Negligent accounting

Reply Subscribe

Page 15 of 19

« First

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

02-11-2018 | 06:47 PM

#141

lowandslow

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 307

Likes: 0

From: A320HD

Quote:

Originally Posted by dotslash

Thank you Mr Queen of the Scope Age

Hahaha!

He can Go(jet) with the flow.

Thank you I’ll be here all week.

02-11-2018 | 06:53 PM

#142

balakay

Line Holder

Joined: Oct 2016

Posts: 75

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gjn290

It is apparent you cannot be reasoned with.

You came on APC to reason with someone?

02-11-2018 | 07:43 PM

#143

Lincoln Osiris

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2017

Posts: 1,169

Likes: 164

From: NK CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot

Profit sharing????

I think Qotsa is on to something. Lets delay a contract by another 2 years so we can make sure to get profit sharing a lose more money in the process!

02-11-2018 | 08:32 PM

#144

SourGrapes

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 532

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris

I think Qotsa is on to something. Lets delay a contract by another 2 years so we can make sure to get profit sharing a lose more money in the process!

2 years? no way Jose!!!! one side is very motivated......for many reasons

you didn't listen to your own advice Lincoln

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pN5XiTUqwM

02-11-2018 | 08:36 PM

#145

Lincoln Osiris

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2017

Posts: 1,169

Likes: 164

From: NK CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by SourGrapes

2 years? no way Jose!!!! one side is very motivated......for many reasons

you didn't listen to your own advice Lincoln

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pN5XiTUqwM

lmao grapes wins. but yea one side is very motivated, ours. The other two sides (company and NMB) could give two craps and if this gets voted down we will get put on the back burner for a longgggg time. That's not just hysteria that is a fact.

02-11-2018 | 10:19 PM

#146

astral

captain scarlet

Joined: May 2015

Posts: 170

Likes: 0

From: Who needs to know?

Quote:

That's not just hysteria that is a fact.

NO that's worse than hysteria, it's lack of commitment, self worth, and B@lls.

02-11-2018 | 10:34 PM

#147

Lincoln Osiris

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2017

Posts: 1,169

Likes: 164

From: NK CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by astral

NO that's worse than hysteria, it's lack of commitment, self worth, and B@lls.

You obviously have not been following negotiations very closely and have not even take the time to watch both the ALPA videos up on the TA website. But I can only take a guy so seriously that say "management is motivated to have this done more than we are" hahahaha.

02-12-2018 | 09:10 AM

#148

Ed Force One

Line Holder

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 778

Likes: 16

From: A320 CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gjn290

I am in no way condoning a codeshare with NAI. I am 100% totally opposed to that.

I'll see your "in no way condoning" and raise you a "in no way voting for language that allows."

Your personal lack of condoning will lose to contractual language that condones. Every time.

02-12-2018 | 09:19 AM

#149

SourGrapes

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 532

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris

I think Qotsa is on to something. Lets delay a contract by another 2 years so we can make sure to get profit sharing a lose more money in the process!

so, don't get profit sharing because 'nobody got time for that'?

02-12-2018 | 09:33 AM

#150

Beans

Banned

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 163

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by CMFIC

290- although we don't agree, I appreciate a coherent comment.

If you really believe pilots are naive for thinking this is a cost neutral offer, you may want to review recent comments made by the CFO (soon to be CEO) of Spirit Airlines. Keep in mind, the CFO has the ultimate situational awareness of a company's finances.

"Should the tentative agreement with our pilots be ratified, we will gain tools that will allow us to further improve our operational reliability and drive efficiencies, which gives us confidence that we will be able to maintain or grow our relative cost advantage,"

Pursuant to Securities Act of 1933 (SEC rules), section 4A, it would be illegal for an executive to make such misleading statements to the investment community.

Can we agree this is offer is trading QOL for an industry lagging pay rate?

And how some don't see this as cost neutral befuddles me. When the dang CFO tells investors its neutral and still a group is all in "yes" like this is a fair and "industry standard". Its far from standard on every section period. YGTBSM