Deadheading & Assigned Seating
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,530
Likes: 370
THIS is exactly what we need. Our rules were written in a time before assigned seating was even a thought and the results are predictable. As for the present, I don't blame SWAPA for the company being obstinate. I do blame them for allowing very loose language to make it into a TA. That's over and done, though. What I am concerned about now is the end result. Pilots should be put in premium seats if they are available, should be first in line for upgrade, and should never be forced to be in a middle. Those are easy changes to make and will prevent fatigue calls and down line disruptions. I cannot imagine doing a transcon in a middle and then flying a leg. Absolutely not. There used to be language about deadheading on a flight over 2 hours in the jumpseat back when they could force us to ride in it. It's the same issue....it's impossible to get any sort of "downtime" in the middle with Mr Manspread on one side and Mrs. Hamhock on the other. I will 100 percent call fatigued, but many would not, and that concerns me.
#23
Sounds very nice. Kind of a pipe dream for SWA pilots. We have the scheduling chair of SWAPA interviewing for a company VP position. Make things worse the union is onboard with it, sending out an email saying what a great job he is doing . The clowns at WN will get a middle seat and just be happy they do not have to sit in the lav.
#24
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 22
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Here’s how it plays out. If your seat isn’t compliant with our contract, you approach the gate agent, explain the situation and then they “should” fix the glitch. If they don’t you say thank you, take a seat and call our FODM (flight ops duty mgr/UA pilot).
Generally (99%) the phone will ring at the gate, they gate agent gives you evil looks, then calls you up to the gate to give you your contractually compliant seat. If the FODM can’t fix the glitch, then you can refuse the DH.
Also there has to be an available FC seat at the time of booking or you will be booked in premium plus and will be the first person on the upgrade list.
#25
THIS is exactly what we need. Our rules were written in a time before assigned seating was even a thought and the results are predictable. As for the present, I don't blame SWAPA for the company being obstinate. I do blame them for allowing very loose language to make it into a TA. That's over and done, though. What I am concerned about now is the end result. Pilots should be put in premium seats if they are available, should be first in line for upgrade, and should never be forced to be in a middle. Those are easy changes to make and will prevent fatigue calls and down line disruptions. I cannot imagine doing a transcon in a middle and then flying a leg. Absolutely not. There used to be language about deadheading on a flight over 2 hours in the jumpseat back when they could force us to ride in it. It's the same issue....it's impossible to get any sort of "downtime" in the middle with Mr Manspread on one side and Mrs. Hamhock on the other. I will 100 percent call fatigued, but many would not, and that concerns me.
Never Mind i fogot they can do zoom meetings now so it probably won't get a second look.
#26
Here’s how it plays out. If your seat isn’t compliant with our contract, you approach the gate agent, explain the situation and then they “should” fix the glitch. If they don’t you say thank you, take a seat and call our FODM (flight ops duty mgr/UA pilot).
Generally (99%) the phone will ring at the gate, they gate agent gives you evil looks, then calls you up to the gate to give you your contractually compliant seat. If the FODM can’t fix the glitch, then you can refuse the DH.
Also there has to be an available FC seat at the time of booking or you will be booked in premium plus and will be the first person on the upgrade list.
Generally (99%) the phone will ring at the gate, they gate agent gives you evil looks, then calls you up to the gate to give you your contractually compliant seat. If the FODM can’t fix the glitch, then you can refuse the DH.
Also there has to be an available FC seat at the time of booking or you will be booked in premium plus and will be the first person on the upgrade list.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,561
Likes: 278
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
I love that UAL has that provision.
#28
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 622
Likes: 108
From: 737CA
If the company decides to stone wall this, they will pay come summer time. This goes beyond flight ops. Commercial side of the house is probably the ones making noise about this. Their is nothing SWAPA can do about it contractually but their are other provisions to make sure your fit to fly.
I’ll be honest, last bargaining cycle, when SEP came out, my top 5/6 were scope, retirement, disability, training Scheduling, commutability on some 4 days and cashing out all of sick or a portion of it. Never thought displacements, DH’s, APL, density of trips and trip construction(1/3, 2/2, etc)would be an issue. As the company changes the network with more connections and creating more banks, day of the week flying, it creates problems. This current CBA was not designed to tackle all these changes. CBA is over 350 pages. Guess we’ll need to add more.
#29
On the other hand, we get 50 pct add pay for any DH that is flown in a middle economy seat. When trips get broken up and a DH gets added at the last minute, a lot of guys I've flown with will drool over the add pay and be disappointed when a compliant seat suddenly opens up.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 78
On the other hand, we get 50 pct add pay for any DH that is flown in a middle economy seat. When trips get broken up and a DH gets added at the last minute, a lot of guys I've flown with will drool over the add pay and be disappointed when a compliant seat suddenly opens up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



