Search

Notices

American has an AIP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2023 | 03:58 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Default

With all the talk of financially incentivizing the crap no one wants, I offer this would increase QOL for NB pilots fairly significantly.

1) If a weekend trip touches a SAT or SUN, make that trip on those days M6.5, but only M5 for credit.
So in essence, any weekend trip Fri-SUN would have a minimum of a 23 hr pay. 5,6.5,6.5,5. That a min, and most I'm guessing would pay more.

OK, you might say that would incentivize the company to either 1, build more trips that don't cover the weekend, or 2, make weekend trips more productive. Isn't that what we want?
A senior bidder always has the option to go after the $$ (more money, maybe less work and more soft time if company builds trips this way) or if they want the days off they choose.
This would in essence incentivize less weekend trips (just like holiday pay will incentivize less pilots working on holidays) for both the company builder and perhaps get the more senior guys who don't care and would rather get the soft time or an easy weekend trip, one that pays 23, but only work 19-20 hrs. I used to see a lot more 25-26 hr 4 day pairing, not so much anymore.

2) The M6.5D on SAT/SUN would not pay if you call in sick. You still get the M5D for SAT/SUN and it only removes sick call based on the actual current book rig, not including the weekend bonus. So this disincentives guys to call in sick on the weekend (we know they will anyway), but also incentivizes guys to pick up those pairings that might go to a Jr bidder too. This would also help reserve coverage on weekends. The company could add this M6.5D qualifier if they see a nor'easter coming or other weather event which would also disincentivize those pilots from calling in sick also using less reserves for those events. This might also incentivize more trip trading since now a weekend trip that today is undesirable, might actually be a good trip trade if someone decided they have no plans for the weekend and would rather make a couple extra $$.

You might argue then premium pay will be less. Yes, it probably will be less for those ultra senior guys that get it all here at United. Let's be honest and say that right now, our premium pay system goes to 2 types of pilots, ones that are super senior, or those that are constantly hustling in crew companion and made trading or dropping to 0 a 2nd job. Senior guys still have those options of bidding for weekend trips that pay a min of 23 hrs and like to pick up that soft time, which sometimes is harder to get.
Reply
Old 05-23-2023 | 04:10 PM
  #132  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 934
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
There will be less reserves available for SC & FSB. That is a given. Whether people would pick up PPU that would exist on a short notice as a result is a guess.
different company but swa has short notice open time and trips get taken pretty quick
Reply
Old 05-23-2023 | 05:35 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by KnightNight
different company but swa has short notice open time and trips get taken pretty quick

I realize that, but just look at the current operation with the current book. If you're getting reassigned from a normal pairing, they've run through the wickets already and had no takers for SRM or PPU. That's with our liberal reserve policy in place. If we don't make other improvements in the reassignment language, but drastically reduce the amount of SCs & FSBs available, you'd see a big uptick in reassignments. We'd be looking DL, AA or SWA in that regard without those protections in place. I'm hoping that the union has the sense to see that. The company sure does.
Reply
Old 05-24-2023 | 05:16 AM
  #134  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Yup. All of those things could actually be good with choice and pay.

FSB lines actually went senior at my last airline because you usually credited in the mid 90’s. No one got forced into them. Many locals were happy to spend most nights at home and make an extra 20 hours of pay to just have to sit at the airport for a few hours.

Make getting rolled into days off opt in the month prior then bump up min days off by one or two for those that opt in, and make lost days pay 100%. I guarantee there are enough money hounds out there it would barely affect the company’s ability to bounce back after irops or general flexibility while greatly increasing QOL for those of us that just want to be at home on the days we bid off.
see yes if it’s voluntary and some pilots may choose to do it for extra compensation especially if it isn’t a big inconvenience for them. But I doubt it’ll become voluntary. My post was meant to say they aren’t improving qol they are simply going to throw more money at the issue to shut people up.

there plenty of ways to earn extra income at other airlines voluntarily for those that want more work. So keeping items that are inherently bad for qol and simply paying more for them isn’t a win.
Reply
Old 05-24-2023 | 06:54 AM
  #135  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by LJ Driver
If done properly this is actually best case for us. Why not offer add pay for these items most of us hate? Some people will be more than happy to sit at an airport for 4 hours or slide their day off if they are getting paid something decent for it. It appears that FDOs are already gone for Global anyway, I’m guessing basic reserve could be next.
that is essentially the ALPA proposal. CompAny doesn’t like it
Reply
Old 05-25-2023 | 05:36 AM
  #136  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by dailyops
Besides first class deadheads, what exactly in our current UPA or our asks for our future UPA exceed delta? I haven't seen anything.
crew meals.
Reply
Old 05-25-2023 | 07:07 AM
  #137  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie
With all the talk of financially incentivizing the crap no one wants, I offer this would increase QOL for NB pilots fairly significantly.

1) If a weekend trip touches a SAT or SUN, make that trip on those days M6.5, but only M5 for credit.
So in essence, any weekend trip Fri-SUN would have a minimum of a 23 hr pay. 5,6.5,6.5,5. That a min, and most I'm guessing would pay more.

OK, you might say that would incentivize the company to either 1, build more trips that don't cover the weekend, or 2, make weekend trips more productive. Isn't that what we want?
A senior bidder always has the option to go after the $$ (more money, maybe less work and more soft time if company builds trips this way) or if they want the days off they choose.
This would in essence incentivize less weekend trips (just like holiday pay will incentivize less pilots working on holidays) for both the company builder and perhaps get the more senior guys who don't care and would rather get the soft time or an easy weekend trip, one that pays 23, but only work 19-20 hrs. I used to see a lot more 25-26 hr 4 day pairing, not so much anymore.

2) The M6.5D on SAT/SUN would not pay if you call in sick. You still get the M5D for SAT/SUN and it only removes sick call based on the actual current book rig, not including the weekend bonus. So this disincentives guys to call in sick on the weekend (we know they will anyway), but also incentivizes guys to pick up those pairings that might go to a Jr bidder too. This would also help reserve coverage on weekends. The company could add this M6.5D qualifier if they see a nor'easter coming or other weather event which would also disincentivize those pilots from calling in sick also using less reserves for those events. This might also incentivize more trip trading since now a weekend trip that today is undesirable, might actually be a good trip trade if someone decided they have no plans for the weekend and would rather make a couple extra $$.

You might argue then premium pay will be less. Yes, it probably will be less for those ultra senior guys that get it all here at United. Let's be honest and say that right now, our premium pay system goes to 2 types of pilots, ones that are super senior, or those that are constantly hustling in crew companion and made trading or dropping to 0 a 2nd job. Senior guys still have those options of bidding for weekend trips that pay a min of 23 hrs and like to pick up that soft time, which sometimes is harder to get.

pilots on LHR layovers should get paid for the van ride to and from the hotel.
Reply
Old 05-25-2023 | 06:04 PM
  #138  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
pilots on LHR layovers should get paid for the van ride to and from the hotel.
EDV pilots have customs pay, not much but just another thing regional contracts have that UAL is behind on.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotCrusader
Regional
24
02-25-2015 04:37 AM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
53
02-03-2014 10:02 AM
JonnyKnoxville
American
11
10-10-2012 11:00 PM
SoCalGuy
United
330
08-18-2012 05:09 PM
AirbusA320
American
112
02-01-2012 07:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices