Search

Notices

Future Vacancy Bids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2013 | 05:26 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
I'll bet Pierce fought that tooth and nail.
Coto, Why in your opinion would he fight that? Come on? Wasn't Pierce involved with getting the "retreads" over to the CAL side to help your pilots out? Your comment with no explanation kind puts you in the i'm an angry man light.......I'm glad guys are returning to your side of the fence. Maybe then you can worry about whats going on with your own MEC.....
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 05:44 AM
  #42  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Maxepr1
Coto, Why in your opinion would he fight that? Come on? Wasn't Pierce involved with getting the "retreads" over to the CAL side to help your pilots out? Your comment with no explanation kind puts you in the i'm an angry man light.......I'm glad guys are returning to your side of the fence. Maybe then you can worry about whats going on with your own MEC.....
Pierce has done everything he possibly can to attempt to gain an advantage in the SLI, would not agree to a prenup not to include contract negotiations as DA/NW did, insisted on pay banding, would not allow UA pilots flying at CAL to get their first of the month check increased, and most significantly LOA 25. This is just off the top of my head.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 08:07 AM
  #43  
LCAL dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
The career expectations (career earnings) of a currently unemployed pilot who will return as a junior FO for awhile and eventually become a wide body captain for one year starting at 64 vs a pilot who is currently a narrow body captain at 35 and will remain so (or better) for 30 years may not be so different.
Seriously? If someone's a 73 Captain at lCal, they're only a few hundred numbers from being a 756 Captain, and could reasonably expect to hold 756 Captain within 2 years. So your question should be:

"The career expectations (career earnings) of a currently unemployed pilot who will return as a junior FO for awhile and eventually become a wide body captain for one year starting at 64, vs a 35 year old lCal pilot who is currently a narrow body captain and will become a 756 Captain by 40 will be massively different."

Last edited by LCAL dude; 01-26-2013 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 08:32 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
I'm an LCAL pilot and I'm on the side of the "2005 CA who totally agrees." How does someone expect to be anywhere else on the seniority list than about where they are now. But "our planes our bigger than your planes" and "the SLI snapshot should be taken pre furlough" are their two big arguments for getting a windfall from this.
I don't want a windfall. Just a fair integration based on today's Alpa Merger policy. Status and Category, Career Expectations, and Longevity. Not "where they are now" or "relative seniority" or any other made up, APC forum criteria. Lets stick with the rules and let the process work.

the Sled
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 09:48 AM
  #45  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I don't want a windfall. Just a fair integration based on today's Alpa Merger policy. Status and Category, Career Expectations, and Longevity. Not "where they are now" or "relative seniority" or any other made up, APC forum criteria. Lets stick with the rules and let the process work.

the Sled
Agree 100%, the CAL side seems to be afraid of the "new" ALPA policy.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 10:52 AM
  #46  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
Agree 100%, the CAL side seems to be afraid of the "new" ALPA policy.


I think you all should pick up what the Father is laying down in the other thread

"Going forward, is it more important to comment to promote a certain seniority list construct, or is it more important to comment to promote understanding? We certainly won't decide the final list, but we better understand the pilots, sans scabs, that make up that list when we fly with them."
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 11:08 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I don't want a windfall. Just a fair integration based on today's Alpa Merger policy. Status and Category, Career Expectations, and Longevity. Not "where they are now" or "relative seniority" or any other made up, APC forum criteria. Lets stick with the rules and let the process work.

the Sled
You need to get it out of your head that is all the sli is based on. This is items that must be considered WIThOUt and particular weight. The past and many other factors will come into play.

Category-- unemployed

Career expectations-- who knows, maybe one day.

Longevity-- some

So with these factors only you are throwing 1437 under the bus.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 11:53 AM
  #48  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude
Seriously? If someone's a 73 Captain at lCal, they're only a few hundred numbers from being a 756 Captain, and could reasonably expect to hold 756 Captain within 2 years. So your question should be:

"The career expectations (career earnings) of a currently unemployed pilot who will return as a junior FO for awhile and eventually become a wide body captain for one year starting at 64, vs a 35 year old lCal pilot who is currently a narrow body captain and will become a 756 Captain by 40 will be massively different."
Which is all nonsense. You make it sound like all the pilots at CAL are 757 captains. Half are Capts and half are FOs. Just because of big undesirable domiciles like EWR causing guys to stay in the right seat forever and allowing capt to go junior isn't going to be considered. All of my friends at CAL were hired in the late 90s. Guess what? They are all FOs still. They like being senior on the 767 and 777 as FOs. They all tell me they can hold 757 cap but the flying is lousy so they don't upgrade. Same with 737 capt. They all commute and don't want to commute to a lousy narrow body schedule.

If your SLI argument is that your list has more bidding variability and that you should be rewarded, it isn't going to work.

I guess for some pilots at CAL it is a career expectation to have 15 years seniority and be a 767 FO.

So please don't try and convince me or anyone that because a guy with 80% seniority can hold 737 capt that every pilot above that has that expectation, because if they actually bid it, it wouldn't go below 50%.

That's why they didn't look at who sat where when they did DAL NWA. Just what each airline brought in terms of equipment.

What you should do is get all the CAL pilots to intentionally not bid 777 Cap and let it go to the bottom guy on the list, so you can argue that every CAL pilot can hold 777 Cap their entire career.

Really looking forward to the final SLI outcome so we can put this to rest.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #49  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by thor2j
You need to get it out of your head that is all the sli is based on. This is items that must be considered WIThOUt and particular weight. The past and many other factors will come into play.

Category-- unemployed

Career expectations-- who knows, maybe one day.

Longevity-- some

So with these factors only you are throwing 1437 under the bus.
Tell that to the top 400 pilots at UAL. They were all furloughed in the early 80s and all 747 Capts now. So I guess they did have a career expectation.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 12:05 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Tell that to the top 400 pilots at UAL. They were all furloughed in the early 80s and all 747 Capts now. So I guess they did have a career expectation.
Not all of the top 400 at ual were furloughed in the early 80's and they are not all 747 captains.

Geez aren't you the one that kept talking about the happiness once you got you airbus contract passed?

Last edited by syd111; 01-26-2013 at 12:23 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
LeeMat
United
13
05-09-2012 05:56 AM
SNIZ
Cargo
151
09-28-2008 03:12 PM
ERJ135
Regional
44
07-21-2008 06:49 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-11-2005 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices