Search

Notices

Attrition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2022 | 10:32 AM
  #1561  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 362
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
Ted’s latest response to the attrition problem is “anybody that wants to leave, can leave”
Ted probably also once told his wife “this merger is a lock, $12m coming our way, and I’ll probably be the new CEO of the merged airline”
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 11:46 AM
  #1562  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
What did JetBlue give up to get their first year guys where they are today? And why should NK first year guys be paid any less than B6 first year guys? NK pilots have been waiting two contracts over a decade - waiting for NK management to provide B6 level first year pay without “wasting” leverage and it hasn’t happened.
it’s rude to answer a question with a question.
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 12:50 PM
  #1563  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
What did JetBlue give up to get their first year guys where they are today? And why should NK first year guys be paid any less than B6 first year guys? NK pilots have been waiting two contracts over a decade - waiting for NK management to provide B6 level first year pay without “wasting” leverage and it hasn’t happened.
1. If my memory serves me, the union passed back and forth pay scales with the company for years 2 to 12. It's possible that I am mixing up this negotiation with one from a previous airline, but it does happen where the union will only negotiate years 2 to 12, and first year pay is left up to management. That is why some contracts allow for management to unilaterally raise first-year pay, without approval from the union. As Frontier did in the not so distant past.

2. Now please answer, what would you give up for the other 95% of the Spirit pilot group, to get a first-year pay raise?
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 01:11 PM
  #1564  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
That’s not exactly what happened at f9. A base in the mid 50’s was negotiated and the company could raise it to 98.5% of second year. So the company paid for the raise. It wasn’t included in the overall economic proposal. Once raised it could not go down.
Even your "story" doesn't tell the whole story. It's unlikely that you know if anything was given up for the original 1st year pay unless you were on the negotiating committee, executive council or were close to someone who was.

But, let's assume you are correct. What would have to be given up in order to achieve the industry's lowest or nearly lowest 1st year pay??? Not much I hope... And the contract allowed management to raise 1st year pay without union approval, up to a limit.

So what I said was more or less correct.
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 01:27 PM
  #1565  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Even your "story" doesn't tell the whole story. It's unlikely that you know if anything was given up for the original 1st year pay unless you were on the negotiating committee, executive council or were close to someone who was.

But, let's assume you are correct. What would have to be given up in order to achieve the industry's lowest or nearly lowest 1st year pay??? Not much I hope... And the contract allowed management to raise 1st year pay without union approval, up to a limit.

So what I said was more or less correct.

yeah what you said was correct that’s why I deleted the post seconds later. A bit more to the story as it wasn’t like there was no protections (union approval). You can go ahead and assume I’m correct.
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 01:44 PM
  #1566  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
yeah what you said was correct that’s why I deleted the post seconds later. A bit more to the story as it wasn’t like there was no protections (union approval). You can go ahead and assume I’m correct.
Roger that...
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 02:59 PM
  #1567  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 29
From: baller, shot caller
Default

Y'all know what this place needs?

Higher first year pay
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 03:54 PM
  #1568  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,246
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
2. Now please answer, what would you give up for the other 95% of the Spirit pilot group, to get a first-year pay raise?
Erroneous question in two different regards.

1. NK management has already demonstrated that they are out the door, so they aren’t going to negotiate anything They're leaving it to whatever management group supersedes them.

2. PreCOVID, there was a LOT more than 5% first year guys. Growing 15% per year with three year upgrades, ~52% of pilots were CAs and ~48% were FOs, meaning nearly a third of the FOs WERE first year.

And with cheap (less than $50k a year) replacements, NK management had no incentive to either raise first year pay OR bring FO or junior CA pay up to industry standard.




Had we made them pay through the nose for every newbie brought on board they might have paid the more senior guys more to avoid attrition. As it was, we let them have a contract that made filling vacancies cheap for them and they used that to hold down pilot pay for everyone.

Prove me wrong.
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 04:09 PM
  #1569  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Erroneous question in two different regards.

1. NK management has already demonstrated that they are out the door, so they aren’t going to negotiate anything They're leaving it to whatever management group supersedes them.

2. PreCOVID, there was a LOT more than 5% first year guys. Growing 15% per year with three year upgrades, ~52% of pilots were CAs and ~48% were FOs, meaning nearly a third of the FOs WERE first year.

And with cheap (less than $50k a year) replacements, NK management had no incentive to either raise first year pay OR bring FO or junior CA pay up to industry standard.




Had we made them pay through the nose for every newbie brought on board they might have paid the more senior guys more to avoid attrition. As it was, we let them have a contract that made filling vacancies cheap for them and they used that to hold down pilot pay for everyone.

Prove me wrong.
Ok, what are you willing to give up for the other +84% of Spirit pilots to give the 1st year guys a raise?
Reply
Old 07-21-2022 | 04:11 PM
  #1570  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 60
Default

Hard to go back in time and prove something that never happened. When contracts are negotiated your negotiating a total economic value over the length of the agreement. Dollar amounts are assigned to language. Generally speaking management doesn’t care much how the $ is divided up. As long as it’s reasonable. So thier not going to pay more on all scales without giving up some other costs. Rig/vac/medical… ect… I’m out after that statement. You two have fun.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 11:32 AM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 07:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 08:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 07:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices