed them, and 5000+ new hands is a lot of food and plenty of reason to do all they can to be a positive force for SKW and in turn the regionals.

That being said, after the pay package it seems all the folks who were pushing hard for a union have quietened. I for one would like to see ALPA get on board at SKW and think the positives outweigh the negatives, but it just seems like people who were for it have stopped caring so much about the drive. Suspect SAPA will be all the representation we have for the foreseeable future.

*Just an opinion before anyone starts coming after me with torches and pitchforks*
thaddiusMbuggs is offline  
Old 02-27-2019, 06:11 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by savedbythevnav View Post
A group of 5,000 pilots could really be influential on the national level when it comes to representing the regional side of the business.
Not going to argue with that, but I would ask - why ALPA in particular? At the regional level, from what I've seen on other sections here, ALPA isn't universally loved and in fact a good argument can be made that ALPA is exactly the wrong group to represent any regional because it is a conflict of interest with their representation of mainline pilots.
bradthepilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BFMthisA10
Air Wisconsin
24
11-03-2021 08:12 PM
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
okieskies99
United
4
07-03-2017 11:55 PM
blaquehawk99
Flight Schools and Training
29
06-11-2015 09:51 AM
Nevets
Regional
80
07-30-2009 07:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices