Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2015, 10:00 AM
  #10481  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
Don't forget all the instructors also show up as FOs/CAs and at this point in time do 0 flying.
Yeah, that would push it down closer to the historical average of 5 per seat.
Utah is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 11:52 AM
  #10482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Last month in schoolhouse they said they needed to up the amount of people in 175 class but weren't currently able to because of instructors
Squallrider is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 03:37 PM
  #10483  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by DD214 View Post
It's no secret we have been behind the power curve with regards to staffing. That's nothing new. The balance we need is not to run too fat or too lean finding that balance is almost impossible because our staffing requirements is dynamic. So yes while we are chronically staffed on all airframes we are working on getting that fixed. Reference SL on the conference call yesterday!
If reliability is important (apparently it is nowdays) airlines need to staff properly for the worst times of year (ie Thanksgiving/Xmas/Summer) and run fat the rest of the year. It takes too long to hire/train pilots and they can't furlough us seasonally.

But they often try to do the opposite, with predictable results. Pilots tend to be family men/women and often don't want to pull a bunch of OT over the holiday and summer seasons.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 04:59 PM
  #10484  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
Think we're just over halfway. More flying to come you can bet on it

For who? Alaska?
Nevets is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 05:41 PM
  #10485  
Gets Weekends Off
 
skypilot35's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: It's hot out here.
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Lots of airframes that have not been assigned...Going to be for somebody...
The only thing that is certain is that we are parking 11 200's by summer's end. Anything else is speculation.
skypilot35 is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 06:00 PM
  #10486  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
For who? Alaska?
Flying for Alaska airframe number wise will stay same but Skywest trying to get Alaska to swap 700s for 175s, apparently that's final stages, heard that from MT. Other rumors are 10 more 175 for United as well as possible delta flying by swapping 900s for 175s. A company does not invest millions of dollars on 2-3 simulators to just get 50 odd planes.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  #10487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Lots of airframes that have not been assigned...Going to be for somebody...
Not unless we can sign a new contract. Hopefully that will happen, but lighten up on the koolaid.
Utah is offline  
Old 05-26-2015, 07:10 PM
  #10488  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Contract will make us more expensive, it's the possibility of staffing that will get us RFPs, of course the proposed agreement would have done that but if I've learned anything in these forums it's drop the upgrade time and they will come. Of course you'd need a lot of flying with such a big pilot group for that to happen so we shall see
Squallrider is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 08:41 AM
  #10489  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Default

Do one of you skywest guys have a current recruiter's email / contact info I have some questions id like to ask them please PM me if you do. Thanks in advance .
ComancheGuy is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 10:34 AM
  #10490  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Lots of airframes that have not been assigned...Going to be for somebody...

But those are "conditional" airframes. In other words, they don't have to be assigned if there is no "new" flying. Or am I getting it mixed up with something else?

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
Flying for Alaska airframe number wise will stay same but Skywest trying to get Alaska to swap 700s for 175s, apparently that's final stages, heard that from MT. Other rumors are 10 more 175 for United as well as possible delta flying by swapping 900s for 175s. A company does not invest millions of dollars on 2-3 simulators to just get 50 odd planes.
So Alaska and delta like the 175 better than the 700s and 900s? Who owns those 700s and 900s? As for UAL, I thought they were maxed out on scope already. I don't remember anymore.



Originally Posted by Utah View Post
Not unless we can sign a new contract. Hopefully that will happen, but lighten up on the koolaid.

Who says you need a new "contract" to get new RFPs. Look at rah or xjt.
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices