Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
DEI=Racism thread moved or pulled? >

DEI=Racism thread moved or pulled?

Search

Notices

DEI=Racism thread moved or pulled?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2023 | 11:40 AM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

CommutAir 4933, Atlas 3591, UPS 1354.

Ever wonder why some pilots are allowed to fly after multiple training issues? Or, why some pilots are hired even after they’ve failed multiple check rides?

Why pilots with perfect records were bypassed for hiring and those with significant deficits were hired in a safety sensitive profession?

The above are just three examples, but I think it is reasonable to question what has driven the hiring of airline pilots in the past.

Subjectively, a pilots training record is the number 1 correlation to determine the success of that pilot in the future. It’s a more significant correlate than criminality and DUI.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 11:47 AM
  #132  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Barley
I’ve flown with numerous retired military pilots with unbelievably weak piloting skills and decision-making. Should we stop veteran’s preference for job applications too…..
Yes.
As for the DEI discussion…..I had a lot more heartburn over the issue when it was HARD to get an interview, and “diversity hires” were getting hired fro, the right seat. Now that it doesn’t hinder me in any way, I have no issue with DEI adjusting the standards for HIRING. Adjusting the standards for TRAINING and EVALUATION is completely unacceptable. As long as that doesn’t occur….there’s no reason to think a low time hire can’t hone the skills and procedures in the training environment. We need diversity…but we also need unity AMONGST that diversity. Having cliques of different demographics doesn’t help the cause. Not at the airline….not in this country.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 11:51 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
Yes.
As for the DEI discussion…..I had a lot more heartburn over the issue when it was HARD to get an interview, and “diversity hires” were getting hired fro, the right seat. Now that it doesn’t hinder me in any way, I have no issue with DEI adjusting the standards for HIRING. Adjusting the standards for TRAINING and EVALUATION is completely unacceptable. As long as that doesn’t occur….there’s no reason to think a low time hire can’t hone the skills and procedures in the training environment. We need diversity…but we also need unity AMONGST that diversity. Having cliques of different demographics doesn’t help the cause. Not at the airline….not in this country.
It’s illegal to adjust hiring standards based on a protected class.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 11:55 AM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by Barley
I’ve flown with numerous retired military pilots with unbelievably weak piloting skills and decision-making. Should we stop veteran’s preference for job applications too since that elevates a lot of “unqualified” people to a newhire class?

gmafb.. this thread is just a disgrace and nothing more than the Tucker & Pals addicted forever victims throwing one fit after another.

APC used to be useful, but this is nothing more than a safe haven for the most ignorant among us.

mods, feel free to delete my account. There’s nothing of use in this echo chamber of crybabies. Such an embarrassment to the profession.
Veteran’s preference doesn’t apply to civilian jobs. Only federal.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 11:57 AM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
Veteran’s preference doesn’t apply to civilian jobs. Only federal.
Since when were Delta & FEDEX “federal jobs”?
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 12:04 PM
  #136  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
CommutAir 4933, Atlas 3591, UPS 1354.

Ever wonder why some pilots are allowed to fly after multiple training issues? Or, why some pilots are hired even after they’ve failed multiple check rides?

Why pilots with perfect records were bypassed for hiring and those with significant deficits were hired in a safety sensitive profession?

The above are just three examples, but I think it is reasonable to question what has driven the hiring of airline pilots in the past.

Subjectively, a pilots training record is the number 1 correlation to determine the success of that pilot in the future. It’s a more significant correlate than criminality and DUI.
Eastern Air Lines Flight 401
Northwest Airlines Flight 255
Delta Air Lines Flight 1141
PSA Flight 2495
AA Flight 1420


It’s obvious pilots pilots of non minority/male status have also have their share crashes and mishaps with perfect records right…..

Atlas 3591 was a breakdown in the PRIA system and a carrier at the time desperate for bodies in the flight deck at the time and no body in the training department speaking up washing the guy out…..

But if you want to point crashes that involves folks of non-minority/ or male status. The numbers will not support your stance…..

Mods, this thread needs to die….

Last edited by Swakid8; 02-22-2023 at 12:20 PM.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 12:07 PM
  #137  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
It is not bad. It’s good.

Having different standards is bad. Removing standards for political and ideological motivations is bad. Ignoring HR, personal and safety issues in hiring of pilots and air traffic controllers is bad.

This has been going on for decades. The flavor and color of the preferred candidates changes, but the bias, nepotism, blatant bigotry and favoritism does not. It’s packaged as “Good Leads the Way”, but it is the exact opposite.

You say 93% of pilots are white males. In NTSB reportable accidents and incidents, what percentage of pilots involved are white males? Take a guess? It’s much less than 93%, because standards were reduced to fulfill ideological goals. Employees and customers are expendable because of political ideology.

The desire for “diversity” exceeds the supply of adequate candidates. So, standards are reduced until the diversity goals are achieved. This probably leads to more preventable incidents and accidents, HR problems, etc., but airlines have made the decision that this is the cost of doing business, this is OK.

DEI has some negative consequences. These issues should be addressed before there is needless injury and death.
This is the dumbest comment ever. Standards are the same for everyone, and everyone is equally capable of crashing a plane.

I agree nepotism at United is bad though. If you have family in the company, you are granted a seat in, when off the street people have to go through the hoops. its totally unfair.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 12:09 PM
  #138  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
CommutAir 4933, Atlas 3591, UPS 1354.

Ever wonder why some pilots are allowed to fly after multiple training issues? Or, why some pilots are hired even after they’ve failed multiple check rides?

Why pilots with perfect records were bypassed for hiring and those with significant deficits were hired in a safety sensitive profession?

The above are just three examples, but I think it is reasonable to question what has driven the hiring of airline pilots in the past.

Subjectively, a pilots training record is the number 1 correlation to determine the success of that pilot in the future. It’s a more significant correlate than criminality and DUI.
For everyone one crash you say was done by a minority, I can pull up 10 crashes on wikipedia done by non-minotiry. Nice propaganda.

Anyway, in the atlas crash, why was the captain who was white and had no training issues, sitting 2 feet away from the PF, allowed it to happen?
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 12:31 PM
  #139  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

The Captain in the Atlas crash DID try to stop it. I’m pretty sure the control column was damaged from his efforts, if memory serves.

This thread is not only damaging to the POSITIVE ideals behind DEI….but it’s also a major career mistake to think your username isn’t known. I was about to BLAST a former colleague of mine who currently works here…..then I was like….nah. I actually like my job.
Reply
Old 02-22-2023 | 12:39 PM
  #140  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
CommutAir 4933, Atlas 3591, UPS 1354.

Ever wonder why some pilots are allowed to fly after multiple training issues? Or, why some pilots are hired even after they’ve failed multiple check rides?

Why pilots with perfect records were bypassed for hiring and those with significant deficits were hired in a safety sensitive profession?

The above are just three examples, but I think it is reasonable to question what has driven the hiring of airline pilots in the past.

Subjectively, a pilots training record is the number 1 correlation to determine the success of that pilot in the future. It’s a more significant correlate than criminality and DUI.
I noticed that you didn’t provide any actual statistical data to backup your previous claim but instead cherry picked a few accidents to support your bogus theory. Fact of the matter is, I could list hoards of accidents involving flight crews that looked good on paper and yet they still managed to put an airplane into the ground.

No race or gender has a monopoly on flight safety. No race or gender is inherently unsafe. We’ve all had our share of bad apples.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2StgTurbine
Part 135
410
10-12-2020 12:11 PM
Pelican
Alaska
820
11-27-2016 04:11 PM
C17MooseDriver
Hangar Talk
10
03-03-2011 09:21 AM
757Driver
Major
0
10-13-2010 01:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices