We got an AIP!
01-31-2018 | 12:03 PM
#971
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
SWA replaced their MEC or parts after their failed TA, didn't they? Or was it their NC? I don't remember.
Our MEC vote for the TA was unanimous, recommended by the NC. Why would you want to continue with them if they don't know what the group wants?
I'm not recommending it, but the potential is there.
Please don't take it as selling fear, we just have to weigh all the risks.
01-31-2018 | 12:05 PM
#972
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
We used to have a lot of LAS pairings that were 3 days worth 13:30. Redeye to the east coast, 22:30 layover, one leg back the next AM. Those went away because they figured out they could turn them into 18 hour 4 days with 17:50 block. More efficient for them. Now they will be worth 10 hours. (2 duty periods, just under 10 block) I'm sure they will show up again and you will see a lot of 22-23 hour layovers where you go to the hotel at 7 am and have to try to grab 2 nights sleep in 23 hours.
Why in the world they caved on that I will never know. That in itself will be a huge QOL hit, not only because of the bad sleep schedule, but because it'll take you 6 calendar days to net 20 hours of pay. I hope you have a crash pad. You will see it a lot.
Why in the world they caved on that I will never know. That in itself will be a huge QOL hit, not only because of the bad sleep schedule, but because it'll take you 6 calendar days to net 20 hours of pay. I hope you have a crash pad. You will see it a lot.
01-31-2018 | 12:09 PM
#973
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
You don’t have to replace them, but I heard they are stepping down if this gets voted down (of course rumors ) , but be prepared for it to take another year to get a new deal.
01-31-2018 | 01:21 PM
#974
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
We got an AIP!
Many think they got as far as they could so why continue with them, some think they'll just quit.
SWA replaced their MEC or parts after their failed TA, didn't they? Or was it their NC? I don't remember.
Our MEC vote for the TA was unanimous, recommended by the NC. Why would you want to continue with them if they don't know what the group wants?
I'm not recommending it, but the potential is there.
Please don't take it as selling fear, we just have to weigh all the risks.
SWA replaced their MEC or parts after their failed TA, didn't they? Or was it their NC? I don't remember.
Our MEC vote for the TA was unanimous, recommended by the NC. Why would you want to continue with them if they don't know what the group wants?
I'm not recommending it, but the potential is there.
Please don't take it as selling fear, we just have to weigh all the risks.
We replaced the union leadership and the NC in entirety and had a new TA far superior to TA1 9 months later or so.
01-31-2018 | 01:35 PM
#975
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
01-31-2018 | 02:07 PM
#976
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
01-31-2018 | 04:06 PM
#977
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
01-31-2018 | 05:57 PM
#978
Turd Ferguson
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: The low pay seat
Many think they got as far as they could so why continue with them, some think they'll just quit.
SWA replaced their MEC or parts after their failed TA, didn't they? Or was it their NC? I don't remember.
Our MEC vote for the TA was unanimous, recommended by the NC. Why would you want to continue with them if they don't know what the group wants?
I'm not recommending it, but the potential is there.
Please don't take it as selling fear, we just have to weigh all the risks.
SWA replaced their MEC or parts after their failed TA, didn't they? Or was it their NC? I don't remember.
Our MEC vote for the TA was unanimous, recommended by the NC. Why would you want to continue with them if they don't know what the group wants?
I'm not recommending it, but the potential is there.
Please don't take it as selling fear, we just have to weigh all the risks.
01-31-2018 | 06:26 PM
#979
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
01-31-2018 | 06:58 PM
#980
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Scope was a huge change. TA1 had massive scope concessions in terms of codesharing. It also didn’t have a DC retirement. I think scope alone was the main reason for the original no. I’ll let the southwest pilot speak to actual hourly (trip for pay) increase
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
