Search

Notices

Tumi 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2022 | 03:32 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Default

Is a poll reasonable to open on here? Listing priorities for what the pilot group wants/needs? …or is that negotiating in public…?
Reply
Old 12-09-2022 | 03:43 PM
  #42  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by RaginCajun
Is a poll reasonable to open on here? Listing priorities for what the pilot group wants/needs? …or is that negotiating in public…?
it’s as pointless as another survey. Yes/No doesn’t cut it.

someone on here said it best about the previous worthless surveys.

do you want us to cut off your right arm or your left?

neither why can’t I say neither??

rank in order of importance to you: all 1s they are all 1s why do I have to pick an 8?
Reply
Old 12-09-2022 | 06:12 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
it’s as pointless as another survey. Yes/No doesn’t cut it.

someone on here said it best about the previous worthless surveys.

do you want us to cut off your right arm or your left?

neither why can’t I say neither??

rank in order of importance to you: all 1s they are all 1s why do I have to pick an 8?
I agree they are all important. It's a fact that we don't know what we don't know. Things could be on the table and worth the ask that we haven't even considered. Like the FDX/UPS min day guarantee (flying or not) of 6 hrs. Those 30-74 hr layovers would go pretty senior.

I'm just saying that there is way more to the pie than we realize. Delta +1 is easy street and almost a given at this point. It's time for some real change to blow this new TA to new heights.
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 05:02 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 668
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RaginCajun
I agree they are all important. It's a fact that we don't know what we don't know. Things could be on the table and worth the ask that we haven't even considered. Like the FDX/UPS min day guarantee (flying or not) of 6 hrs. Those 30-74 hr layovers would go pretty senior.

I'm just saying that there is way more to the pie than we realize. Delta +1 is easy street and almost a given at this point. It's time for some real change to blow this new TA to new heights.
United doesn’t pay min day for days you don’t fly on long layovers? That’s absurd… even regionals do for the rare 30 hour overnights or holidays where you don’t fly
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 05:24 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by saltbae
United doesn’t pay min day for days you don’t fly on long layovers? That’s absurd… even regionals do for the rare 30 hour overnights or holidays where you don’t fly
Nope. Pre-flight/boarding pay should also be a thing. Our NC is out of chances to make this industry leading. Read the DAL AIP language…and make it happen. We simply do not have the luxury to delay any longer.
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 05:27 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 668
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RaginCajun
Nope. Pre-flight/boarding pay should also be a thing. Our NC is out of chances to make this industry leading. Read the DAL AIP language…and make it happen. We simply do not have the luxury to delay any longer.
Just Copy Paste.. clearly it’s realistic since DAL is doing it, no excuse for UAL management not to unless they admit to being inferior to a rival

Love UA flying but wow, terrible contract. I’ll take QOL over new jets/widebody flying. This is really going to hurt hiring unless you all get a competitive contract.
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 06:16 AM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 740
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by saltbae
United doesn’t pay min day for days you don’t fly on long layovers? That’s absurd… even regionals do for the rare 30 hour overnights or holidays where you don’t fly
Called trip rigs.
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 07:13 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
Called trip rigs.
those inadequate ones that only look at total TAFB? A min daily guarantee would be very good for those 30+ hour layovers.
Reply
Old 12-12-2022 | 01:04 PM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 740
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
those inadequate ones that only look at total TAFB? A min daily guarantee would be very good for those 30+ hour layovers.
A 3:1 trip rig would be way better all around.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 09:32 PM
  #50  
jetjock257's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
We just keep recycling these super old/senior people. People get thrown out and names from the past come back to life. They all need to go. I don't care if everybody in the union has been here less then 5 years. For some many years all we heard was how great UAL ALPA was. It's been nothing but a joke for a long time.
Wait 'till you see who the new Master Chairman is! Think dried out turd that just keeps floating around the internet punchbowl. OMG this is going to be fun to watch. LOL 😆
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlettaOcean
United
92
07-12-2022 10:17 AM
TheFoose
United
11
07-14-2021 11:40 AM
AmericanEagleFO
Hangar Talk
4
06-18-2009 04:24 AM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
4
03-21-2009 09:42 AM
jzuniga
Cargo
9
06-24-2008 01:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices