UAL Vaccination
#1051
Banned
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
By October 25th this is gonna be blown up...still not taking this drug...Obama party's with a 1000 elites and we need the vax...how many did we fly there...it was July 4th Biden told your not to have a party...but Obama is ok because their "suffocated and vaccinated!" That's what that dingbat said...unreal
#1052
Banned
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
So the FDA admits the PCR test doesn't isolate COVID otherwise known as the SARS-CoV-2 strain. The vaccine don't protect your from Covid and they never produced a single sample of COVID 19.
This whole disease is the seasonal flu you sheep! Show me the evidence COVID even exists! You cant!
You all took these mRNA drugs to prop up the balance sheats of big pharma...4 billion last quarter alone and now your health is in question...
This whole disease is the seasonal flu you sheep! Show me the evidence COVID even exists! You cant!
You all took these mRNA drugs to prop up the balance sheats of big pharma...4 billion last quarter alone and now your health is in question...
You should be fired from you’re job just based on the fact that you are bat **** crazy.
#1053
That’s an interesting question. I’m not aware of any studies being done specifically on the vaccine’s effect on those who’ve recovered from the virus, & it’s probably being placed further on the back-burner as research largely focuses on those who are more vulnerable- not less.
We don’t know at this point how long our bodies remain tolerant to the virus. Also, your symptoms can be the result of a number of factors, including viral load of exposure. So it could be that your body’s a superstar at virus crushing as you claim, but it could also be that you were only exposed to a low level of virus. Would that then mean you developed a lower immuno-response and are more likely to get reinfected than someone who had a higher exposure? Again, we need more time & research to know.
So the vaccine’s effect on your immune system probably falls somewhere between completely moot & a booster. In time we may get a clearer picture of what the most effective timeline for post-recovery vaccination looks like, but for now, it’s safe & functions as greater assurance that you’re out of the supply chain of viral hosts. Keeps grandma safe & gets us all closer to the time we can take these damn masks of & get back to senior man pay & summer vacations in Europe.
We don’t know at this point how long our bodies remain tolerant to the virus. Also, your symptoms can be the result of a number of factors, including viral load of exposure. So it could be that your body’s a superstar at virus crushing as you claim, but it could also be that you were only exposed to a low level of virus. Would that then mean you developed a lower immuno-response and are more likely to get reinfected than someone who had a higher exposure? Again, we need more time & research to know.
So the vaccine’s effect on your immune system probably falls somewhere between completely moot & a booster. In time we may get a clearer picture of what the most effective timeline for post-recovery vaccination looks like, but for now, it’s safe & functions as greater assurance that you’re out of the supply chain of viral hosts. Keeps grandma safe & gets us all closer to the time we can take these damn masks of & get back to senior man pay & summer vacations in Europe.
This statement is the biggest untruth I've read here so far. I'm not going to inundate date you with links but I ask that you look at recent studies from the Cleveland Clinic as well as the UK. Not only is it unnecessary to mandate a vaccine for those previously diagnosed with Covid but a second shot, considered the norm for Pfizer and Moderna, can do far more damage to an already robust immune system. Covid survivors are showing longer lasting immunity than previously thought.
#1054
In the current climate how are we supposed to determine the most upheld and legitimate studies? I hate sounding like a conspiracy theorist but these days you can bet that any news (including COVID studies) that run counter to the “accepted” narrative are censored or at least subject to selective distribution. To be honest I’ve been conditioned in the past year to believe those storylines more than the ones that make it to the mainstream.
We could have a greater discussion about whether Mark Zuckerburg & Jack Dorsey should be the arbiters of speech in our society, but don’t buy into the narrative that just because they are censoring something, it necessarily means they are part of a conspiracy to hide the truth from you. In general, the mainstream narrative got to be mainstream because it’s upheld by the majority of experts in the relevant field. Not a sexy narrative, I know, but the simplest explanation is often the most likely to be true.
#1055
New Hire
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
"233 new cases of covid" search that in google and tell me something is weird.
#1056
Every time someone on this forum tells me to Google “X”, I Google “X conspiracy” & it’s often enlightening. Without this thread, I’d be unaware of so much of the misinformation being fed to the willing public, so thanks for keeping me informed. The number I found was 322, though.
#1057
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Speed tape and prayers
What it feels like reading this thread.
#1058
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
I know it’s not what you want to hear but for the most part, that “accepted” narrative is the upheld & legitimate one. In general, CDC- good (not perfect, but good), op-ed by a random MD- not as good, YouTube video- bad. Peer-reviewed studies and findings published across multiple established outlets (AP, WSJ, WaPo, etc.)- good; anecdotal ideas & theories circulating on Facebook- bad.
We could have a greater discussion about whether Mark Zuckerburg & Jack Dorsey should be the arbiters of speech in our society, but don’t buy into the narrative that just because they are censoring something, it necessarily means they are part of a conspiracy to hide the truth from you. In general, the mainstream narrative got to be mainstream because it’s upheld by the majority of experts in the relevant field. Not a sexy narrative, I know, but the simplest explanation is often the most likely to be true.
We could have a greater discussion about whether Mark Zuckerburg & Jack Dorsey should be the arbiters of speech in our society, but don’t buy into the narrative that just because they are censoring something, it necessarily means they are part of a conspiracy to hide the truth from you. In general, the mainstream narrative got to be mainstream because it’s upheld by the majority of experts in the relevant field. Not a sexy narrative, I know, but the simplest explanation is often the most likely to be true.
#1059
Banned
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Every time someone on this forum tells me to Google “X”, I Google “X conspiracy” & it’s often enlightening. Without this thread, I’d be unaware of so much of the misinformation being fed to the willing public, so thanks for keeping me informed. The number I found was 322, though.
#1060
Honestly, all this misinformation is completely out of hand. I don’t know about you, but I’m pretty sick of pretending it is normal. At what point do we start treating these people how they treat us? We are winning. Once all the mandates start coming in and they still refuse to do their very small part, can we then ostracize them? Serious question. At what point do they become a huge burden on civilized society that is no longer tenable? Anyway, just a rant I guess.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM



