Search

Notices

8-F-12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2023 | 04:26 AM
  #51  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by 744ButtonPusher
no you would not be able to bid an FO position, freezes are now effective at award (not training start)
that’s the way I understand it also… locked for 2 years.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 04:33 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
that’s the way I understand it also… locked for 2 years.
So if someone comes in from mil or 135 without 121 experience (happening now) they could be frozen into an asap nbca bid for 2 years while they get 1000 hours 121 time and then locked into that seat for another 2 years?
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 04:38 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
So if someone comes in from mil or 135 without 121 experience (happening now) they could be frozen into an asap nbca bid for 2 years while they get 1000 hours 121 time and then locked into that seat for another 2 years?
No, lock starts from award.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:08 AM
  #54  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Da40Pilot
This will not be implemented until Fall of '24 anyway - if you look at the implementation schedule, lots of things will happen before we start doing this. This gives everyone who is planning on applying to United the understanding that, and especially if they are young, they may get a CA award right out of training. If they still choose to apply and take a class date at United, they are well aware they may become accelerated pilots. Free will and choice is abundant here. Nobody is forcing people to apply to United, especially if they don't want to upgrade or have no prior PIC experience at a regional (which we are starting to see now). If we end up having applicants play Russian roulette with their first year here, knowing full well there was a chance they could be given a CA slot, then that's on them - nobody forced them to apply.
Sounds like B scale mentality. “We’ll make things worse for the incoming pilots but it’s fine because it won’t hurt anyone currently on property & all the new guys will know what they’re getting themselves into.” Awesome.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:27 AM
  #55  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Sounds like B scale mentality. “We’ll make things worse for the incoming pilots but it’s fine because it won’t hurt anyone currently on property & all the new guys will know what they’re getting themselves into.” Awesome.
This specific provision in the contract won't hurt anyone on/off the property... prospective hires will know the "rules" before accepting the CJO... if they don't like the "rules" then don't accept and go elsewhere as everyone is hiring. I think the real thorn in the side of many of the pilots on property is they don't like the idea of having to fly with a much more junior pilot who will be making all the decisions... remedy for that (and company knows it) is to bid over to the left seat. Like I said on another thread... this issue of having captain vacancies after a bid is going to dry up during the next economic downturn... this "rule" is never going to be implemented on a wide scale because many on property won't be here as they will be furloughed and the more senior pilots will be pushed down to either lower paying seats or take the NB upgrade. Hate to be the pessimist but I've personally experienced this problem 3 times during my time here. The explosive growth we are forecasting is awesome while its happening... but history shows it will turn sour.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:30 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
So if someone comes in from mil or 135 without 121 experience (happening now) they could be frozen into an asap nbca bid for 2 years while they get 1000 hours 121 time and then locked into that seat for another 2 years?
the way I understand it, since this theoretical person got awarded CA during Indoc, if after training, and then building 1000 hours, and then going back through a full captain course took 2 years, you would never actually have to sit in the seat if you were able to bid something different in time.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:36 AM
  #57  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 134
Default

“New hire and probationary pilots will be subject to section 8-F-12”. Would this apply to probationary pilots currently on property or only those hired after ratification? And am I correct that probies aren’t eligible to vote?
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:37 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 399
Likes: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
the way I understand it, since this theoretical person got awarded CA during Indoc, if after training, and then building 1000 hours took 2 years, you would never actually have to sit in the seat.
1. To be assigned one of these captain spots at indoc, they must already meet 121 requirements to hold captain. It said it cannot be assigned unless they do.

2. While freeze is active from award, the length of the freeze is essentially variable based on what I am reading is an “imputed activation date” and is based on when the person meets the 350 hrs in type at UA requirement.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:39 AM
  #59  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Da40Pilot
Yes you could, as long as someone senior to you grabbed the CA upgrade slot you held in the subsequent vacancy bids. So, like you said, if you happen to be one of those people who gets awarded a CA position, you'll have at least 7-8 months (Training + 350 hours logged) to get someone to bump you off. Not sure how things will look end of '24 but - lots of opportunities to stay an FO if you truly wanted it.
If I’m reading 8-D-1-a-(3)-(a) correctly, forced upgrade “buy backs” are at the bottom of the priority list- not the top. So it only happens once all vacancies on a subsequent bid are filled and there are still senior pilots bidding upgrade over & beyond what was offered. The likelihood of one vacancy having unfilled CA seats, & then a sudden rush for the door a month later is not high, so I wouldn’t expect it to be common practice. Brickfire is right- this is designed to fill seats, not produce a revolving door.
Reply
Old 09-02-2023 | 05:42 AM
  #60  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by calpilot69
I'd take a regional guy vs. a mil guy who's "traveled the globe". and smile on the TK bus.
yup. We don’t need to brief 400 miles from destination, and we don’t need to slow to 180kts 40 miles from TDZ….possum, or viper, or whoever you think you are.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices