Age 67
#591
Banned
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
Safety? Again, the high risk group is 50-60 due to the elevated coronary events in that age group.
Look at page 19 of the slide deck that Togathrust posted: https://www.icao.int/safety/aviation...%20Study_c.pdf
The risk declines after 60.
If this were truly about safety, ALPA would be pushing for a retirement age of 50.
Look at page 19 of the slide deck that Togathrust posted: https://www.icao.int/safety/aviation...%20Study_c.pdf
The risk declines after 60.
If this were truly about safety, ALPA would be pushing for a retirement age of 50.
#592
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Also much harder to identify. Especially when recurrent events are shared with the whole group hours or days after they go live. Hardly a rigorous test of one’s mental faculties when you can memorize the whole thing ahead of time.
#593
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
Believe me I remember it, with a stroke of a pen 300 over age sixty engineers moved back to the left seat. Then add on no retirements for five years and a totally crap economy thrown in the mix.
Lost my WB captain bid and got an extra five years as an FO.
So yes I remember.
So a two year extension in the largest hiring boom ever in airline history is going to make this practically a non event.
I know you are going to say you got stuck at a regional longer. Probably a better deal than in 1993 when I got out of the military and me and most of my friends were either unemployed or working some crap job. So yes everybody has it tough every once and a while.
You want me to cry for you go live in the slums of Mumbai, you got nothing to cry about.
Lost my WB captain bid and got an extra five years as an FO.
So yes I remember.
So a two year extension in the largest hiring boom ever in airline history is going to make this practically a non event.
I know you are going to say you got stuck at a regional longer. Probably a better deal than in 1993 when I got out of the military and me and most of my friends were either unemployed or working some crap job. So yes everybody has it tough every once and a while.
You want me to cry for you go live in the slums of Mumbai, you got nothing to cry about.
#594
Banned
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
Believe me I remember it, with a stroke of a pen 300 over age sixty engineers moved back to the left seat. Then add on no retirements for five years and a totally crap economy thrown in the mix.
Lost my WB captain bid and got an extra five years as an FO.
So yes I remember.
So a two year extension in the largest hiring boom ever in airline history is going to make this practically a non event.
I know you are going to say you got stuck at a regional longer. Probably a better deal than in 1993 when I got out of the military and me and most of my friends were either unemployed or working some crap job. So yes everybody has it tough every once and a while.
You want me to cry for you go live in the slums of Mumbai, you got nothing to cry about.
Lost my WB captain bid and got an extra five years as an FO.
So yes I remember.
So a two year extension in the largest hiring boom ever in airline history is going to make this practically a non event.
I know you are going to say you got stuck at a regional longer. Probably a better deal than in 1993 when I got out of the military and me and most of my friends were either unemployed or working some crap job. So yes everybody has it tough every once and a while.
You want me to cry for you go live in the slums of Mumbai, you got nothing to cry about.
And I promise I won't use my bad times as an excuse to treat the next generation poorly when it's my turn.
#595
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
Your anger is misdirected. The ones that are pushing this are the politicians and a few pilots. The few pilots are not influencing age 67 change. It is the public crying about lost or poor service which the airline management blames on a lack of pilots.
So the politicians can look like they are actually helping out the public and keeping some pilits off SS a few more years.
Calling senior pilots gramps or saying they need to work more because of ex wives, boats or planes or poor planning is not going to get you anywhere.
So the politicians can look like they are actually helping out the public and keeping some pilits off SS a few more years.
Calling senior pilots gramps or saying they need to work more because of ex wives, boats or planes or poor planning is not going to get you anywhere.
#596
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Your anger is misdirected. The ones that are pushing this are the politicians and a few pilots. The few pilots are not influencing age 67 change. It is the public crying about lost or poor service which the airline management blames on a lack of pilots.
So the politicians can look like they are actually helping out the public and keeping some pilits off SS a few more years.
Calling senior pilots gramps or saying they need to work more because of ex wives, boats or planes or poor planning is not going to get you anywhere.
So the politicians can look like they are actually helping out the public and keeping some pilits off SS a few more years.
Calling senior pilots gramps or saying they need to work more because of ex wives, boats or planes or poor planning is not going to get you anywhere.
I have made no effort to contact my representatives either in favor or against age 67. I have done nothing to support or oppose an age change. That doesn't matter; my problem is that like you, I'm just telling everyone the extremely likely outcome which is that the retirement age will change to 67.
They'll use the safety/science argument, but now that I've pointed out the elevated coronary risk of 50-60 year olds - you know, science - they focus on cognitive decline. Never mind that anyone who's studied cognitive decline would know that there's no inexpensive or reliable way to determine cognitive decline. No science, but that doesn't matter to them. Because we're all selfish pricks arguing for what will benefit us.
To be clear for everyone, I'm not arguing for or against an age change; I'm agnostic on hte subject. I am simply stating the obvious on the sugject.
#597
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
I am following the group think, problem is the group is yelling at the clouds. Just because the name of the amendment is called the experienced pilots act doesn’t mean it has anything to do with the name. It should really be called the politicians trying to fix something that they don’t have a clue about but we are going to do something so we can say we are looking out for our constituents so we can get re elected against bill!
#598
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
I am following the group think, problem is the group is yelling at the clouds. Just because the name of the amendment is called the experienced pilots act doesn’t mean it has anything to do with the name. It should really be called the politicians trying to fix something that they don’t have a clue about but we are going to do something so we can say we are looking out for our constituents so we can get re elected against bill!
#599
I flew with several of his flavor of lying prick before I got chopped in ‘09. They knew my status, so of course they all said they were going out at 60 regardless….and were going to travel around the country in an RV….yada, yada……..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



