UAL 777 Fleet Reduction
#11
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Reducing flights doesn’t mean they are permanently parking jets. Some will go into maintenance mods or paint ahead of schedule and some will be redeployed domestically. If you look at the Surplus Reduction Lines (50 hrs of pay to stay at home), you’ll see that there’s a ton of SRLs on the 777 fleet and barely any on the 787. Why? It would seem that the older 777 fleet has more opportunities for maintenance compared to the newer 787 fleet. In this respect it seems that UAL’s management team is quite proactive. On a similar note, I’d be shocked to see UAL dump any 767s simply because the flying will return and there’s no viable 767 replacement aircraft on our books.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#12
triples may be just going domestic instead of getting parked. Without all the single and double augmentation even if the plane flew the same hours (impossible) your staffing needs would be much lower.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
The only change so far in the 777 is the number in Maintenance. there are currently 7 in mods for seat changes. 6 for intl Polaris and 1 for domestic cattle car (which was planned long before COVID-19) there are 3 others out for HMV or Paint. There are still 2 more set up for the conversion to cattle car (both 2001 builds) and 4 more waiting for Polaris (1 97 and 3 99 builds). I think at this point UA is trying to make what little lemonade they can out of the Coronavirus lemons by getting maintenance/paint/mods done. It would have to last much longer before they would start making long term fleet decisions of any significance, so any plane that they were planning on having around in 2021 won't be getting retired based on what has happened so far. That logic would cover the entire WB fleet. Maybe retire some narrowbodies a few months earlier than you were planning. IE if you were planning on retiring at the end of the year, maybe you retire now.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Holy overreaction Batman!!! The Company is not going to park jets that were desperately needed prior to COVID-19. This Coronavirus thing is bad, but temporary. Parking jets is not really a temporary solution. We all need to tap the brakes and stop this Chicken Little attitude. We get paid very well to not panic when bad things happen. So we need to stop panicking until there is something to panic about!?!?
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Holy overreaction Batman!!! The Company is not going to park jets that were desperately needed prior to COVID-19. This Coronavirus thing is bad, but temporary. Parking jets is not really a temporary solution. We all need to tap the brakes and stop this Chicken Little attitude. We get paid very well to not panic when bad things happen. So we need to stop panicking until there is something to panic about!?!?
#18
The company has not announced the retirement of any 777s, or any other aircraft. They haven’t even announced any hastened retirement of older 757s. As others have said: reduction in utilization. 3/4 full 767 is more profitable than a half-full 777-300. And, there really is no replacement aircraft for a 767-300.
To the OP: the same media brought us this gem out of the MH370 tragedy:
To the OP: the same media brought us this gem out of the MH370 tragedy:
#19
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
The company is already addressing that issue. We have COLA offers, reduction lines, and we’ll see lower line values until this passes. Our contractual penalties and high attrition make a furlough prohibitively expensive unless the company is absolutely sure that the public reaction to the virus is going to be extreme and long term. Because of this, anything short of an outlook that this will last for several years, shrinking with attrition and possible small displacement bids is a worst case scenario. It’s far less expensive to put some things on hold for now and carry the expense of surplus employees, than to trigger massive training cycles from top end displacements, and the expense of contractual penalties that are triggered if they were to furlough. For now we just keep chugging along since the company needs us in place when the public reaction to this ends. People need to chill. We’re getting beat up pretty bad right now, but we will survive, recover, then get back to the expansion plans that we had.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post