Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
737 vs 320 for new hire and future progress >

737 vs 320 for new hire and future progress

Search

Notices

737 vs 320 for new hire and future progress

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2025 | 06:55 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Flap Operator
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default 737 vs 320 for new hire and future progress

Just researching but is the 737 or 320 fleet recommended for someone wanting to start at EWR and later move to CA in Denver at a later time (2-3 years later)? I know the 737 fleet is larger so makes me think that would be the route... pros and cons of each fleet?
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 07:14 AM
  #2  
khergan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 650
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by gearupdude
Just researching but is the 737 or 320 fleet recommended for someone wanting to start at EWR and later move to CA in Denver at a later time (2-3 years later)? I know the 737 fleet is larger so makes me think that would be the route... pros and cons of each fleet?
There are a lot more 737s so it will always have better seniority / movement in general unless you're trying to go to GUM / MCO / CLE.

The 320 will also start gaining Europe and Hawaii flying with the XLR so it's a reasonable assumption that it will get even more senior as people come off the 756 and jump on to the airbus if they want the longer haul flying.
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 892
Likes: 151
Default

Lot of discussion of this in past threads. neither is a BAD choice.

But it doesn't matter for the scenario you propose. You can upgrade from one fleet to another regardless of timeline. Even if you want to FO before captain the 2 year seatlock allows a lateral move prior to upgrade on your suggested timeline.
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 07:44 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 934
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by gearupdude
Just researching but is the 737 or 320 fleet recommended for someone wanting to start at EWR and later move to CA in Denver at a later time (2-3 years later)? I know the 737 fleet is larger so makes me think that would be the route... pros and cons of each fleet?
737 is almost always the answer, we have the most of it and the most in order. Typically people on NB go to Airbus when seniority allows it seems. I’d do 737- to WB to NB captain personally, add in maybe 756 if you’re in EWR for some good flying
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 08:32 AM
  #5  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by gearupdude
Just researching but is the 737 or 320 fleet recommended for someone wanting to start at EWR and later move to CA in Denver at a later time (2-3 years later)? I know the 737 fleet is larger so makes me think that would be the route... pros and cons of each fleet?
A 2-3 year upgrade in DEN may be a little unrealistic. In EWR maybe.
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
A 2-3 year upgrade in DEN may be a little unrealistic. In EWR maybe.
People said that a few years ago too and then suddenly guys with a year on property were getting it there and there a few 1 year 756 CAs elsewhere. You never know…
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 10:03 AM
  #7  
prex8390's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 6
Default

Guppy for sure. The 321s will continue to come online but there isn't much to address the 319/320s that will inevitably start to get parked soon.

Seemingly the several hundred MAXs we have on order are just that.
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 01:48 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 354
Default

Originally Posted by prex8390
Guppy for sure. The 321s will continue to come online but there isn't much to address the 319/320s that will inevitably start to get parked soon.

Seemingly the several hundred MAXs we have on order are just that.
There are over 250 Airbus on order, not counting options. That's more than enough to replace all the older A320s and A319s as well as the entire 757 fleet and have planes left over.

The 737 MAX 10s are being converted to MAX 9s for now. We just converted 48 MAX 10s to 9s just a few weeks ago which is why the new hire classes went from estimating 200 a month in November to 200 a month starting in September. The first 2 classes of September are already being filled. 60 in each class.
Reply
Old 08-24-2025 | 05:02 PM
  #9  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
People said that a few years ago too and then suddenly guys with a year on property were getting it there and there a few 1 year 756 CAs elsewhere. You never know…
Indeed, you never do know. But some of the improvements to the reserve rules that were agreed upon in UPA23 and now have been implemented have made it a lot easier for commuter FOs deal with the loss of seat seniority if they upgrade. Perhaps if we get a flood of new aircraft hitting near simultaneously upgrade opportunities will go back to where they were a few years ago, but I think it would take something like that.


I’d be perfectly happy to be wrong though😉
Reply
Old 08-25-2025 | 07:36 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 80
Default

We will see what the “huge” NBCA vacancy looks like in November, but they’ve (crew resources) already said it’s going to be the coasts (EWR and SFO). I’m guessing the vast majority will be 737
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Qr1979
Allegiant
639
08-14-2022 01:17 PM
fifidriver
American
84
03-08-2020 09:35 PM
svergin
United
140
06-09-2016 10:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices