Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Kelly
dude. He was just asking for your relative seniority because he was making the point that your seniority determines how you feel about the situation. No need to be a giant tool about it.
Dude, I already told him what I was willing to tell him about my seniority in a previous post. Yet he continues to push. Boundaries.
A reductio ad absurdum is reducing an argument to absurdity. He’s making the argument that the validity of what I’m saying hinges on where I’m at on the seniority list. I could be Dean, the bottom guy on our list, and not be worried at all about furlough if I have some other factor going on that gives me peace of mind. I could also be the most senior dude on the list and be terrified of furlough for some reason or another.
The point is where a person falls on the list is only one factor that feeds into how they might feel about a furlough. How far do we take the revealing of personal information to determine if someone’s opinion is worthy? How absurd do we get with how much we must know about a person before we determine they are credible?
A reductio as absurdum is a rhetorical device. If you believe that’s being “a tool”, then that’s your deal. You do you.
Evaluate the argument on its merits. Or don’t. It’s up to you.