Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2015 | 08:11 AM
  #9981  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ClickClickBoom
you will slip up and someone who isn't so enamored with your mean spirited banter will "out" you to your co workers after seeing you post in a plane or crew room. See how a failed AQP segment or line check with associated special tracking does for your career. .l.
It that what happened to you bruh? When do I get to see the 25 year pic on SWOL?
Old 04-16-2015 | 09:03 AM
  #9982  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Calls me a moron, and then cannot even spell my user name right....

Username is one word
Old 04-16-2015 | 10:42 AM
  #9983  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Hey let me ask you...how concerned were you with the rest of the employees that lost their careers and livelihoods when the Comair fellas ran that airline into the ground?
I was very concerned and saddened for the employees of Comair to watch that once top-tier regional operation slowly implode in on itself and eventually shut down. They were the pinnacle of the Regional industry for many years.

While I totally get the irritation that some feel with Nevets and those like him, and I agree he needs to just stop, I feel that it is simply classless to wish for them and thousands of their fellow employees to just lose their livelihoods.
Old 04-16-2015 | 02:44 PM
  #9984  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
As usual you are wrong.

No, I was there on the MEC. I had a front row seat in 2008. Cal used Skywest to whipsaw their pilots against xjt. The cal operation (now UAL) has been unprofitable since then.

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Best way to fix the turd is to let it fizzle out and die

Fix? There is nothing to fix. This was more or less their game plan. At worst, it was their plan b. Good thing I have mine.

Originally Posted by Squallrider
It's not that I want them to fail, I have a loads of friends there that went there when it was the flavor of the month. nevets with the constant " rah rah Union rah rah " or "you're riding our coat tails" rhetoric is more annoying especially considering they haven't been profitable in many years and are being sustained by the other side of the house. When I was based in IAH there was a clear disdain from expressjet pilots for us "taking their flying" even to the point that they were refusing jump seats. I think it's normal when people comes into our thread bashing that they will get it back.

We haven't been profitable in many years because our CEO whipsawed you against us. It's only annoying to you because it's true. And it's the reason why you should go union, to actually help the situation instead of just being spectators. It's Skywest Inc's fault that xjt isn't profitable, not xjt pilots. And the fact that xjt is losing money is NOT making you get paid any less. So I don't understand why you even you even bring up who sustains who. The fact of the matter is that all of us work for the same shareholders, the same BOD, the same CEO, the same president, the same EVP. The money that is made or lost all goes in the same pile. The only reason why there are two separate airlines is to suppress your wages and mine. As soon as you can admit that, we will be on the same page.

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Hey let me ask you...how concerned were you with the rest of the employees that lost their careers and livelihoods when the Comair fellas ran that airline into the ground?

Comair fellas ran that airline into the ground. I know that when you say comair fellas you really mean Delta management.
Old 04-16-2015 | 03:08 PM
  #9985  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
No, I was there on the MEC. I had a front row seat in 2008. Cal used Skywest to whipsaw their pilots against xjt. The cal operation (now UAL) has been unprofitable since then.

p what you have and because you can't compete you lose flying.



Fix? There is nothing to fix. This was more or less their game plan. At worst, it was their plan b. Good thing I have mine.




We haven't been profitable in many years because our CEO whipsawed you against us. It's only annoying to you because it's true. And it's the reason why you should go union, to actually help the situation instead of just being spectators. It's Skywest Inc's fault that xjt isn't profitable, not xjt pilots. And the fact that xjt is losing money is NOT making you get paid any less. So I don't understand why you even you even bring up who sustains who. The fact of the matter is that all of us work for the same shareholders, the same BOD, the same CEO, the same president, the same EVP. The money that is made or lost all goes in the same pile. The only reason why there are two separate airlines is to suppress your wages and mine. As soon as you can admit that, we will be on the same page.




Comair fellas ran that airline into the ground. I know that when you say comair fellas you really mean Delta management.
Doesn't pay me more or less because expressjet costs inc money...however it doesn't deteriorate the companies long term viability, something that is more important than a few dollars which is what expressjet hasn't figured out. Your contracts are not sustainable in the regional market but you'll fight management to the death to kewow something that's not sustainable, you lose flying you go out of business. Inc doesn't win by expressjet going out of business but they can't keep a operation going that keeps losing money. Investors have been asking what are you going to do about expressjet every earnings call I've been on. The last one the answer was the same as before "try negotiate with United" but they added winding down unprofitable flying.
Old 04-16-2015 | 03:28 PM
  #9986  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
We haven't been profitable in many years because our CEO whipsawed you against us. It's only annoying to you because it's true. And it's the reason why you should go union, to actually help the situation instead of just being spectators. It's Skywest Inc's fault that xjt isn't profitable, not xjt pilots. And the fact that xjt is losing money is NOT making you get paid any less. So I don't understand why you even you even bring up who sustains who. The fact of the matter is that all of us work for the same shareholders, the same BOD, the same CEO, the same president, the same EVP. The money that is made or lost all goes in the same pile. The only reason why there are two separate airlines is to suppress your wages and mine. As soon as you can admit that, we will be on the same page.
Yeah it is all your guys fault that my bonuses have went down!! Oh wait, I guess my low wages and lack of work rules allows Inc to purchases other airlines (i.e. Air Meekong) but if that would have made money, I'm positive they would have shared it with us pilots.

As soon as pilots realize that operations are such a small drop in the bucket, we won't see any significant gains in pay packages. Hell, I can give myself more of a raise on each trip by flying the block than I will get out of this upcoming offer. I have lost more than 2% in QOL each year just by SW making up their own interpretations of 117 and the PBS buffers they use. But since it cost them about $6 to have me sit at the airport for 4 hours, they will schedule the trips that way. There is no reason we should be this many years into 117 and not be able to stack trips.

Would any of this change with a union? Maybe not. But it really is tiresome to hear our pilot group act like it would put the company under to pay me for the hours I am away from my family. There is so much waste with duplicate management and outdated equipment (we still do payroll with an f'ing excel sheet), but whatever we do, let's not make any changes. Just keep telling the pilots how expensive they are.
Old 04-16-2015 | 04:46 PM
  #9987  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default Skywest

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Doesn't pay me more or less because expressjet costs inc money...however it doesn't deteriorate the companies long term viability, something that is more important than a few dollars which is what expressjet hasn't figured out. Your contracts are not sustainable in the regional market but you'll fight management to the death to kewow something that's not sustainable, you lose flying you go out of business. Inc doesn't win by expressjet going out of business but they can't keep a operation going that keeps losing money. Investors have been asking what are you going to do about expressjet every earnings call I've been on. The last one the answer was the same as before "try negotiate with United" but they added winding down unprofitable flying.

I think you meant to say that it DOES deteriorate long term viability. And I'm saying that that isn't xjt pilots' fault. It was our CEO that decided to whipsaw us in 2008 which made xjt unprofitable. And it was our CEO who decided to actually buy xjt in 2010 after he had negotiated a money losing CPA that you correctly say is not sustainable. And it's our CEO who decided to keep us separate in order to suppress your wages and mine. So why should we pay for our CEO's mistakes and his willingness to pit his employees against each other? Was is it you don't get about that? I've even said that we were open to concessionary negotiations if it meant a complete merger. But our CEO's corporate culture gets in the way of that. That's all I'm saying. And like I already said, we are not trying to burn anything down. For example, we are negotiating PBS work rules to implement onto our contract BEFORE getting a joint contact with the CRJ side. We are willing to work with management in mutually agreeable way. It's actually our CEO that has done more damage to xjt than any employee group has. Lastly, I believe that the death nail was hammered into place when our MEC decided to roll over in 2010. I know they have no problems winding down xjt if things don't turn around and I'm ok with that. I'm not married to this company nor career. I just feel bad for the others who don't have a back up plan. It's said that corporate culture may end up harming thousands of families. And for what? Just to keep us from making a bit more or getting some better work rules. All in order to make some institutional shareholders some more money.


Originally Posted by disillusioned
Yeah it is all your guys fault that my bonuses have went down!! Oh wait, I guess my low wages and lack of work rules allows Inc to purchases other airlines (i.e. Air Meekong) but if that would have made money, I'm positive they would have shared it with us pilots.



As soon as pilots realize that operations are such a small drop in the bucket, we won't see any significant gains in pay packages. Hell, I can give myself more of a raise on each trip by flying the block than I will get out of this upcoming offer. I have lost more than 2% in QOL each year just by SW making up their own interpretations of 117 and the PBS buffers they use. But since it cost them about $6 to have me sit at the airport for 4 hours, they will schedule the trips that way. There is no reason we should be this many years into 117 and not be able to stack trips.



Would any of this change with a union? Maybe not. But it really is tiresome to hear our pilot group act like it would put the company under to pay me for the hours I am away from my family. There is so much waste with duplicate management and outdated equipment (we still do payroll with an f'ing excel sheet), but whatever we do, let's not make any changes. Just keep telling the pilots how expensive they are.

Having a union is so much more than just a contract. Especially in this career.
Old 04-16-2015 | 05:58 PM
  #9988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
I think you meant to say that it DOES deteriorate long term viability. And I'm saying that that isn't xjt pilots' fault. It was our CEO that decided to whipsaw us in 2008 which made xjt unprofitable. And it was our CEO who decided to actually buy xjt in 2010 after he had negotiated a money losing CPA that you correctly say is not sustainable. And it's our CEO who decided to keep us separate in order to suppress your wages and mine. So why should we pay for our CEO's mistakes and his willingness to pit his employees against each other? Was is it you don't get about that? I've even said that we were open to concessionary negotiations if it meant a complete merger. But our CEO's corporate culture gets in the way of that. That's all I'm saying. And like I already said, we are not trying to burn anything down. For example, we are negotiating PBS work rules to implement onto our contract BEFORE getting a joint contact with the CRJ side. We are willing to work with management in mutually agreeable way. It's actually our CEO that has done more damage to xjt than any employee group has. Lastly, I believe that the death nail was hammered into place when our MEC decided to roll over in 2010. I know they have no problems winding down xjt if things don't turn around and I'm ok with that. I'm not married to this company nor career. I just feel bad for the others who don't have a back up plan. It's said that corporate culture may end up harming thousands of families. And for what? Just to keep us from making a bit more or getting some better work rules. All in order to make some institutional shareholders some more money.





Having a union is so much more than just a contract. Especially in this career.
What does the Skywest pilots get with a merger? Nothing. Don't sprout the collective bargaining because no pilot group has leverage, all the alpa groups put together have no leverage as they fight each other. Union means unity and alpa at the regional level don't have that.
Old 04-16-2015 | 06:05 PM
  #9989  
elmetal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
What does the Skywest pilots get with a merger? Nothing. Don't sprout the collective bargaining because no pilot group has leverage, all the alpa groups put together have no leverage as they fight each other. Union means unity and alpa at the regional level don't have that.
Leverage against your own company is something a union would provide.
Old 04-16-2015 | 07:01 PM
  #9990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal
Leverage against your own company is something a union would provide.
How did that workout for comair and envoy?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices