Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL 777 Fleet Reduction >

UAL 777 Fleet Reduction

Search
Notices

UAL 777 Fleet Reduction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2020, 03:48 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Default

Reducing flights doesn’t mean they are permanently parking jets. Some will go into maintenance mods or paint ahead of schedule and some will be redeployed domestically. If you look at the Surplus Reduction Lines (50 hrs of pay to stay at home), you’ll see that there’s a ton of SRLs on the 777 fleet and barely any on the 787. Why? It would seem that the older 777 fleet has more opportunities for maintenance compared to the newer 787 fleet. In this respect it seems that UAL’s management team is quite proactive. On a similar note, I’d be shocked to see UAL dump any 767s simply because the flying will return and there’s no viable 767 replacement aircraft on our books.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
globetruck is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 05:43 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reelbigchair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Thor View Post
I’m sure the company put out a press release, I’ve been seeing it in the news. I haven’t seen any confirmation of the specifics of the drawdown but based on the SRL for the fleet I think it’s a safe guess.
triples may be just going domestic instead of getting parked. Without all the single and double augmentation even if the plane flew the same hours (impossible) your staffing needs would be much lower.
reelbigchair is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 06:09 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
I bet they early retire some older 756/767
What happens with the surplus of pilots if that happens in any airplane? Are seat locks waived so surplus pilots can move to other airplanes?
rvfanatic is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 06:14 AM
  #14  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
I want see THAT full stop!! Hahaha!!!
It's a 4700ft runway. I'm sure it can do it.
They have a nice fly-in every now and then. Could time it with one of those!
dera is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 06:27 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
Default

The only change so far in the 777 is the number in Maintenance. there are currently 7 in mods for seat changes. 6 for intl Polaris and 1 for domestic cattle car (which was planned long before COVID-19) there are 3 others out for HMV or Paint. There are still 2 more set up for the conversion to cattle car (both 2001 builds) and 4 more waiting for Polaris (1 97 and 3 99 builds). I think at this point UA is trying to make what little lemonade they can out of the Coronavirus lemons by getting maintenance/paint/mods done. It would have to last much longer before they would start making long term fleet decisions of any significance, so any plane that they were planning on having around in 2021 won't be getting retired based on what has happened so far. That logic would cover the entire WB fleet. Maybe retire some narrowbodies a few months earlier than you were planning. IE if you were planning on retiring at the end of the year, maybe you retire now.
GoCats67 is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 07:05 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Holy overreaction Batman!!! The Company is not going to park jets that were desperately needed prior to COVID-19. This Coronavirus thing is bad, but temporary. Parking jets is not really a temporary solution. We all need to tap the brakes and stop this Chicken Little attitude. We get paid very well to not panic when bad things happen. So we need to stop panicking until there is something to panic about!?!?
DashTrash is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 07:58 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
Holy overreaction Batman!!! The Company is not going to park jets that were desperately needed prior to COVID-19. This Coronavirus thing is bad, but temporary. Parking jets is not really a temporary solution. We all need to tap the brakes and stop this Chicken Little attitude. We get paid very well to not panic when bad things happen. So we need to stop panicking until there is something to panic about!?!?
Plan for the worst and hope for the best. Not panic; just discussing what could happen in an economic downturn triggered by the public's reaction to coronavirus. If I were a junior WB FO or NB CA, I would plan my monthly budget on NBFO pay until this threat passes.
Andy is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 08:06 AM
  #18  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

The company has not announced the retirement of any 777s, or any other aircraft. They haven’t even announced any hastened retirement of older 757s. As others have said: reduction in utilization. 3/4 full 767 is more profitable than a half-full 777-300. And, there really is no replacement aircraft for a 767-300.

To the OP: the same media brought us this gem out of the MH370 tragedy:
Attached Images
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 08:12 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by rvfanatic View Post
What happens with the surplus of pilots if that happens in any airplane? Are seat locks waived so surplus pilots can move to other airplanes?
The company is already addressing that issue. We have COLA offers, reduction lines, and we’ll see lower line values until this passes. Our contractual penalties and high attrition make a furlough prohibitively expensive unless the company is absolutely sure that the public reaction to the virus is going to be extreme and long term. Because of this, anything short of an outlook that this will last for several years, shrinking with attrition and possible small displacement bids is a worst case scenario. It’s far less expensive to put some things on hold for now and carry the expense of surplus employees, than to trigger massive training cycles from top end displacements, and the expense of contractual penalties that are triggered if they were to furlough. For now we just keep chugging along since the company needs us in place when the public reaction to this ends. People need to chill. We’re getting beat up pretty bad right now, but we will survive, recover, then get back to the expansion plans that we had.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-08-2020, 08:20 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 258
Default

There will be furloughs! This epidemic will get way worst before it gets better and so much for the pilot shortage outcry.
tommy2times is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Al Czervik
Republic Airways
500
10-20-2019 06:47 AM
jsled
United
47
05-04-2013 07:56 AM
JetPhotos
Your Photos and Videos
2
12-21-2012 04:39 PM
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
Sir James
Major
3
03-02-2006 02:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices