Search

Notices

We got an AIP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2018 | 07:03 PM
  #981  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by putzin
Ah, sorry.

Out of curiosity, how much was the increase from old contract to new, TA1 to TA?

Thanks
Here's the thread that discussed it:

How does this TA compare with rejected TA?
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 09:06 AM
  #982  
astral's Avatar
captain scarlet
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Who needs to know?
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
We replaced the union leadership and the NC in entirety and had a new TA far superior to TA1 9 months later or so.
Originally Posted by Big E 757
It’s pretty common for management to have ALPA sign a letter agreeing to support the TA...
It’s a substantial improvement, but is it enough...
At Delta, our MEC Chairman resigned after the failure of TA1...
we still had a much better TA in 6 months.
Thank you for providing that evidence.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 10:47 AM
  #983  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by astral
Thank you for providing that evidence.
Man I am not arguing which way to vote on this TA. Those two examples are not comparable, it was SWA and Delta management they are dealing with. We are dealing with Spirt Management, and I could see them delaying another TA for a long time just because of their egos. So if you vote No realize that you could be living with this current contract for a year or two. If you vote yes realize that you could be living with the new contract for 6 to 8 years. Read the TA and then decide is my only point.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 03:31 PM
  #984  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Dukeuno
Man I am not arguing which way to vote on this TA. Those two examples are not comparable, it was SWA and Delta management they are dealing with. We are dealing with Spirt Management, and I could see them delaying another TA for a long time just because of their egos. So if you vote No realize that you could be living with this current contract for a year or two. If you vote yes realize that you could be living with the new contract for 6 to 8 years. Read the TA and then decide is my only point.
Astral has referenced SWA and Delta only. Those are not even remotely comparable to our situation and those guys risked little to get what they wanted. Even if it wasn't "little", it would cost us substantially more if we got stuck under this contract.

What he WON'T reference are his previous carriers where he turned down a substantial gain in pay, (possibly) IS scope and LTD and and received or aquire additional gains.

He thinks risking this one is tantamount to risking what was probably a 10-15% gain with really nothing else. He has stated he is willing to "wager" it all and bets we'll have some sort of a coup by waiting an additional 6-12 months.

Honestly he reminds me of the guy who sold it all, went to Vegas and bet it all on black. Of course that guy won and apparently, I can only guess, we should approach this TA with same kind reckless abandon??

As stated before I'm all for holding out, but it will longer than 3 months without a doubt. The rumors of the NC or MEC stepping have to come from somewhere and that alone would probably take 6 months not to mention training a new negotiating team.

Done with this one too.

🍻
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 03:38 PM
  #985  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default

Gee, I wonder if the veiled and not so veiled threats of resignations are part of the sales pitch? It seems to me that would be unnecessary as under the current conditions the union probably has the best deal they possibly could. A no vote changes those conditions and will undoubtedly cause the company to come up. The question is how much and in how long. Before anyone says they could hold out indefinitely consider if that is the case why do we even have the offer we have now.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 06:26 PM
  #986  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by putzin
Astral has referenced SWA and Delta only. Those are not even remotely comparable to our situation and those guys risked little to get what they wanted. Even if it wasn't "little", it would cost us substantially more if we got stuck under this contract.

What he WON'T reference are his previous carriers where he turned down a substantial gain in pay, (possibly) IS scope and LTD and and received or aquire additional gains.

He thinks risking this one is tantamount to risking what was probably a 10-15% gain with really nothing else. He has stated he is willing to "wager" it all and bets we'll have some sort of a coup by waiting an additional 6-12 months.

Honestly he reminds me of the guy who sold it all, went to Vegas and bet it all on black. Of course that guy won and apparently, I can only guess, we should approach this TA with same kind reckless abandon??
🍻
I’ve been waiting for his response as well. He’s proclaimed it has happened twice in his career, but has provided no numbers or airlines he was employed where said actions happened. I’m glad I’m not the only one waiting on his FACTS.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 06:31 PM
  #987  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by beech_nut
Gee, I wonder if the veiled and not so veiled threats of resignations are part of the sales pitch? It seems to me that would be unnecessary as under the current conditions the union probably has the best deal they possibly could. A no vote changes those conditions and will undoubtedly cause the company to come up. The question is how much and in how long. Before anyone says they could hold out indefinitely consider if that is the case why do we even have the offer we have now.
A honest question, your presumption is the union won’t resign. What if they do? Which is a worst case scenario and which scenario would you rather plan on? I always plan on worst case scenario, gives me more options.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 08:12 PM
  #988  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default

I think it is possible they will. Possible because they feel like we have voted no confidence in them which I think if the contract is voted down would be a false assumption for the reasons I stated above. Another possibility is they would resign in anger over the no vote which would also be sad and I would hope would not happen. Either way I don't think that should factor in to a decision to vote for or against the TA. I can't base the a vote on the contract I will have to live under for the next 8 years on hurting or not hurting someones feelings or worrying it will take a few months to gear back up. I have to base my vote on whats best for me and if I think we are being short changed and can do better. I'm pretty sure the company refused to go higher than they though it would take to get a 51% yes vote. I don't know if that will be good enough for me and I'm pretty sure they will come up if they see it will actually take more to get to 51%. They must have some reason for wanting this done because it is clear the cheapest option for them is continued stonewalling.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 08:24 PM
  #989  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Either way, they stay GREAT! What if they don’t? I can only assume the worst. I see no coherent plan B. Again, who would step up, man up? I have heard NOTHING.... (Again, not fully decided, need to see language, blah de blah de blah de blah.... Same **** everyone else says either side of the fence, blah de blah de blah de blah....)

Last edited by Tranquility; 02-01-2018 at 08:52 PM.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 02:39 AM
  #990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by beech_nut
Gee, I wonder if the veiled and not so veiled threats of resignations are part of the sales pitch? It seems to me that would be unnecessary as under the current conditions the union probably has the best deal they possibly could. A no vote changes those conditions and will undoubtedly cause the company to come up. The question is how much and in how long. Before anyone says they could hold out indefinitely consider if that is the case why do we even have the offer we have now.
Veiled threat sales pitch? Resign out of anger? Do you even know the three guys on the NC? Just because you read it on the internet doesn’t make it legitimate. Here’s an idea: why don’t you wait til next week and ASK them?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NavyFlyer
Delta
195
09-03-2016 11:31 AM
Free Flyer
Major
13
12-06-2015 07:37 PM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices