Search

Notices

UAL Vaccination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2021 | 08:51 AM
  #381  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear;[url=tel:3263758
3263758]It’s not a guarantee but yes, that’s definitely the likeliest outcome. Understand I’m not trying to pretend your vaccinated parents are at great risk, just pointing out that infection after vaccination is not an impossibility. This issue is not really my battle.

What I don’t understand is how these vaccines are at once a near universally effective solution & a bioethical nightmare tantamount to child torture. They work. They’re safe. If you’re comfortable with your odds of surviving the virus (I am) but afraid of unproven boogeyman issues with the vaccine (which even if true are statistically less significant than the actual proven risks of said virus) I think your ability to understand data is in question. Still, I’m not for forced vaccination. But we are seeing right now in this country how vaccine hesitant populations are being impacted by an ongoing pandemic that is in full retreat where vaccination is common. Personally, I’d rather see more people get vaccinated than idly sit in a vector supply chain & let it mutate until it beats our immunity & we’re back to square 1, but that’s me.
There are sectors that are higher than others, but are still continually trending lower. Mutants don’t beat immunity but exposure to them adds to immunity. Studies from UoL, John’s-Hopkins and others have recently performed studies to support this.

The aggregate of the efficacy you state, the 90% chance one won’t get Covid, the 99+% chance one won’t die from Covid, and herd immunity from both vaccines and infection, make the odds of a vaccinated relative contracting the disease virtually nil; one in many, many millions, same with the odds for unvaccinated youth.

This has nothing to do with the health and safety of grandma and grandpa or child torture (shame on you for gaslighting) it’s about manipulating the population to be lock-step in thought by the “scary” scenarios being propagated.
Old 07-15-2021 | 02:17 PM
  #382  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
There are sectors that are higher than others, but are still continually trending lower. Mutants don’t beat immunity but exposure to them adds to immunity. Studies from UoL, John’s-Hopkins and others have recently performed studies to support this.

The aggregate of the efficacy you state, the 90% chance one won’t get Covid, the 99+% chance one won’t die from Covid, and herd immunity from both vaccines and infection, make the odds of a vaccinated relative contracting the disease virtually nil; one in many, many millions, same with the odds for unvaccinated youth.

This has nothing to do with the health and safety of grandma and grandpa or child torture (shame on you for gaslighting) it’s about manipulating the population to be lock-step in thought by the “scary” scenarios being propagated.
In countering the argument you think I’m making, you’re half making my point. We both agree the vaccine is highly effective. If you looked at all data with that same objectivity you’d see it’s also extremely safe.

Most people will have enough protection from the vaccine that they shouldn’t be concerned about the worst possible outcomes of the virus. Most. Maybe my perspective comes in part from having a close family member on chemo, although I think many of us here are similarly affected by that issue. I’d love the comfort of being able to say his vaccine makes potential exposure to the virus a non-issue, but that may not be the case. So I have just that much less patience for people who push the “your vaccine covers you so don’t worry about me” line, and that much more respect & gratitude for those who see it as a protection for others as well as themselves.

I don’t know who you think is “manipulating the population” & to what end. There’s a real disease. There’s a real vaccine. It works, it’s safe, and I fail to see how getting it makes a person more vulnerable to whatever mysterious & nefarious plot is being hatched- though that’s exactly what I would say if I were implanted with Anthony Fauci’s secret mind-control syrum.
Old 07-15-2021 | 04:13 PM
  #383  
MOGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200; FO
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
In countering the argument you think I’m making, you’re half making my point. We both agree the vaccine is highly effective. If you looked at all data with that same objectivity you’d see it’s also extremely safe.

Most people will have enough protection from the vaccine that they shouldn’t be concerned about the worst possible outcomes of the virus. Most. Maybe my perspective comes in part from having a close family member on chemo, although I think many of us here are similarly affected by that issue. I’d love the comfort of being able to say his vaccine makes potential exposure to the virus a non-issue, but that may not be the case. So I have just that much less patience for people who push the “your vaccine covers you so don’t worry about me” line, and that much more respect & gratitude for those who see it as a protection for others as well as themselves.

I don’t know who you think is “manipulating the population” & to what end. There’s a real disease. There’s a real vaccine. It works, it’s safe, and I fail to see how getting it makes a person more vulnerable to whatever mysterious & nefarious plot is being hatched- though that’s exactly what I would say if I were implanted with Anthony Fauci’s secret mind-control syrum.
As far as we know. There have been many immunologist as well as virologist and the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a branch of NIH, who have warned about the potentional for long term impacts and induced immunogen expression and development of auto reactive antibodies. As far as I gather this is equivalent or is autoimmune disease.

Not sure why the vaxxers are so hard on those not wanting a non FDA approved vaccine. I for one don't care if you want and I have no opinion on your choice as you shouldn't mine.
​​​​​​
Old 07-15-2021 | 06:20 PM
  #384  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy
Not sure why the vaxxers are so hard on those not wanting a non FDA approved vaccine. I for one don't care if you want and I have no opinion on your choice as you shouldn't mine.
​​​​​​
I care a lot less about a person who chooses not to get vaccinated than one who actively goes around spreading misinformation and baseless claims about death & altered DNA, and weird fear porn about subjugation & government control. Surely you can appreciate the hypocrisy in a person who preaches “let people decide for themselves” while injecting all sorts of false information into the conversation.
Old 07-15-2021 | 06:48 PM
  #385  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 283
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by jtbost
Man you can’t argue with an anti vax conspiracy theorists! You know that. Who cares precisely how many died and continue to die from COVID. It’s a big number no matter how you count them. Any healthy person that refuses this shot is off their proverbial rocker. Enough said.
Gulf Foxtrot Yankee.
Old 07-15-2021 | 08:02 PM
  #386  
flightmedic01's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Reclining
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
I care a lot less about a person who chooses not to get vaccinated than one who actively goes around spreading misinformation and baseless claims about death & altered DNA, and weird fear porn about subjugation & government control. Surely you can appreciate the hypocrisy in a person who preaches “let people decide for themselves” while injecting all sorts of false information into the conversation.
When you say spreading “misinformation”, I would like to know who is determining what information is considered “factual” and what is not. Who is fact-checking the fact-checkers?? Most intelligent people are capable of doing their own research and can sniff out BS when they see it. NPR posted an article from the Surgeon General (Dr. Vivek Murthy) stating that COVID “misinformation” is costing lives. According to the article, it states: “In his advisory, he puts pressure on big tech companies to play a bigger role in combating health misinformation on their platforms. He wants to see algorithms tweaked to further demote bad information and companies to share more data with outside researchers and the government.”

“Combating health misinformation???” So anything that doesn’t align with the current COVID narrative will be censored. Meaning, you will only hear what we want you to hear. That should raise the hairs on everyone’s necks.
Old 07-16-2021 | 05:54 AM
  #387  
MOGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200; FO
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
I care a lot less about a person who chooses not to get vaccinated than one who actively goes around spreading misinformation and baseless claims about death & altered DNA, and weird fear porn about subjugation & government control. Surely you can appreciate the hypocrisy in a person who preaches “let people decide for themselves” while injecting all sorts of false information into the conversation.

​​​​​​Nothing I posted is "misinformation". The concerns came directly from the NIH. There's probably a reason the FDA has not approved this other than EAU.
Old 07-16-2021 | 06:25 AM
  #388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jtbost
Best of luck to you. Hopefully the unvaccinated youth today don’t end up killing their Grandparents.
One of the most ignorant statements I have heard lately.
Old 07-16-2021 | 06:33 AM
  #389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy
​​​​​​Nothing I posted is "misinformation". The concerns came directly from the NIH. There's probably a reason the FDA has not approved this other than EAU.
It’s saying that you read an article from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and claiming it was “from” the NIH that is misinformation. It’s a database of articles essentially. It’s akin to saying your town are Nazis because the library has a copy of Mein Kompf.
Old 07-16-2021 | 06:33 AM
  #390  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy
​​​​​​Nothing I posted is "misinformation". The concerns came directly from the NIH. There's probably a reason the FDA has not approved this other than EAU.

or there’s a a specific timeline and data required. What you fail to realize that absent these vaccines 1000’s of pilots would be furloughed currently.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fortyeight
Republic Airways
203
09-23-2018 06:28 PM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
49
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices