Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   CAL System Bid released (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/65751-cal-system-bid-released.html)

EWRflyr 03-02-2012 08:12 AM


Originally Posted by A320
Chicago isn't what I want however I'll take a Chicago winter before a Houston summer any day.

I agree with that statement.


Regarding bids I suspect the SCal bids in DEN will go very senior while the SUAL bids in IAH will go relatively junior. I think the TDY A320 IAH flying will go senior.
I'd say DEN will be easily filled.

Actually I think ORD will be easily filled as well....even if by all UAL pilots from the bottom of the list. I cannot believe we will get to a situation for DEN and ORD where we have to volunteer for TDY or have involuntary assignments there. We have how many at the bottom of the CAL seniority list now who are furloughed L-UAL pilots? I would think that if not one CAL pilot bids the 140 positions available at these two bases that 140 UAL pilots at the bottom wouldn't get these positions if they put them on their bid choices.

EWRflyr 03-02-2012 08:17 AM


Originally Posted by Once United
It would be better if nobody(CAL/UAL) took any of these bids and let the company pay to move/house people for a TDY operation. Greed probably won't allow that. We should do what the MEC wouldn't do. Make the company give us a JCBA through our actions.

I agree and luckily for this L-CAL bid there are no displacements anywhere, only vacancies or status quo. The problem we run into with our bids is that if we don't bid sufficient choices we can be assigned as the company needs dictate, which again, would be more of a problem in a displacement scenario.

I'll flat out say right now that I've updated my standing bid screen to show DEN/ORD CA and FO slots as my next to last choices...right above GUM CA/FO. Won't be an issue on this bid, but family obligations rules out GUM for many of us.

UAL SUX 03-02-2012 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by A320 (Post 1144407)
The LCAs should stop VOLUNTEERING to do IOE work until the JCBA is reached. The doesn't violate the court order or the RLA for that matter. This place will grind to a halt

Absolutely true.

Any LCA's on this board care to respond?

UalHvy 03-02-2012 01:39 PM

Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".

Slammer 03-02-2012 02:47 PM


Originally Posted by UalHvy (Post 1144686)
Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".

What do you mean by the " dark side"?

UalHvy 03-02-2012 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by Slammer (Post 1144717)
What do you mean by the " dark side"?

You can't really be that clueless.

SoCentralRain 03-02-2012 07:10 PM


Originally Posted by Slammer (Post 1144717)
What do you mean by the " dark side"?

You have to ask what this means? Really?

Slammer 03-02-2012 10:47 PM


Originally Posted by UalHvy (Post 1144846)
You can't really be that clueless.

Not clueless at all...It was a joke to continue the thought...Relax...

SpecialTracking 03-03-2012 03:49 AM


Originally Posted by UalHvy (Post 1144686)
Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".

Let's be fair now. The LCA's aren't helping the company. They are instead out with the unwashed masses imparting their aviation wisdom saving the industry one grimy line pilot at a time.

Bitter? Nope.

UAL SUX 03-03-2012 08:16 AM

Simple question:
Why are LCA's still volunteering their services?
Answer: Silence.

Simple question I asked 8 years ago:
What is my union doing to save my job?
Answer: Silence.

Welcome to United Airlines - Every man for himself.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands