Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Training issues at SKW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2019, 06:57 PM
  #171  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,468
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
Not going to argue with that, but I would ask - why ALPA in particular? At the regional level, from what I've seen on other sections here, ALPA isn't universally loved and in fact a good argument can be made that ALPA is exactly the wrong group to represent any regional because it is a conflict of interest with their representation of mainline pilots.
Now when ALPA is not 100% DL ran, things might actually change. I have high hopes for Captain Joe DePete and his term.
dera is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 12:31 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default Training issues at SKW

Originally Posted by thaddiusMbuggs View Post
Agreed. There is power in numbers.



I know plenty of people at smaller airlines have had experiences with ALPA (in their opinions) not being overly helpful etc... But I ask, how many of you were working for airlines with the numbers we are talking here? ALPA isn't stupid...they won't bite the hands that feed them, and 5000+ new hands is a lot of food and plenty of reason to do all they can to be a positive force for SKW and in turn the regionals.



That being said, after the pay package it seems all the folks who were pushing hard for a union have quietened. I for one would like to see ALPA get on board at SKW and think the positives outweigh the negatives, but it just seems like people who were for it have stopped caring so much about the drive. Suspect SAPA will be all the representation we have for the foreseeable future.



*Just an opinion before anyone starts coming after me with torches and pitchforks*
This is why I try to make the case that a union, ALPA in particular, is more than just a pay package. A union advocates for ALL aspects of an airline pilots’ career. So when it comes to safety and security initiatives especially, ALPA is the only pilot union to go with, not to mention aeromedical and a myriad of other areas.



Originally Posted by savedbythevnav View Post
A lot of these seem to have been put in place at OO around the '07 drive in an effort to stop it from succeeding (I wasn't here then, so I could be wrong). Seems to just be a band-aid. Hopefully ALPA is successful this time around because I feel we are really missing out on a lot of great resources. A group of 5,000 pilots could really be influential on the national level when it comes to representing the regional side of the business.
That’s a really good point. A pilot size like Skywest would get an executive Vice President at ALPA National. They would be the only regional with their own representative at that level.


Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
Not going to argue with that, but I would ask - why ALPA in particular? At the regional level, from what I've seen on other sections here, ALPA isn't universally loved and in fact a good argument can be made that ALPA is exactly the wrong group to represent any regional because it is a conflict of interest with their representation of mainline pilots.

This is the biggest misconception with ALPA. Each ALPA pilot group is represented by their own MEC elected only by their own pilots. Their MEC is the only entity with fiduciary responsibility to their pilots. No other MEC or national can compel any other MEC to anything, period. Jus like the Skywest MEC wouldn’t be able to tell any other MEC to do something they don’t want. Mainline MECs decide what scope they want to negotiate, no one else. If they won’t or can’t scope in all their flying, some of their airlines’ flying is put out to bid. Then regional management comes in and submits bids for this flying. Mainline management chooses the winner(s). Now the regional MEC, who to this point has had no say on what gets outsourced or who wins the bid, negotiates with their regional management on the terms and pay of this flying. Mainline MEC cannot tell the regional MEC not to negotiated for $200/hr pay rates or anything else.


No conflict of interest anywhere in that process.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 04-17-2019, 08:21 PM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

Originally Posted by Cefiro View Post
Something about this doesn’t sound right. Why would he have to redo ground school if he already passed the SV? Also, you take the PV before you ever go into the sim so why would he need additional sim sessions if he was never recommended for the PV?

That first question is one for the training department. All I know is that was the deal they offered him.

And my class (those of us sent to ATL, anyway) did all our procedures training in the sim.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 04-17-2019, 09:04 PM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
At the regional level, from what I've seen on other sections here, ALPA isn't universally loved and in fact a good argument can be made that ALPA is exactly the wrong group to represent any regional because it is a conflict of interest with their representation of mainline pilots.
I suspect you might be under a mistaken assumption or two as to how ALPA works. ALPA National does not do the negotiating for their member carriers, the member carriers’ pilot groups do. ALPA provides the training for those pilot negotiators and the legal and financial analysis experts to back them up. There is no conflict of interest.

ALPA is in fact the best choice for SkyWest pilots because of its size. Think of ALPA as a pooled resource. Lots of members = more resources, all of which would be available to the SkyWest pilot group.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 02:10 AM
  #175  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Default

How about non-technical issues in training at OO? Do people routinely get sent home for uniform/dress code violations or for not being sufficiently respectful of their instructors? Or for visible tattoos, being 30 seconds late to class, etc.?
OOnewb is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 02:57 AM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by OOnewb View Post
How about non-technical issues in training at OO? Do people routinely get sent home for uniform/dress code violations or for not being sufficiently respectful of their instructors? Or for visible tattoos, being 30 seconds late to class, etc.?
For most of what you wrote, I certainly hope so. For being late, no. I guess if you showed up habitually late they might.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 03:03 AM
  #177  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Default

Do they not use the break timer for OO pilots in training? Where it counts down from 15, 10, or 5 minutes and you have to be in the door by the time it hits 00:00 or you get written up?
OOnewb is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:24 AM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by OOnewb View Post
Do they not use the break timer for OO pilots in training? Where it counts down from 15, 10, or 5 minutes and you have to be in the door by the time it hits 00:00 or you get written up?
Please don’t suggest this.
captive apple is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:28 AM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

Originally Posted by OOnewb View Post
Do they not use the break timer for OO pilots in training? Where it counts down from 15, 10, or 5 minutes and you have to be in the door by the time it hits 00:00 or you get written up?
I have no idea what your even talking about!!! (But OO flight attendant new hires do...)
amcnd is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:51 AM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

The environment in new hire class is welcoming. If you are late, you owe $5 for the end of class pizza party. Same for having a cellphone go off in class.

I never saw anyone who was not dressed correctly or didn’t meet grooming standards. There was a guy who went to upgrade class with a man bun. He definitely got in trouble, since he had already been talked to on the line.
zondaracer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BFMthisA10
Air Wisconsin
24
11-03-2021 08:12 PM
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
okieskies99
United
4
07-03-2017 11:55 PM
blaquehawk99
Flight Schools and Training
29
06-11-2015 09:51 AM
Nevets
Regional
80
07-30-2009 07:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices