Notices

Attrition

Old 10-09-2023 | 01:27 PM
  #3321  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I just think it's a dumb position. If withholding support for the merger (to pressure a raise prior to JCBA) ends up being the straw that breaks the camels back, and the merger ends up being blocked in part because of it, I don't think that will prove to be a wise decision.
Our MEC like our management has no plan forward.

Even a negotiating committee member left for United in the middle of the process.
Reply
Old 10-09-2023 | 02:15 PM
  #3322  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 691
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
Raise awareness to who exactly? The company knows the info and doesn’t care, they are loosing money and it’s not due to pilot attrition. Labor costs and high fuel costs combined with low revenue. People want to fly first class and they want to fly internationally. We don’t provide those right now except south of the border which is not the money making international flying I’m talking about. You can kick and scream all you want, but replacing the MEC won’t do anything. I can’t believe you would think that would matter.

Put yourself in TC’s position. He already raised pilot pay once to stem attrition. If it didn’t help then why would he raise pay again?

All a new MEC can do is ASK for more money. That’s it.

I get that you’re upset, but I think you’re focusing on the wrong end of the formula. If you want a fast change in your situation the best thing as others have said is to leave and go elsewhere. If you want to stick it out here, I do fully think it will get better, but it’s not a quick fix and replacing the MEC going into a merger is irresponsible and selfish in my view.
It's not even about asking for more money. It's about the same $h!t every time with the selling tactics. Phone calls going out harassing and convincing people to vote yes. Road show were more of a "VOTE YES OR ELSE" and look where we are at again massively below our peers. gtfo, at this point , might as well get some new blood on the table.
Reply
Old 10-09-2023 | 03:11 PM
  #3323  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 141
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
It's not even about asking for more money. It's about the same $h!t every time with the selling tactics. Phone calls going out harassing and convincing people to vote yes. Road show were more of a "VOTE YES OR ELSE" and look where we are at again massively below our peers. gtfo, at this point , might as well get some new blood on the table.
Doing anything until the merger trial decision is out is silly
Reply
Old 10-09-2023 | 03:41 PM
  #3324  
Irishblackbird's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
Raise awareness to who exactly? The company knows the info and doesn’t care, they are loosing money and it’s not due to pilot attrition. Labor costs and high fuel costs combined with low revenue. People want to fly first class and they want to fly internationally. We don’t provide those right now except south of the border which is not the money making international flying I’m talking about. You can kick and scream all you want, but replacing the MEC won’t do anything. I can’t believe you would think that would matter.

Put yourself in TC’s position. He already raised pilot pay once to stem attrition. If it didn’t help then why would he raise pay again?

All a new MEC can do is ASK for more money. That’s it.

I get that you’re upset, but I think you’re focusing on the wrong end of the formula. If you want a fast change in your situation the best thing as others have said is to leave and go elsewhere. If you want to stick it out here, I do fully think it will get better, but it’s not a quick fix and replacing the MEC going into a merger is irresponsible and selfish in my view.
Raise awareness to who, you ask. I dont know. I'm not the one who sends an email to the Pilot group emphasizing the perceived plight the Company and pilot group faces. I also never said I was unhappy or upset, but like other professional pilots in our industry I want to be competitive in compensation and work rules in the "ever-evolving landscape and rapid and profound changes" as stated in the email. An email that would also suggest that that we would need a LOA to address these issues similar to Jblue. Yes the company knows the info and the pilots are aware of the situation, so what is the point of the email to pilot group other than reinforce the fact that we are now on the bottom tier in relation to our peers at other airlines? Or is it to state that the negotiating committee failed and came in very low "in a ever-evolving rapidly changing landscape" and refused to go back to the table after other airlines came out with their TAs that were much better than ours. Instead of re-polling the pilot group they chose to hard sell us to take the deal.
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 04:06 AM
  #3325  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 467
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Irishblackbird
Raise awareness to who, you ask. I dont know. I'm not the one who sends an email to the Pilot group emphasizing the perceived plight the Company and pilot group faces. I also never said I was unhappy or upset, but like other professional pilots in our industry I want to be competitive in compensation and work rules in the "ever-evolving landscape and rapid and profound changes" as stated in the email. An email that would also suggest that that we would need a LOA to address these issues similar to Jblue. Yes the company knows the info and the pilots are aware of the situation, so what is the point of the email to pilot group other than reinforce the fact that we are now on the bottom tier in relation to our peers at other airlines? Or is it to state that the negotiating committee failed and came in very low "in a ever-evolving rapidly changing landscape" and refused to go back to the table after other airlines came out with their TAs that were much better than ours. Instead of re-polling the pilot group they chose to hard sell us to take the deal.
We all want better pay and work rules. That’s not something unique to those asking to replace our MEC and NC. You voted yes knowing what DELTA had on the table, that’s on you. Or maybe you voted No, either way the pilot group voted yes. That’s not really on the NC or MEC.
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 05:01 AM
  #3326  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 9
From: Student of the game
Default

Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
We all want better pay and work rules. That’s not something unique to those asking to replace our MEC and NC. You voted yes knowing what DELTA had on the table, that’s on you. Or maybe you voted No, either way the pilot group voted yes. That’s not really on the NC or MEC.
It's 100% on the MEC. Delta's numbers were out well before we had a TA and JBs came out a week before our vote closed. As soon as JB's came out they should have taken it back to the table.
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 08:59 AM
  #3327  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 236
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
It's 100% on the MEC. Delta's numbers were out well before we had a TA and JBs came out a week before our vote closed. As soon as JB's came out they should have taken it back to the table.
6 CA vacancies this month
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 09:19 AM
  #3328  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 9
From: Student of the game
Default

Originally Posted by SlimBob
6 CA vacancies this month
I'm surprised they are running any with how many planes are sitting.
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 09:30 AM
  #3329  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 467
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
It's 100% on the MEC. Delta's numbers were out well before we had a TA and JBs came out a week before our vote closed. As soon as JB's came out they should have taken it back to the table.
Ok, so we both agree that everyone (MEC and pilot group) knew that the TA we voted in was below Delta, JetBlue, Hawaiian, and Alaska. And United, AA, and southwest were all negotiating and realistically going to be on par or better than Delta, which would then cause snap ups in everyone’s clause. That info was not a secret that only the MEC was aware of and chose to withhold. That was known to every pilot on property.

You think that we should have cancelled it and renegotiated, I’m generally in agreement with you there. I however don’t agree that’s it’s a guarantee that we would have achieved anything more and I don’t fault the MEC for going forward, there is a chance that we would have gotten nothing more and potentially would be still at our old pay rates. Frontier, allegiant, and southwest have not increased pay yet and are surviving. Their was risk involved in voting no, and the MEC and the majority of the pilot group made a risk assessment choice and voted yes.
Reply
Old 10-10-2023 | 11:42 AM
  #3330  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 467
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
It's not even about asking for more money. It's about the same $h!t every time with the selling tactics. Phone calls going out harassing and convincing people to vote yes. Road show were more of a "VOTE YES OR ELSE" and look where we are at again massively below our peers. gtfo, at this point , might as well get some new blood on the table.
I’m all for after merger is done. PS and SM have been on the NC too long, and I can’t stand their sell tactics either, which is why I take what they say with a huge grain of salt.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 11:32 AM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 07:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 08:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 07:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices