Search

Notices

Scope and the JCBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2011 | 06:28 AM
  #141  
FIIGMO's Avatar
Sho me da money!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: B25, Left
Default

Originally Posted by flyingfarmer
I guess you assume SWA pilots will choose ALPA. I think they would stick with SWAPA, no national politics with competitors, scope, etc.; just what's best for SWA pilots. Seems like a no brainer!
I am not even sure where you got that from? We like SWA scope, having SWA in ATL will be good for DAL and great for DAL pilots. The entry into ATL by SWA and the massive problems with merging cultures and creating hostile pilot groups is a fact and an unfortunate consequence. DAL watches SWA deal with issues and competes head to head with SWA and reaps all the benefits. This is good for DAL pilots (SWAPA contract) can now be used as direct cost comparison and we can slowly chip away at recovering what we can of the profession. SWAPA please keep going!

Now Back to the thread.
Reply
Old 12-14-2011 | 08:35 AM
  #142  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Does anyone have a link comparing the current UAL and CAL pilot contracts? We know the pay rates, I want to see comparisons of work rules, vacation and sick leave accrual and how it is paid out. Also want to see how the paid moves compare. It helps to do a apples to apples comparison.
Reply
Old 12-14-2011 | 02:58 PM
  #143  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Does anyone have a link comparing the current UAL and CAL pilot contracts? We know the pay rates, I want to see comparisons of work rules, vacation and sick leave accrual and how it is paid out. Also want to see how the paid moves compare. It helps to do a apples to apples comparison.
Don't know one "comparing" them, but you can download both of them and compare them for yourself at a great little website called: airlinepilotcentral.com!
Reply
Old 12-14-2011 | 03:23 PM
  #144  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Actually I want one that is more than a paragraph long


Ah. I found it on the downloads section.
Reply
Old 03-26-2012 | 09:26 AM
  #145  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

They are playing the waiting game with UA pilots...wait long enough and they will accept anything. It is open for speculation how much of a role the UAL MEC chair sitting on the board has in this whole thing. A case could be made that he is acting in accord with his legal duties in doing what is best FOR THE COMPANY. Never forget that a Directorship is a Management Position...So, we have a Management person sittinig in charge of the MEC. A management person appointed by a small group of people-not voted on by the pilot group at large.

The proud tradition at UA is to mollify the widebody crews..."you will be senior some day", "would you rather have RJs or 747s?"...How many 747s did we get after ESOP? Look at the nature of the bankruptcy agreement...the narrowbody guys got the shaft again.

The Company is getting most of the benefits of the merger, takeover, whatever you want to call it. The pilot group is in a box thanks to the colmany's "good faith lawsuit" resulting in a multi-year "preliminary injunction." MEC?

The RJ issue is a foregone conclusion. In a recent issue of the ALPO magazine was a quote that we must also maks sure the Regional industry thrives. Why? Alpa has refused to defend scope clauses.

I say that the "theme from Shaft" should replace "Rahpsody in Blue"...because the Shaft is what UA pilots continue to get!
Reply
Old 04-02-2012 | 04:33 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

So what official stance of the JNC on scope or do we even know? I've heard many rumors anything above 70 seats is mainline flown and the number of 70 seaters is the issue to be determined.
Reply
Old 04-11-2012 | 05:23 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88
So what official stance of the JNC on scope or do we even know? I've heard many rumors anything above 70 seats is mainline flown and the number of 70 seaters is the issue to be determined.
recently I heard from a union guy on the CAL side that scope will remain the same (CAL)
Reply
Old 04-18-2012 | 06:20 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Does anyone have a link comparing the current UAL and CAL pilot contracts? We know the pay rates, I want to see comparisons of work rules, vacation and sick leave accrual and how it is paid out. Also want to see how the paid moves compare. It helps to do a apples to apples comparison.

It is hard to compare... I've done it, but the trouble is in the scheduling section. Read the CAL section and it says "to be inserted at a later date." They got theirs about 3 months after they voted on their TA. They got handed some bullet points, and the bullet points all turned out to be lies. Then, their union negotiators jumped ship to management and took their notes with them. Then the CAL pilots got a "sweeeet" scheduling section that gutted their work rules and gave them PBS.

After getting PBS (which is an absence mangement system) they find out it is not built to honor seniority. They beta tested it with mock bids for 3 months and not a single absence was loaded into the system. No vacation, no training, no sick leave, no military leave.

It was the ultimate bait and switch with the NC leaving the team and then going to play for the other side.

But....I digress..........so sorry.

Anyway... UAL work rules exist to trigger protections due to management stupidty in unproductive flying. CAL work rules exist to squeeze every single drop of blood out of the pilot and his family and so that when he is dead there will be no public viewing, just a creamation because none of us new hire buddies will recognize him after cramming 50 years of flying into a 30 year career.

CAL should be called "slave ship airlines."
Reply
Old 04-18-2012 | 06:24 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal
It is hard to compare... I've done it, but the trouble is in the scheduling section. Read the CAL section and it says "to be inserted at a later date." They got theirs about 3 months after they voted on their TA. They got handed some bullet points, and the bullet points all turned out to be lies. Then, their union negotiators jumped ship to management and took their notes with them. Then the CAL pilots got a "sweeeet" scheduling section that gutted their work rules and gave them PBS.

After getting PBS (which is an absence mangement system) they find out it is not built to honor seniority. They beta tested it with mock bids for 3 months and not a single absence was loaded into the system. No vacation, no training, no sick leave, no military leave.

It was the ultimate bait and switch with the NC leaving the team and then going to play for the other side.

But....I digress..........so sorry.

Anyway... UAL work rules exist to trigger protections due to management stupidty in unproductive flying. CAL work rules exist to squeeze every single drop of blood out of the pilot and his family and so that when he is dead there will be no public viewing, just a creamation because none of us new hire buddies will recognize him after cramming 50 years of flying into a 30 year career.

CAL should be called "slave ship airlines."
OK. You're confusing me now. I actually agree with most of this
Reply
Old 04-18-2012 | 06:37 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
OK. You're confusing me now. I actually agree with most of this

I actually know what I am talking about.

You might not like the truth sandwich on the JCBA stuff, but on Friday I have a six pack of your favorite beer that says I am right.

I will gift wrap it and FedEx it to you if I am wrong.

My bet....CAL MEC says "enough" and they go it alone.

I drink Shiner Bock or Abita Turbo Dog
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices