Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
IRO Landing Currency - TA >

IRO Landing Currency - TA

Search

Notices

IRO Landing Currency - TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2022 | 05:51 PM
  #11  
5spot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Up7997
I guarantee most flying pilots will be praying for an iro that needs a landing to grab the add pay. I personally have no problem going every 3 months as it’s a nice refresher and more beneficial then getting 3 landings in the real world. I most likely won’t want the landing and now I’m the bad guy before the trip even starts.
BS, just bid the bunkie if you are senior enough to hold the flying position and hate to fly. This is complete crap and just another example of how out of touch our Union has become.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 06:03 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 122
Default

Originally Posted by 5spot
BS, just bid the bunkie if you are senior enough to hold the flying position and hate to fly. This is complete crap and just another example of how out of touch our Union has become.
It’s not about hating to fly, it’s about bidding the best trip in your seniority. I’d much rather bid IRO on a 25 hr double augmented NRT 3 day than a 19 hr flying seat to LHR. The super productive trips go senior and most can’t hold a flying seat on those routes. A 9 day IRO line beats the hell out of a 12 day flying seat line any day. Under the TA if you opt out of the landings swap and have to go to landings class, you don’t get paid. This thing is garbage on every fleet, yet it will probably pass.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 06:10 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
It’s not about hating to fly, it’s about bidding the best trip in your seniority. I’d much rather bid IRO on a 25 hr double augmented NRT 3 day than a 19 hr flying seat to LHR. The super productive trips go senior and most can’t hold a flying seat on those routes. A 9 day IRO line beats the hell out of a 12 day flying seat line any day. Under the TA if you opt out of the landings swap and have to go to landings class, you don’t get paid. This thing is garbage on every fleet, yet it will probably pass.
Could you do 10 days a month? Two NRT bunkies and a LHR flying?
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 06:29 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 122
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Could you do 10 days a month? Two NRT bunkies and a LHR flying?
If you had the seniority. I’d rather just do the 3 NRT’s. I don’t care about flying airplanes, I just care about getting paid. The IRO seat was actually easier on my body clock too. 4 pilots and a 6 hour paid nap was a pretty good gig.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 06:38 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
It’s not about hating to fly, it’s about bidding the best trip in your seniority. I’d much rather bid IRO on a 25 hr double augmented NRT 3 day than a 19 hr flying seat to LHR. The super productive trips go senior and most can’t hold a flying seat on those routes. A 9 day IRO line beats the hell out of a 12 day flying seat line any day. Under the TA if you opt out of the landings swap and have to go to landings class, you don’t get paid. This thing is garbage on every fleet, yet it will probably pass.
Well stated. I’d rather do a 30 hour trip as an IRO than a 16 hour trip as a flying pilot. And if that means landings every 90 days that’s what my seniority allows.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 07:58 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Could you do 10 days a month? Two NRT bunkies and a LHR flying?
6-7 years ago (DCA777FO), the IAD-NRT bunkie was the senior trip in the category. Many folks doing that had 777CA seniority easily. But the bunkie was a 3 day trip. They only had to do three a month and it was double augmented. The flying seat was a 7 day trip and the most junior trip on the fleet.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 08:16 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Default

This is really about freeing up sims. Sim time is so valuable now it's probably worth it for the company to FBO the flying FO and pay the IRO for a reassignment 3 times before taking down a sim for landings. This $500 deal is for kids. Also, an LHR landing is probably worth $500 to an EWR senior FO who lands 6 times per month. If you're getting 3 landings per month then it's worth $1000, no? But let's not forget this thing is worth several times that to the company to free up a sim+instructor slot.
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 11:49 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Default

How does it work now for pilots who only bid IRO? Every 90 days you get a paid trip to TK for landing sims on days off?
Reply
Old 06-25-2022 | 11:56 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 4
From: MD-88 FO
Default

Is bidding for the flying seat a company preference or a pilot preference? That might be a nice change. When i show up the captain just asks who needs landings or who expires soonest. Being able to bid for or not bid for landings is nice.
Reply
Old 06-26-2022 | 04:03 AM
  #20  
5spot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
It’s not about hating to fly, it’s about bidding the best trip in your seniority. I’d much rather bid IRO on a 25 hr double augmented NRT 3 day than a 19 hr flying seat to LHR. The super productive trips go senior and most can’t hold a flying seat on those routes. A 9 day IRO line beats the hell out of a 12 day flying seat line any day. Under the TA if you opt out of the landings swap and have to go to landings class, you don’t get paid. This thing is garbage on every fleet, yet it will probably pass.
Thats great that you can use your seniority to be a bunkie but if I want to bid to fly and I choose not to opt in, then I am risking the possibility of going NQ for 60 days with no pay. Of course that could NEVER happen right? Sickness, family emergency etc would never cause me to miss a trip and go NQ. My point is this is a complete BS inclusion in this TA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
metro-mia
Technical
11
04-24-2019 05:52 AM
IFLY22
Aviation Law
10
10-26-2011 01:43 PM
Mattio
Aviation Law
3
11-08-2010 08:37 PM
USMC3197
Aviation Law
15
09-25-2008 06:11 PM
Gordon C
JetBlue
5
10-06-2005 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices