Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   Skywest v2.0 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/93589-skywest-v2-0-a.html)

amcnd 03-14-2017 07:52 AM

I agree. Anyone in a UA base complaining about 700's pairing knew this was coming...

Ace66 03-14-2017 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2320331)
I agree. Anyone in a UA base complaining about 700's pairing knew this was coming...

Is this a trend for other bases such as DEN or just SFO? I need to make a final decision on equipment soon. Everyone says to go to the CRJ for hours, but I'd eventually like to get to DEN.

tcco94 03-14-2017 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by Ace66 (Post 2320367)
Is this a trend for other bases such as DEN or just SFO? I need to make a final decision on equipment soon. Everyone says to go to the CRJ for hours, but I'd eventually like to get to DEN.

If you want DEN you need to go 175

amcnd 03-14-2017 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 2320441)
If you want DEN you need to go 175

Or DEN Aspen.

Flymeaway 03-14-2017 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 2320441)
If you want DEN you need to go 175

Is COS still a reasonable goal in the CRJ? What's DEN looking like as far as time to get there and reserve time in the ERJ?

Thanks.

WesternSkies 03-14-2017 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by Ace66 (Post 2320367)
Is this a trend for other bases such as DEN or just SFO? I need to make a final decision on equipment soon. Everyone says to go to the CRJ for hours, but I'd eventually like to get to DEN.

Yeah
Id say most of our base size and trip quality on the CRJ side has been due to the United 700 change up. All united hub/outstation domiciles have been affected negatively. Iah is the most obvious. While Ord crews are being almost unaffected due to American 700 flying blowing up there.
Den used to be busier. Cos has even less diversity in flying schedules than it did before.

There have been other minor changes but the 700 change put all of this in motion.
I'm curious at which number of 7/9airframes they have planned to stop triple qualifying everyone. We may be far far from that number but still curious what their playbook says.

Student01 03-14-2017 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 2320441)
If you want DEN you need to go 175

If you go DEN 175 you only fly for UAX right?
How many 175 departures are there from DEN with United?

No Lies 03-14-2017 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by hotbreeze (Post 2320099)
United re-upped Xjet's E145s through the end of 2018 out of IAH. It is American that is cutting Xjet's E145s.

United re-upped only a few of their current 145 fleet for XJT. UA can't move all of their 145's (UA ownes the XJT planes) to another carrier overnight and they only re-upped what they knew could not be moved to one of their partly owned carriers in the next year.

tcco94 03-14-2017 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by Student01 (Post 2320488)
If you go DEN 175 you only fly for UAX right?
How many 175 departures are there from DEN with United?

I wouldn't worry about departures but just based on what I can see on the CRJ side in Colorado. DEN and COS are extremely stagnant because of us losing the UAL CRJ's and expansion of the ERJ. Same thing going on in SFO.

Someone here probably has the number of departures though.

Student01 03-14-2017 02:13 PM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 2320520)
I wouldn't worry about departures but just based on what I can see on the CRJ side in Colorado. DEN and COS are extremely stagnant because of us losing the UAL CRJ's and expansion of the ERJ. Same thing going on in SFO.

Someone here probably has the number of departures though.

Oh so overall less CRJ work and more E-Jets for UAX.
Is SFO also only United like DEN is?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands