Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   Skywest v2.0 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/93589-skywest-v2-0-a.html)

Jvw700 02-17-2017 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 2303789)
SKW wash outs are not caused by poor training, but rather relaxed entry standards. This is a double-edged sword for applicants.

One one hand, an applicant who might not have gotten a chance in the past at least gets to try. A lot of it is up to them.

But some folks are just not going to make it, and now they have a training failure on their record. But they can always go try again at another regional.

The extra IOE in a lot of cases is to make up for older pilots who are rusty on instruments. Nothing wrong with that if the company wishes to spend the money, plenty of them are just fine pilots once they get up to speed. As long as they make the hard call at the end if needed.

Yup! And then there's secondary ioe with the line captains...... The new paradigm of weeding people out through training just seems awfully expensive. You're right though, it definitely gives people a shot!

Squallrider 02-17-2017 03:12 PM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2303767)
Hey we are firing up tele-hiring, time to eat crow on those mesa Skype jokes.

Skype interviewing people that can't get to Denver or slc etc such as military based over seas isn't the same thing

elmetal 02-17-2017 03:17 PM


Originally Posted by Jvw700 (Post 2303812)
Yup! And then there's secondary ioe with the line captains...... The new paradigm of weeding people out through training just seems awfully expensive. You're right though, it definitely gives people a shot!

Theyre covering the flights and still denying people 200% junior man. They don't care how much it costs they care that they still have the power to tell you NO

Aurora8 02-17-2017 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by Flip69 (Post 2303688)
Hate to break the news, but SkyWest is pretty much doing the same thing. And don't try say they aren't. They are. Compared to 10 years ago, it's night and day. The training washes out the weak.

I had Skype interviews last December with Mesa, Republic, and Skywest.

Mesa was the most relaxed but the comments that they don't have an interview are BS. Yes, it wasn't very tough, but it seemed to me they were more interested in what sort of person I am and probably figured with an ATP, several types, and jet time, I know how to fly an airplane. My experience with their recruiters and the Capts who interviewed me was very positive; I didn't accept the offer that came a couple of days later because of the low pay.

The Republic interview was a washout becuase the Skype connection was terrible, but they weren't willing to 'hang up' and start again or reschedule: it really was a joke - couldn't hear their questions, etc. The interview itself wasn't any more thorough than Mesa and it was with an HR person and an FO unlike Mesa which (as above) was two Capts, which I thought was more appropriate. I got a TBNT's and wasn't surprised: they probably thought I was deaf as I kept saying, "Say again?"

My Skywest interview was definitely the most intense and longest - about 4 hours with a CRJ check Capt. We had some IT trouble to start, but unlike Republic, the SKW CA was willing to take the time to sort it out. The gouge was pretty much spot on (I still had to draw the diagrams and hold them up to the camera) but, of course, there was a lot of conversation outside of the questions asked that the gouge doesn't cover. I got the CJO the next day. Obviously, a face-to-face interview is better (I'd have preferred that as well), but still, given how thorough the interview was, I don't think it's fair to say - at least in my experience - SKW is hiring anybody who can fog a mirror.

EFBprobs 02-18-2017 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by Aurora8 (Post 2303832)
I had Skype interviews last December with Mesa, Republic, and Skywest.

Mesa was the most relaxed but the comments that they don't have an interview are BS. Yes, it wasn't very tough, but it seemed to me they were more interested in what sort of person I am and probably figured with an ATP, several types, and jet time, I know how to fly an airplane. My experience with their recruiters and the Capts who interviewed me was very positive; I didn't accept the offer that came a couple of days later because of the low pay.

The Republic interview was a washout becuase the Skype connection was terrible, but they weren't willing to 'hang up' and start again or reschedule: it really was a joke - couldn't hear their questions, etc. The interview itself wasn't any more thorough than Mesa and it was with an HR person and an FO unlike Mesa which (as above) was two Capts, which I thought was more appropriate. I got a TBNT's and wasn't surprised: they probably thought I was deaf as I kept saying, "Say again?"

My Skywest interview was definitely the most intense and longest - about 4 hours with a CRJ check Capt. We had some IT trouble to start, but unlike Republic, the SKW CA was willing to take the time to sort it out. The gouge was pretty much spot on (I still had to draw the diagrams and hold them up to the camera) but, of course, there was a lot of conversation outside of the questions asked that the gouge doesn't cover. I got the CJO the next day. Obviously, a face-to-face interview is better (I'd have preferred that as well), but still, given how thorough the interview was, I don't think it's fair to say - at least in my experience - SKW is hiring anybody who can fog a mirror.

did they say why they didn't fly you to denver for the interview?

Randol 02-19-2017 08:30 AM

I heard Skywest hires folks for part time flying...does anyone have info on that? Do any other regionals do this too? Thanks

Turbosina 02-19-2017 08:38 AM


Originally Posted by Randol (Post 2304795)
I heard Skywest hires folks for part time flying...does anyone have info on that? Do any other regionals do this too? Thanks

There was a draft proposal from SAPA to hire pilots, reserve only, to fly less than the minimum required monthly credit of 58:36. It's just a proposal and will likely not go beyond the draft stage.

Is offline 02-19-2017 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by Turbosina (Post 2304800)
There was a draft proposal from SAPA to hire pilots, reserve only, to fly less than the minimum required monthly credit of 58:36. It's just a proposal and will likely not go beyond the draft stage.

They were working on one that would allow them to pick up crew posted flying but the company just wanted permanent reserves.

ImPilot I Fly 02-19-2017 12:08 PM

90 hours. 11 days off! Yay...

Flyguy4723 02-19-2017 12:22 PM

Whats the wait time looking like for reserve as well as upgrade time?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands