Search

Notices

Vacancy 19-04

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2018 | 03:07 PM
  #71  
rightside02's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 6
From: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Default

Ego amongst other things you have mentioned.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 05:31 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
For those in the know...
Why is LAX 756 Captain so much more senior than LAX 737 Captain?



Have you seen the 737 cockpit?
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 06:32 PM
  #73  
HercAC's Avatar
Pura Vida
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Jorge Alfa
Default

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis
Have you seen the 737 cockpit?
Ever so slightly larger than the 757 production line😳
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 10:48 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rightside02
Ego amongst other things you have mentioned.
So many guys I’ve flown with in LAX/SFO always seem to tell random people in airports or out on layovers that they fly the 767. Which is interesting because we don’t see 767’s in SFO... sounds like ego to me.
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 06:44 AM
  #75  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
For those in the know...
Why is LAX 756 Captain so much more senior than LAX 737 Captain?

What I hear from from others is "essentially the same pay"... "West coast 757 flying is not near a good as the 737 flying"... "I'd rather go to Hawaii in the 737 than EWR in the 757 for the same pay"...etc....

While the aircraft certainly has a roomier cockpit and nice to fly (according to those that have), how does that account for such a steep difference in Captain seniority between the fleets?
The biggest reason is that our (756) blended rate is artificially high because of the 764. So if you’re going to be on reserve in both categories, the 756 will pay much higher. Another reason is that the 757 is a much superior airplane compared to the Guppy. Much less fatiguing!!! I’ve flown both, so I can attest to that.
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 06:56 AM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

It’s not “artificially” higher b/c of blended rate. It’s just higher. It’s one fleet and from the west coast you could find yourself on the -300 or even -400 if on reserve, or even with a line - charters, mx repos, etc. Is the 737 fleet blend artificially lower if you never see the -700? Apart from that I agree, holy cow is it a better cockpit!
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 08:18 AM
  #77  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D
It’s not “artificially” higher b/c of blended rate. It’s just higher. It’s one fleet and from the west coast you could find yourself on the -300 or even -400 if on reserve, or even with a line - charters, mx repos, etc. Is the 737 fleet blend artificially lower if you never see the -700? Apart from that I agree, holy cow is it a better cockpit!
The problem is that most Captains go non-current on the -400 for at least three months because they never see it. The West Coast never sees a 764. In fact the only 764 at a West Coast base is Delta’s in SFO. We only have 16 764s and much more Guppy-700s. Almost impossible to not fly that airplane, especially on reserve.

My comment about the 756 blended rate being artificially high is two fold. The 756 fleet is the only fleet which the blended rate is higher than all but one of the specific airplane rates. Also, the 764 shouldn’t pay the same rate as a 777-300ER.
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 10:29 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SUX4U
So many guys I’ve flown with in LAX/SFO always seem to tell random people in airports or out on layovers that they fly the 767. Which is interesting because we don’t see 767’s in SFO... sounds like ego to me.
Guys tell people they fly the “737” when in fact they are flying the guppy. Sounds like the same thing to me.
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 11:02 AM
  #79  
Guppy reserve EWR
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by O2pilot
Guys tell people they fly the “737” when in fact they are flying the guppy. Sounds like the same thing to me.
Wait a minute... an O2pilot making fun of a 737.

I'm still laughing at that one!

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 11:31 AM
  #80  
davessn763's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
The problem is that most Captains go non-current on the -400 for at least three months because they never see it. The West Coast never sees a 764. In fact the only 764 at a West Coast base is Delta’s in SFO. We only have 16 764s and much more Guppy-700s. Almost impossible to not fly that airplane, especially on reserve.

My comment about the 756 blended rate being artificially high is two fold. The 756 fleet is the only fleet which the blended rate is higher than all but one of the specific airplane rates. Also, the 764 shouldn’t pay the same rate as a 777-300ER.
Then neither should the 787-8. Our pay banding is a joke and so is Delta’s.

So should we pay less for the 764 and 787-8? I’m sure the company would love that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sarahswhere
United
64
05-20-2015 12:58 PM
steve0617
United
1
10-03-2014 01:28 PM
C-17 Driver
United
47
07-18-2014 07:08 PM
LeeMat
United
217
02-06-2013 07:04 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
26
08-03-2007 01:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices