Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Negligent accounting >

Negligent accounting

Search

Notices

Negligent accounting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2018 | 10:18 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CMFIC
Are we supposed to believe flushing virtually our entire set of work rules down the toilet amounts to a paltry 12.8M annual savings for the airline??
Easy - we are not “flushing our entire set of work rules down the toilet.”

What planet are you on?
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 10:22 AM
  #12  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by CMFIC
A 99% NO Vote would be a good start.

The airline NEEDS this deal. The airline needs to grow. Right now- if they operate 200 aircraft- they need close to 4,000 pilots. They can't afford the inefficiencies of our current CBA! Do we think it's a coincidence that, after 3 years of talks, they get us back to the table just in time to fly a summer schedule? Just in time to place another order?

This isn't reading between the lines- listen to their earnings calls- even Bob's Emails have been transparent. I don't know if their motivation can be any more apparent.
Ok now explain how we ended up with the current deal and why the NC and MEC full heartedly support the TA? Are they all company shills? Gay frogs? What?
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by CMFIC
Is thinking long term is exchanging every ounce of leverage we'll ever have for a one time "bonus," some of the lowest hourly rates in the industry with no profit sharing? Not to mention a section 25 that offers less QOL than some regional airlines?

The player on the other side of the table is not the NMB. Don't sell yourself or our profession short. Let's not forget, the NMB has somehow been convinced (along with our NC) that this is a 920M gain offset by a savings to the company of only 64M. This is bullish**.

Our COO made more in his first 3 months at Spirit Airlines than you will for the next decade + under this T/A. If he gets us to sign off on this deal, he's worth every penny of that and more to SAVE.
Wether you are a yes or No voter, he makes some very good points.
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 10:56 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
Ok now explain how we ended up with the current deal and why the NC and MEC full heartedly support the TA? Are they all company shills? Gay frogs? What?
I would never disparage our Negotiating Committee, they've been mired in these negotiations for quite a while. Is it exhaustion, sleep deprivation, pressure from ALPA National, pressure from the NMB to get a deal done, Stockholm syndrome, groupthink, a desire to get their life back, running scared from a TRO, falling victim to highly skilled, highly compensated company negotiators?

I can't answer why we've been presented this insulting offer.
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 11:01 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

I’m against this thing too. I do feel that we could get a better deal than this TA. With that said, newsflash, it’s going to pass. These arguments aren’t going to accomplish anything, everyone has made up their minds
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 11:18 AM
  #16  
TrojanCMH's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheDudeabide
I’m against this thing too. I do feel that we could get a better deal than this TA. With that said, newsflash, it’s going to pass. These arguments aren’t going to accomplish anything, everyone has made up their minds
It's sad but I think you're right. I feel like the NC was under pressure from the NMB to put this out to a vote because the mediator thought it was a great deal (43% raise/biggest in history!!!) and was starting to shut us down at the table.
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 12:55 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 691
Likes: 37
Default

Just with PBS the company is saving a **** load of $$$. I have been calling Bs as well with these numbers. History repeats itself and god dam it , we are our own worst enemy. Viva el NO vote !
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 03:43 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: A320HD
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
Just with PBS the company is saving a **** load of $$$. I have been calling Bs as well with these numbers. History repeats itself and god dam it , we are our own worst enemy. Viva el NO vote !
Heck even without PBS they will be. No transition, no more random reserve drops, and without those measly rigs that PBS brings.
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 03:56 PM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NKSpilot
Easy - we are not “flushing our entire set of work rules down the toilet.”

What planet are you on?
Schedule integrity: gone

Being assigned to wait out your FDP at the airport by a gate agent: Reality (rationalizations: we get paid for it, they’ll never use that, it’s not the intent, are you kidding me?)

PBS: more work days, shorter vacations

All this for again, near bottom pay and a meager bonus. So much fear motivating yes votes. Repeating what others are saying, once you give up work rules, it is near impossible to get them back.
Reply
Old 02-09-2018 | 04:24 PM
  #20  
BillyBaroo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: A320 F.O.
Default

Originally Posted by Freightcowboy
How do we convince the company that we deserve more?? What ammo do we give the NC for that “battle”??

If this gets voted down it will be at least a 3 month process to get a survey done then how long to schedule more dates with the NMB when classes are being filled with our current CBA.

In a year maybe or maybe longer get $5 more an hour and losing a descent amount of cash.

Well in that time frame we are just gonna give Spirit Mgt more of a bonus by working under the current CBA.
Why is it that it has to be were “asking for more?” On the contrary, a number of items would be not asking for more, but “giving up less.” We all knew we would be giving up certain provisions of the CBA, just not to the extent we see in the TA.

And how do you know it will be three months? How about six, or two? Simple answer is you nor anyone else knows. But here is the question to ask: “which one has the watches, and which one has the time”
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HanSoolu
Envoy Airlines
153
07-15-2019 01:50 PM
Aviationluver
Aviation Law
4
05-23-2017 07:19 AM
JetsR4HotTubs
Aviation Law
6
12-27-2015 09:28 PM
cornfedgrowth
Aviation Law
11
02-09-2010 04:18 PM
MoonFallsDown
Leaving the Career
14
11-16-2009 05:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices