![]() |
Originally Posted by GWY320
(Post 3549994)
I think the negotiating committee intends to include an increase to jetBlue rates as part of the transition process agreement (just reading the tea leaves, most likely wrong).
Does anyone know if there is precedent in prior mergers for that to happen? Hopefully they will be more clear on what they intend to fight for in a TPA. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3550003)
I believe that is what happened with AK/VA, VA snapped up to AK, and this is the goal for the TPA.
Whatever we get now we'll be stuck with until the JCBA, which is years down the line. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3550052)
I doubt it, not with this NC.
Whatever we get now we'll be stuck with until the JCBA, which is years down the line. |
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3550073)
There’s no way you can possibly know that, just like there’s no way you can be sure that management will rush to return to the table if this agreement is voted down. Management might immediately return to the table. They also might agree to raise pay to B6 in a TPA. There is no way to know for sure, and stating anything for certain is fearmongering
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3550073)
There’s no way you can possibly know that, just like there’s no way you can be sure that management will rush to return to the table if this agreement is voted down. Management might immediately return to the table. They also might agree to raise pay to B6 in a TPA. There is no way to know for sure, and stating anything for certain is fearmongering
"We'll get 'em next time" |
Originally Posted by GWY320
(Post 3549994)
I think the negotiating committee intends to include an increase to jetBlue rates as part of the transition process agreement (just reading the tea leaves, most likely wrong).
Does anyone know if there is precedent in prior mergers for that to happen? Hopefully they will be more clear on what they intend to fight for in a TPA. |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3549610)
You exceeded current legacy pay rates with your AIP.
Bragging about matching 4 year old pay rates isn't saying much for B6 And no, it's not my intention to be bragging about anything. My intention is for all of us to be paid fairly, regardless of the business model. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3549469)
Then let Spirit come up to legacy rates too. After all, the legacies haven't had a pay raise in 4 years.
And you can damn well bet B6 stood up in cold ass NY on the streets and demanded it for most of that journey to legacy rates. You get what you want when you demand it, not settle for what the company is willing to offer. Go to sleep. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk Stand down.... talking to these people is like talking to the wall. |
Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
(Post 3550203)
Stand down.... talking to these people is like talking to the wall.
I personally can't give away the leverage we have today for these rates and the lack of a snap up. I will vote -no- but I think this will pass. If this acquisition falls through we will pay a big price, if it doesn't we look weak. People will vote what's best for them, such is life. Sorry. |
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 3551505)
Not all of us.
I personally can't give away the leverage we have today for these rates and the lack of a snap up. I will vote -no- but I think this will pass. If this acquisition falls through we will pay a big price, if it doesn't we look weak. People will vote what's best for them, such is life. Sorry. so in other-words, if the TA passes and the JetBlue merger fails. We go back straight to negotiations and we have just as much leverage. (Because using your logic this is a crappy TA and people will still be leaving anyways) we are in a win-win situation if we say yes to this TA! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands