Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe? >

737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe?

Search

Notices

737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2019 | 04:37 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot
GGG's?

filler
Hahahahaha...oh no you didn't!
Reply
Old 04-12-2019 | 05:38 AM
  #192  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

Media reporting SWA will keep the Max off the schedule until August 5.
Will the fix require training?
Reply
Old 04-12-2019 | 05:58 AM
  #193  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 281
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by qball
Media reporting SWA will keep the Max off the schedule until August 5.
Will the fix require training?
Probably......in the form of a distance learning video 🙄
Reply
Old 04-12-2019 | 07:08 AM
  #194  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 109
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Probably......in the form of a distance learning video

Well, to be fair what is the alternative? A simulator doesn’t exist and even if it did, how long would it take to run 10,000 pilots through a classroom and simulator training event.

That’s precisely what distance learning was built for - to quickly disseminate information to a wide audience. Provided the software fix solves the immediate problem and no heroic airmanship should be required in the immediate future I’m just fine with distance learning now, followed by simulator training via the normal recurrent cycle when the simulators are available.

Full disclosure, my wife is an instructional designer who creates distance learning for another company.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 04-13-2019 | 06:59 AM
  #195  
Sluggo_63's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
Well, to be fair what is the alternative?
I guess it really depends on what level differences the FAA is going to classify the new changes as. The MAX was classified as Level “B”. I think now, the FAA is going to be looked at as crazy and incompetent, if when the new changes come out, they again say “30 minutes on the iPad is okay.” I’m guessing the new MAX changes are going to be classified as Level “C” (at least), but probably “D,” which requires an FTD.

Originally Posted by “FAA 8900.1”
B. Level B Differences. Level B differences are those differences in systems, controls, and indicators that have only minor procedural differences. Level B differences are of great enough degree to require formal training in general operational subjects, aircraft systems, or both, but are not of great enough degree to require systems integration training. An example of a Level B difference is a fuel system with additional fuel tanks, pumps, and gauges. Procedural differences are limited to the operation of transfer valves and pumps while an aircraft is in cruise flight. Appropriate instructional methods for Level B differences include, but are not limited to, audiovisual presentations, lectures, and tutorial computer-based instruction (TCBI). A task or systems check for Level B differences must be conducted after training. Appropriate methods include an oral or written exam or TCBI self-test.

C. Level C Differences. Level C differences are part task differences of flightcrew member knowledge, skills, and/or abilities. Level C differences are those differences of great enough degree to require a systems integration training module but that are not of great enough degree to require actual flight training (see Volume 3, Chapter 19, Section 5 for a definition and description of systems integration training). An example of a Level C difference is the installation of a flight management system (FMS) computer. Appropriate training methods in the systems integration module are dedicated part task trainers, interactive computer-based instruction (ICBI), or Level 4 or higher flight simulation training devices (FSTD). Level C differences require a check following training. Appropriate devices are the same as for Level C training. Checking methods appropriate to Level C differences are demonstrations of skill in the procedures affected by the difference. In the case of the installation of an FMS computer, checking might consist of preflight programming of the computer and a demonstration of its use in navigation, climbs, and descents.

D. Level D Differences. Level D differences are full task differences of flightcrew member knowledge, skills, and/or abilities. Level D differences are those differences for which there is a requirement for flight training modules in a Level 6 or higher FSTD. When Level D differences exist between two aircraft, general operational subject modules, aircraft systems modules, and systems integration modules may be required. An example of a Level D difference is the installation of an electronically integrated flight instrumentation display. Aircraft operations using such a display are required to contain flight training in most phases of flight. Level 6 or higher FSTDs are appropriate for conducting Level D differences training and qualification modules. Level D differences require a check following training. The check must be conducted using scenarios representing a real‑time flight environment.

E. Level E Differences. Level E differences are such significant full task differences that a “high‑fidelity” environment is required to attain or maintain knowledge, skills, or abilities. Level E differences are those differences for which there is a requirement for flight training, including landing events. An example of a Level E difference is the installation of a Short Takeoff and Landing (STOL) kit on an aircraft, resulting in a very different flare and landing attitude. A Level C or D full flight simulator (FFS) or an aircraft is required for flight training in Level E differences. Checking for Level E differences requires a full part 121 proficiency check or part 135 competency check in a Level C or D FFS or an aircraft.
FAA 8900.1
Reply
Old 04-14-2019 | 11:40 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Default

Does anyone remember this incident. No deaths thankfully but also an AOA issue.

https://youtu.be/VerCAfjLrAg
Reply
Old 04-16-2019 | 11:39 AM
  #197  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Boeing contract software developers bring you.....PBS!

Now that’s a scary thought, and true in a roundabout way.
Reply
Old 04-16-2019 | 11:52 AM
  #198  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Ran into a Fed today who’s working directly on getting the MAX back into the air. Straight from his mouth:

- AA, SWA, & UAL have had a chance to fly the MAX sim in MIA with the new software installed. All three airlines are content with it.

.
Oh yeah. The sim (a big computer game), works the way the stakeholders want it to, just like before. I’m comfortable with that :rolleyes

Remember the MD80 max flap takeoff procedure developed after the LGA accident? 23 flaps for all takeoffs when the runway is contaminated. Except a heavy 2 engine jet with max flaps on one engine is a pig, at best.

Being dubious about the prospect of surviving a V1 cut at heavy weight with 23 flaps at sea level, I tried 4 in the sim. Crashed every time. When this was reported to flight ops, they panicked. “Oh the sim is just programmed wrong”. We fixed it now...it works.

“Uh, did you get the Steve Canyon crews to do flight testing on that”? Naw, it’s all extrapolated data.

“Oh, does that mean all the PC’s for the last year are invalid”?

More panic... then uh,...no, because we didn’t do any flap23 engine outs.....

Quietly, reversed policy a few months later and put the corner of the rug back.
Reply
Old 04-16-2019 | 12:04 PM
  #199  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Originally Posted by Meow1215
Where are the mods?
The bad post would have come to our attention earlier if someone had used the “report post” icon. Otherwise we may not see it for a day or two.
Reply
Old 04-17-2019 | 08:54 AM
  #200  
Meow1215's Avatar
On Guard!
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
The bad post would have come to our attention earlier if someone had used the “report post” icon. Otherwise we may not see it for a day or two.
That is not a feature that is available on the mobile version it appears.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STXDrew
United
48
09-10-2018 06:18 PM
Shortbase
Southwest
5
08-08-2018 05:31 AM
Martin404
United
476
04-07-2018 03:24 PM
flyingtigermco
Safety
8
02-13-2011 08:23 AM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices