Search

Notices

UAL Interns, etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2013 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
DC7C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: CW20
Post UAL Interns, etc

Just wondering if the pre-merger practice of Interns, former employees and Sons/daughter at UA will get put in a separate pile for interviews? Seems like the old CO folks are running the hiring these days, just wondering if one of the better bennies for being associated with UAL is still gonna be around? Thoughts? Facts? SWAGs?
Reply
Old 01-12-2013 | 12:08 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by DC7C
Just wondering if the pre-merger practice of Interns, former employees and Sons/daughter at UA will get put in a separate pile for interviews? Seems like the old CO folks are running the hiring these days, just wondering if one of the better bennies for being associated with UAL is still gonna be around? Thoughts? Facts? SWAGs?
Might be the only one but I always thought the best practice would be to hire the most qualified applicant regardless of who someones mother or father might be.
Reply
Old 01-12-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default

I am a former CAL intern, a good friend of mine is a former UAL intern. He was told (by CV) all interns from both groups will be looked at. How they decide I'm not sure, but seems like both will get a fair shot.
Reply
Old 01-12-2013 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DC7C
Just wondering if the pre-merger practice of Interns, former employees and Sons/daughter at UA will get put in a separate pile for interviews? Seems like the old CO folks are running the hiring these days, just wondering if one of the better bennies for being associated with UAL is still gonna be around? Thoughts? Facts? SWAGs?
Word on the street is the first batch of interviews (after the poolies) is being offered to interns, kids of managers, kids of parents who know managers, etc. Not too surprising considering both companies operated that way, IMHO.

I personally have not seen anything official concerning former UA employees like UA used to do.
Reply
Old 01-12-2013 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Im all for hiring the most qualified as long as they can check their ego at the door during the interview.
Reply
Old 01-13-2013 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

"as long as they can check their ego at the door"

It's a miracle any of us got hired then.
Reply
Old 01-13-2013 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
untied's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Might be the only one but I always thought the best practice would be to hire the most qualified applicant regardless of who someones mother or father might be.
UAL hired about 1000 people in 1995. About 100 were interns.

UAL hired about 1000 people in 1997, and I think there were only about 5-10 interns hired.

I was told that UAL regretted picking up some of these kids with low time. Many actually had a really bad attitude and were just too lacking in experience compared to their counterparts.

There is no reason we should interview anyone with less than 4,000 hours (until we run out of applicants during the "pilot shortage").
Reply
Old 01-13-2013 | 03:21 PM
  #8  
voodiloquist's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: 756
Default

Originally Posted by untied
UAL hired about 1000 people in 1995. About 100 were interns.

UAL hired about 1000 people in 1997, and I think there were only about 5-10 interns hired.

I was told that UAL regretted picking up some of these kids with low time. Many actually had a really bad attitude and were just too lacking in experience compared to their counterparts.

There is no reason we should interview anyone with less than 4,000 hours (until we run out of applicants during the "pilot shortage").

...a 1000 fighter guy will suffice
Reply
Old 01-13-2013 | 03:55 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
Default

Are you guys sure flight times are the golden rod? RJs are slowly becoming as large as narrow body airplanes (which I am not in favor of). Some start ups and LCCs hire Fos at around 2500-3000 hours for 737s and A320s with no problems.

Even Atlas and Miami air hire 2000-3000 pilots for 747s and 737s.

Just making a bit of debate, but after about 3000 hours does it really matter, esp in today's career path (ie RJs).

This post is a question, not a comment of my opinion.

Last edited by lakehouse; 01-13-2013 at 04:13 PM.
Reply
Old 01-13-2013 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by voodiloquist
...a 1000 fighter guy will suffice
Without getting into a silly mil-vs-civ debate....

IMHO, having flown with both "low time" pilots (interns or otherwise) and "1000hr fighter guys", it depends more on the individual than the hours in the logbook. 90% of are just fine and it's the other 10% that fill out both ends of the bell curve.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
49
04-04-2012 09:07 AM
Low & Slow
Major
37
08-23-2007 05:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices