Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2015 | 03:20 PM
  #14141  
InTrail's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Hugedouche
So what you are in effect saying that I would need to become the biggest dumbass in the world after 24 months so that I am not qualified to do anything? =) I can get started on that right away
Unless you are disabled and unable to work. Remember though it doesnt require you to be a dumbass, just no other skills. I suppose that if you are in your first year pay the field is widened for a simple loss of your medical and otherwise capable.
Old 09-30-2015 | 04:34 PM
  #14142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by InTrail
Unless you are disabled and unable to work. Remember though it doesnt require you to be a dumbass, just no other skills. I suppose that if you are in your first year pay the field is widened for a simple loss of your medical and otherwise capable.
This is not the interpretation I got straight from the R&I committee.

LTD pays for 24 months (after a 90 day waiting period. Hope you have 216 hours in your sick bank) and the only way you can keep getting the benefit payment after 24 months is if you can be defined by Social Security Administration as disabled. There are plenty of situations where you lose your medical but the SSA won't define you as disabled. No medical and bye bye LTD at 24months.

MAX pay is $5000 for FOs and $10000 for CAs if they participate in the buy up. If on the rare chance you can get defined by the SSA as disabled at the 24 month mark to keep getting paid they will reduce your benefit by the amount you get from social security.

Plain and simple: the plan needs to have a higher benefit amount. Qualifying needs to be based on not holding a first class medical. The only way for it to stop paying you is you get your first class back or you turn 65 years old.

Any contract that does not have this I will vote no to. It does not matter what the rest of the contract says if you don't have a medical and cannot work. Young or old you can lose your medical at your next exam without warning. Are we willing to vote for a contract that doesn't insure a multimillion dollar career? I'm not!
Old 09-30-2015 | 05:37 PM
  #14143  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
This is not the interpretation I got straight from the R&I committee.

LTD pays for 24 months (after a 90 day waiting period. Hope you have 216 hours in your sick bank) and the only way you can keep getting the benefit payment after 24 months is if you can be defined by Social Security Administration as disabled. There are plenty of situations where you lose your medical but the SSA won't define you as disabled. No medical and bye bye LTD at 24months.

MAX pay is $5000 for FOs and $10000 for CAs if they participate in the buy up. If on the rare chance you can get defined by the SSA as disabled at the 24 month mark to keep getting paid they will reduce your benefit by the amount you get from social security.

Plain and simple: the plan needs to have a higher benefit amount. Qualifying needs to be based on not holding a first class medical. The only way for it to stop paying you is you get your first class back or you turn 65 years old.

Any contract that does not have this I will vote no to. It does not matter what the rest of the contract says if you don't have a medical and cannot work. Young or old you can lose your medical at your next exam without warning. Are we willing to vote for a contract that doesn't insure a multimillion dollar career? I'm not!

This is about right. In my case though I didn't see the first payment till about the 5 1/2 month mark. At 90 days you are eligible for LTD, but the gathering of info from doctors will push your first payment out some time. They back pay you from the eligibility date. Your first 2 payments have SS tax and federal taken out. After that you are given the option for full payment and be responsible for your own tax payments. Pay is 60% of your monthly. My case as an FO put my pay without tax removed at about $3000.00 a month. Since the company pays our policies it is considered taxable income. The $5000 and $10000 numbers are misleading due to you will receive 60% of that for your pay, hence my payment of $3000.00. Basically plan on a new career with this policy.
Forgot to add the company pays your insurance premium for 9 months, after that you are given the option of cobra or find your own policy. Cobra for me only with our mid-tier plan came in at about $700 a month for health only so keep that in mind also!

Last edited by MATEN308; 09-30-2015 at 06:00 PM. Reason: Added health benefits
Old 09-30-2015 | 05:56 PM
  #14144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

It's a joke. I hope you got better and back to work.
Old 09-30-2015 | 06:14 PM
  #14145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MATEN308
This is about right. In my case though I didn't see the first payment till about the 5 1/2 month mark. At 90 days you are eligible for LTD, but the gathering of info from doctors will push your first payment out some time. They back pay you from the eligibility date. Your first 2 payments have SS tax and federal taken out. After that you are given the option for full payment and be responsible for your own tax payments. Pay is 60% of your monthly. My case as an FO put my pay without tax removed at about $3000.00 a month. Since the company pays our policies it is considered taxable income. The $5000 and $10000 numbers are misleading due to you will receive 60% of that for your pay, hence my payment of $3000.00. Basically plan on a new career with this policy.
Forgot to add the company pays your insurance premium for 9 months, after that you are given the option of cobra or find your own policy. Cobra for me only with our mid-tier plan came in at about $700 a month for health only so keep that in mind also!

All this is true and its a bigger headache than imaginable. I haven't hit the 9 month mark yet so I was (blissfully) unaware of the fact that I'm going to have to pay for cobra, honestly I'm not sure what I am going to do now.
Old 09-30-2015 | 07:22 PM
  #14146  
Lemonade's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: A 320
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
All this is true and its a bigger headache than imaginable. I haven't hit the 9 month mark yet so I was (blissfully) unaware of the fact that I'm going to have to pay for cobra, honestly I'm not sure what I am going to do now.
Ok, so now that that has been established you remember that our NC has clearly said that LTD is not being addressed in these "focused negotiations" .

Keep em or pull em?
Old 09-30-2015 | 07:56 PM
  #14147  
PrattFan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Slowly drifting left of course!
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade
Ok, so now that that has been established you remember that our NC has clearly said that LTD is not being addressed in these "focused negotiations" .

Keep em or pull em?
Argue your position all you want, but at least try to be factual.

From the last NC update...
Modest progress was made on several work rule issues including premium pay, but many issues—including scope, disability and the excise tax mandated by the Affordable Care Act—remain open. In addition, there are still significant differences on compensation and retirement.

Oh yeah, it's the internet, never let facts get in the way of a good story. Sorry, I forgot.
Old 09-30-2015 | 08:11 PM
  #14148  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade
Ok, so now that that has been established you remember that our NC has clearly said that LTD is not being addressed in these "focused negotiations" .

Keep em or pull em?
Where did you get that?
Old 10-01-2015 | 04:54 AM
  #14149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lemonade
Ok, so now that that has been established you remember that our NC has clearly said that LTD is not being addressed in these "focused negotiations" .

Keep em or pull em?
Any and all credibility you might have had was just lost.
Old 10-01-2015 | 11:21 AM
  #14150  
Lemonade's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: A 320
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Any and all credibility you might have had was just lost.
Ok, you are right. I went back and reviewed all NC emails and their survey. While their details are vague there is reasonable information to suggest that LTD is in their core definition of 'focused negotiations' as a key financial section.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices