Skywest
#9971
A few consultants on our team did stints at SkyWest. Really enjoyed all the people and it was a good place to be for a regional. I still enjoy stopping into some crew lounges when I can and catching up with old friends.
Hope all is well with SkyWest. We've enjoyed helping many of you prep for your upcoming interviews for greener pastures.
Cheers!
Centerline Interview Consulting
Hope all is well with SkyWest. We've enjoyed helping many of you prep for your upcoming interviews for greener pastures.
Cheers!
Centerline Interview Consulting
#9972
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
How ****ed would you be if you took the job with SW, then after you get out of training or have been here for a couple months, they offer a signing bonus for 10K?? If you think they would offer it retroactively, I'll give you examples of how they didn't offer it for the 7.5K type rating or our current pay package. It won't happen.
It may be all my interactions with CS that have me looking for someone stealing my wallet while shaking my hand, but I don't trust anything I hear from SGU anymore. The retention bonus is just a carrot. Does anyone think they would want to offer a retention bonus and SAPA would stop them? Why is it even in the pay package other than to plant the seed?? And why all of a sudden is TG willing to hear about CS abuse? They want to work together now?? Sorry, you have made your bed with years of abuse and not caring about me. So unless you are offering double time, I won't be willing to "help you out" If I need extra flying, I pick up crew posted trips and help a fellow pilot out.
P.S. Vote no
Last edited by disillusioned; 04-27-2015 at 02:11 PM. Reason: added P.S.
#9973
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Point taken. I am just saying for all those people that say if we don't get new hires, we won't be able to grow. I would say if you really want SkyWest, you will have to wait to see if those bonus come through. I really hope we push the company and either make them do it without our vote (and show us how they really feel about our "contract") or make them give something to the rest of the group.
How ****ed would you be if you took the job with SW, then after you get out of training or have been here for a couple months, they offer a signing bonus for 10K?? If you think they would offer it retroactively, I'll give you examples of how they didn't offer it for the 7.5K type rating or our current pay package. It won't happen.
It may be all my interactions with CS that have me looking for someone stealing my wallet while shaking my hand, but I don't trust anything I hear from SGU anymore. The retention bonus is just a carrot. Does anyone think they would want to offer a retention bonus and SAPA would stop them? Why is it even in the pay package other than to plant the seed?? And why all of a sudden is TG willing to hear about CS abuse? They want to work together now?? Sorry, you have made your bed with years of abuse and not caring about me. So unless you are offering double time, I won't be willing to "help you out" If I need extra flying, I pick up crew posted trips and help a fellow pilot out.
P.S. Vote no
How ****ed would you be if you took the job with SW, then after you get out of training or have been here for a couple months, they offer a signing bonus for 10K?? If you think they would offer it retroactively, I'll give you examples of how they didn't offer it for the 7.5K type rating or our current pay package. It won't happen.
It may be all my interactions with CS that have me looking for someone stealing my wallet while shaking my hand, but I don't trust anything I hear from SGU anymore. The retention bonus is just a carrot. Does anyone think they would want to offer a retention bonus and SAPA would stop them? Why is it even in the pay package other than to plant the seed?? And why all of a sudden is TG willing to hear about CS abuse? They want to work together now?? Sorry, you have made your bed with years of abuse and not caring about me. So unless you are offering double time, I won't be willing to "help you out" If I need extra flying, I pick up crew posted trips and help a fellow pilot out.
P.S. Vote no
#9974
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
If Skywest were to unionize I've no doubt the pilot contract negotiated would be an industry leading contract. We would be the best compensated regional in the industry and then be undercut by our regional brothers on every RFP that came out. So, while the bragging rights of having a great contract, which you currently have, would be a nice talking point, having flying awarded to the company you're working for is the ultimate goal. We are still getting flying awarded and ideally the best way to continue have that happen is by providing an excellent product at or slightly above the median price point. Currently, that is what Skywest Airlines does. Yes we have issues with our pilot contract. Yes the negotiating process is frustrating and slow. But for the most part the conditions here are good and at this point in time I think the THREAT of a union outweighs the benefits of a union. That WILL change just not sure when.
There is an illusion going on and its being perpetrated by management. I've worked at a non-union carrier. There is a difference between the two. Sometimes its just a matter of not know what you don't know. Anyway, being a unionized pilot group is so much more than just having a contract. And thats part of what people don't know.
Back your statement up with facts. How many regionals does Skywest undercut in cost?
How many regionals who are unionized are cheaper? Here some facts for you since you seem unable to come up with any:
Crew cost as percentage of hourly (non-fuel) operating cost that companies that have reported.
ERJ140/145
Republic - 23.2%
ExpressJet - 43.5%
Eage - 44.1%
CRJ200
PSA - 22.5%
Mesa - 26.1%
AirWis - 27.3%
Skywest - 28.7%
Pinnacle - 33.8%
ExpressJet - 35.1%
CRJ700
PSA - 22.2%
GoJet - 24.9%
Mesa - 27.5%
Skywest - 27.8%
ExpressJet - 36.9%
Eagle - 44.0%
E170
Republic - 24.2%
Compass - 42.2%
CRJ900
Mesa - 29.5%
Skywest - 33.2%
ExpressJet - 35.7%
Pinnacle - 38.6%
Again, you're equating guys crossing a picket line with Skywest pilots. That's an ignorant comparison.
Why do labor groups unionize?
How many regionals who are unionized are cheaper? Here some facts for you since you seem unable to come up with any:
Crew cost as percentage of hourly (non-fuel) operating cost that companies that have reported.
ERJ140/145
Republic - 23.2%
ExpressJet - 43.5%
Eage - 44.1%
CRJ200
PSA - 22.5%
Mesa - 26.1%
AirWis - 27.3%
Skywest - 28.7%
Pinnacle - 33.8%
ExpressJet - 35.1%
CRJ700
PSA - 22.2%
GoJet - 24.9%
Mesa - 27.5%
Skywest - 27.8%
ExpressJet - 36.9%
Eagle - 44.0%
E170
Republic - 24.2%
Compass - 42.2%
CRJ900
Mesa - 29.5%
Skywest - 33.2%
ExpressJet - 35.7%
Pinnacle - 38.6%
Again, you're equating guys crossing a picket line with Skywest pilots. That's an ignorant comparison.
Why do labor groups unionize?
Last edited by Nevets; 04-27-2015 at 03:49 PM.
#9975
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Point taken. I am just saying for all those people that say if we don't get new hires, we won't be able to grow. I would say if you really want SkyWest, you will have to wait to see if those bonus come through. I really hope we push the company and either make them do it without our vote (and show us how they really feel about our "contract") or make them give something to the rest of the group.
How ****ed would you be if you took the job with SW, then after you get out of training or have been here for a couple months, they offer a signing bonus for 10K?? If you think they would offer it retroactively, I'll give you examples of how they didn't offer it for the 7.5K type rating or our current pay package. It won't happen.
It may be all my interactions with CS that have me looking for someone stealing my wallet while shaking my hand, but I don't trust anything I hear from SGU anymore. The retention bonus is just a carrot. Does anyone think they would want to offer a retention bonus and SAPA would stop them? Why is it even in the pay package other than to plant the seed?? And why all of a sudden is TG willing to hear about CS abuse? They want to work together now?? Sorry, you have made your bed with years of abuse and not caring about me. So unless you are offering double time, I won't be willing to "help you out" If I need extra flying, I pick up crew posted trips and help a fellow pilot out.
P.S. Vote no
How ****ed would you be if you took the job with SW, then after you get out of training or have been here for a couple months, they offer a signing bonus for 10K?? If you think they would offer it retroactively, I'll give you examples of how they didn't offer it for the 7.5K type rating or our current pay package. It won't happen.
It may be all my interactions with CS that have me looking for someone stealing my wallet while shaking my hand, but I don't trust anything I hear from SGU anymore. The retention bonus is just a carrot. Does anyone think they would want to offer a retention bonus and SAPA would stop them? Why is it even in the pay package other than to plant the seed?? And why all of a sudden is TG willing to hear about CS abuse? They want to work together now?? Sorry, you have made your bed with years of abuse and not caring about me. So unless you are offering double time, I won't be willing to "help you out" If I need extra flying, I pick up crew posted trips and help a fellow pilot out.
P.S. Vote no
Anyway, didnt they say one of the other times you guys were voting on a a pay package that they will "looking" into CS abuse? And shouldn't you only be picking up from posted pairings anyway?
#9976
Finally, we agree on something. It never should've happened, but it has happened over and over again. What you are suggesting is the Skywest pilots put themselves in that situation. Why? How does that help the industry? The union does not fit at the regional level.
Thanks. I'm sure I'll do fine. Done.
#9977
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Retention bonus sounds like a paradox to me. If you want and vote for a retention bonus then it's apparent you want to stay here a long time. If that is the case, then why should the company reward you for something you were already going to do?
Also, the math equates to $70M annually if they actually went through with it. And, IMO, I don't see the company spending that kind of cash.
Also, the math equates to $70M annually if they actually went through with it. And, IMO, I don't see the company spending that kind of cash.
#9978
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
They could cut the lifers pay and many will still be lifers.
#9979
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
[/COLOR][/B]
Finally, we agree on something. It never should've happened, but it has happened over and over again. What you are suggesting is the Skywest pilots put themselves in that situation. Why? How does that help the industry? The union does not fit at the regional level.
Thanks. I'm sure I'll do fine. Done.
Finally, we agree on something. It never should've happened, but it has happened over and over again. What you are suggesting is the Skywest pilots put themselves in that situation. Why? How does that help the industry? The union does not fit at the regional level.
Thanks. I'm sure I'll do fine. Done.
Retention bonus sounds like a paradox to me. If you want and vote for a retention bonus then it's apparent you want to stay here a long time. If that is the case, then why should the company reward you for something you were already going to do?
Also, the math equates to $70M annually if they actually went through with it. And, IMO, I don't see the company spending that kind of cash.
Also, the math equates to $70M annually if they actually went through with it. And, IMO, I don't see the company spending that kind of cash.
So you are saying that management is not being honest with the pilots? Are they just using unethical tactics in order to try to persuade the pilots to vote yes? Would they negotiate a pay raise and then park a fleet? Are they offering a profit sharing plan knowing there won't be any profits?
#9980
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
So you are saying that management is not being honest with the pilots? Are they just using unethical tactics in order to try to persuade the pilots to vote yes? Would they negotiate a pay raise and then park a fleet? Are they offering a profit sharing plan knowing there won't be any profits?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post