Skywest
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Dumb question, and I realize the much broader implications here BUT isn't the proposed profit sharing program based on SkyWest Airlines segment profit contribution only? (not XJET, or Inc.) In other words, wouldn't a stock-buyback program only effect Inc.'s bottom line (after SKW Airlines's segment profit has already been posted on the income statement?)
I think this is an important distinction, before everybody starts jumping off bridges here.
I think this is an important distinction, before everybody starts jumping off bridges here.
"SkyWest is authorized to repurchase shares at prevailing market prices in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws, as deemed appropriate by SkyWest management."
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 146
Dumb question, and I realize the much broader implications here BUT isn't the proposed profit sharing program based on SkyWest Airlines segment profit contribution only? (not XJET, or Inc.) In other words, wouldn't a stock-buyback program only effect Inc.'s bottom line (after SKW Airlines's segment profit has already been posted on the income statement?)
I think this is an important distinction, before everybody starts jumping off bridges here.
I think this is an important distinction, before everybody starts jumping off bridges here.
Execs benefiting from short-term manipulations based on info not available to other shareholders: probably not legal.
Generally they can play games with the stock as long as all shareholders benefit/suffer equally.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Execs benefiting from the long-term health/well-being of the company: legal.
Execs benefiting from short-term manipulations based on info not available to other shareholders: probably not legal.
Generally they can play games with the stock as long as all shareholders benefit/suffer equally.
Execs benefiting from short-term manipulations based on info not available to other shareholders: probably not legal.
Generally they can play games with the stock as long as all shareholders benefit/suffer equally.
They are buying stock to pump up the stock price to make them either less desirable for another airline to try and buy them or if someone decides to pull the trigger at least the shareholders make a tidy sum off the sale. It's the same reason the cash on hand has gone down recently. You don't want to have a $5 a share stock price and $800M in the bank right now
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
No law needs to be broken. This would a tort claim in the civil system (better review your first-year lawschool textbooks again).
A professional labor lawyer would be needed to determine the best venue, but the CA civil system pops out as glaringly obvious...lots of SKW pilots live and employed in CA, labor friendly judges & juries, and no close ties to any particular church. A win there might not legally help the UT crowd but it would be hard for the company to pay out only to the Cali peeps...
Not as elegant as the NMB system by any means but I'm willing to bet it's a mess that Inc would really like to avoid. They might get multiple suits in multiple states...good times.
A professional labor lawyer would be needed to determine the best venue, but the CA civil system pops out as glaringly obvious...lots of SKW pilots live and employed in CA, labor friendly judges & juries, and no close ties to any particular church. A win there might not legally help the UT crowd but it would be hard for the company to pay out only to the Cali peeps...
Not as elegant as the NMB system by any means but I'm willing to bet it's a mess that Inc would really like to avoid. They might get multiple suits in multiple states...good times.
This is false. No one at a union airline songs any such thing. Even my previous non-union air carrier didn't require us to do this.
Right, raises the barrier and makes one a less desirable target. That's legal and I'm all for it. As bad as everyone thinks SGU is at least they want to be running an airline, Far better than some outfit which specializes in buying companies, extracting cash, dismantling and selling the parts for scrap value.
Sounds a lot like a company in st George, buying a company, extracting cash, dismantling and selling the parts for scraps. What? Doesn't fit the narrative of the benevolent management that is at George?
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
I'll repost:
"I'm just asking a question. I didn't intend for you to get defensive about it. I'm curious if you are a pilot at Skywest or any other regional for that matter? Or are you a dispatcher or something else for Skywest? I honestly don't think that the supposed Skywest dispatchers on this board are really dispatchers. So which is it? No judging, promise."
First of all, I don't care if you judge me whatsoever. Actually, I don't ever specify on any boards who I work for or what I do. I find it more entertaining to watch people pretend they know it all, and are able to tell me what I do and where I work. I am a pilot, a dispatcher, a crew scheduler, an executive, a lav dumper, and a mechanic. That answer your question?
"I'm just asking a question. I didn't intend for you to get defensive about it. I'm curious if you are a pilot at Skywest or any other regional for that matter? Or are you a dispatcher or something else for Skywest? I honestly don't think that the supposed Skywest dispatchers on this board are really dispatchers. So which is it? No judging, promise."
First of all, I don't care if you judge me whatsoever. Actually, I don't ever specify on any boards who I work for or what I do. I find it more entertaining to watch people pretend they know it all, and are able to tell me what I do and where I work. I am a pilot, a dispatcher, a crew scheduler, an executive, a lav dumper, and a mechanic. That answer your question?
You have still failed to answer the question. No one else here feels the need to hide what they do, dispatchers included. In fact, I get a lot more insight from dispatchers than from pilots. And that's because they have a different perspective than I do. So who do you work for and what do you do for them?
You have still failed to answer the question. No one else here feels the need to hide what they do, dispatchers included. In fact, I get a lot more insight from dispatchers than from pilots. And that's because they have a different perspective than I do. So who do you work for and what do you do for them?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
So how did the vote go? Did the voting period end today?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post