Search

Notices

Fences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2013 | 03:39 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude
Then you need to turn off your Bose earplugs, lCal pilots are hearing it all the time. Usually from junior Airbus FOs.
We would espouse those beliefs to you but not between ourselves? Are the pilots you speak of promoting DOH/straight longevity or are they interpreting ALPA merger policy? There is a big difference.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 04:37 PM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
And there is no reason for a 8 year pilot to be placed below one with 4 years, especially when the 8 year pilot comes from the airline with the highest career expectations (because of most widebody aircraft by far) and better status and category......

Explain please. Which airline are you defining by highest career expectations?

The word expectation means to expect something. We have career expectations of holding the left seat and continuing to buy more aircraft. You have career expectations of being recalled, parking aircraft, and increasing the size of your domestic RJ fleet. No comparison there.

The size or most of any one aircraft type does not define career expectations. It defines what makes up an airline and types of flying that it does. It does not give any type of status to said pilot group.

It's category is defined by pay and the contract specification, i.e. 767, 737, 787, etc. Flying a widebody gives no more status or career expectations than does flying the smallest aircraft for said airline. If what you say is true, then the seniority list would be the same as DOH and you would never see an FO being senior to a CA.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 04:48 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
Anyone on either side arguing "career expectations" are going to significantly alter the SLI is probably going to be disappointed.
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Exactly.
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
And there is no reason for a 8 year pilot to be placed below one with 4 years, especially when the 8 year pilot comes from the airline with the highest career expectations...

And to those that think that pilots that have been furloughed don't have a career expectation, the top 500 pilots at United were all on furlough at one point, so they certainly had a career expectation.
For a brief moment, the Great Wall of China and the face palm I did after reading that were the only manmade things on Earth visible from space with the naked eye.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 05:03 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
I saw them at Yoshi's Oakland last month. They put on a million-watt show, tighter than a clenched fist.
Good to hear. Hopefully there are one or two original members left. TOP's "So Very Hard To Go" and EWF's "Reasons" were part the soundtrack for the compulsory "grab and grind" portion of every house party I went to in my teens.

They say you fondly remember old music because it came from a good time in your life. I had a blast in the 80s (college... the best eight years of my life), but I still think most of the music sucked. TOP, EWF, and a lot of the stuff from the 60s and 70s is timeless.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 07:54 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
Explain please. Which airline are you defining by highest career expectations?

The word expectation means to expect something. We have career expectations of holding the left seat and continuing to buy more aircraft. You have career expectations of being recalled, parking aircraft, and increasing the size of your domestic RJ fleet. No comparison there.

The size or most of any one aircraft type does not define career expectations. It defines what makes up an airline and types of flying that it does. It does not give any type of status to said pilot group.

It's category is defined by pay and the contract specification, i.e. 767, 737, 787, etc. Flying a widebody gives no more status or career expectations than does flying the smallest aircraft for said airline. If what you say is true, then the seniority list would be the same as DOH and you would never see an FO being senior to a CA.
Don't start talking logic among this group. Bias is skewed too far that they can't see this.
Reply
Old 02-25-2013 | 04:08 AM
  #96  
socalflyboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Default

Originally Posted by Sonny Crockett
Some of those guys have eight (8) years on property. What say you now?
Sonny, I say ...if you have 8 years on property,flying the line or riding the reserve train,you should be placed above the guy with 7 yrs, 11 mos and 30 days. How would one have 8 years if they were hired early 2001? Furloughed oct/nov 2001...recalled summer 2007, then furloughed again in 2008/early 2009.. My math adds up to less than 3 total years jerking gear..not happy about it, but where do you get 8 years?
Reply
Old 02-25-2013 | 04:37 AM
  #97  
Sonny Crockett's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 3
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Sonny, I say ...if you have 8 years on property,flying the line or riding the reserve train,you should be placed above the guy with 7 yrs, 11 mos and 30 days. How would one have 8 years if they were hired early 2001? Furloughed oct/nov 2001...recalled summer 2007, then furloughed again in 2008/early 2009.. My math adds up to less than 3 total years jerking gear..not happy about it, but where do you get 8 years?
I can speak for 1999 guys/gals...hired 8/99 furloughed 8/2003 (4 years) recalled 12/2005 and furloughed again 12/2009 (another 4 years) and a wonderful fun filled 1+year at CAL (another year) total =9.

Don't know about 2001 "hires" maybe someone could speak up.....just want to make sure you do not fall into the whole "you are furloughed so you are getting stapled" so just suck it up and expect to be stapled below the bottom CAL pilot hired in 2008.

Also many of us who were hired in our mid to late 20's have the expectation (just running the numbers even with age 65) we will have a lot of 747/777 left seat capt time by retirement. I came to UAL for widebody flying.


Either way it is going to be an interesting SLI.
Reply
Old 02-25-2013 | 04:44 AM
  #98  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Sonny, I say ...if you have 8 years on property,flying the line or riding the reserve train,you should be placed above the guy with 7 yrs, 11 mos and 30 days. How would one have 8 years if they were hired early 2001? Furloughed oct/nov 2001...recalled summer 2007, then furloughed again in 2008/early 2009.. My math adds up to less than 3 total years jerking gear..not happy about it, but where do you get 8 years?
Not all the x2 furloughess were hired in '01. Take a guy (like Sonny) that was hired in '99, furloughed in '03, recalled in '05 and furloughed again in '09. That's eight years--the majority as a line holder due to the pace of hiring in '99 and recalls in '05. FWIW, there are pilots in that group that have flown every aircraft in the fleet including the 747.
Reply
Old 02-25-2013 | 04:54 AM
  #99  
DontPickIt's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Yes, & on the front Biffy
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
The word expectation means to expect something. We have career expectations of holding the left seat and continuing to buy more aircraft. You have career expectations of being recalled, parking aircraft, and increasing the size of your domestic RJ fleet. No comparison there.
While I applaud your mind set in trying to trample the useless others in attempts to re-bid the airline, I will try to get inside the heads of these "union" types that you are jousting with. Let's see.

I imagine the 1998-2001 new hires at United had career expectations of flying for a profitable company with one of the top international route structures in the world and a fleet of large widebody aircraft and a fleet of extensive little single aisle jets too (like 757's, 737's, etc).

I'm sure in their careers from the late 90's to the early 00's, they might have even carried some future wunderkids going on high school and college trips with their parents who would later solo a mighty CE-152 and even be captains at Continental, hired in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, etc.

Career expectations take on different meanings at different times but by all means, keep up the good work because I like the sound of where all of this is going.
Reply
Old 02-25-2013 | 04:55 AM
  #100  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sonny Crockett
I can speak for 1999 guys/gals...hired 8/99 furloughed 8/2003 (4 years) recalled 12/2005 and furloughed again 12/2009 (another 4 years) and a wonderful fun filled 1+year at CAL (another year) total =9.
=8. Time at LCAL doesn't count in the SLI process as they are new hires and are not recalled pilots, or so I've been told.

Last edited by APC225; 02-25-2013 at 05:07 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OscartheGrouch
Major
1012
11-25-2013 03:55 PM
LocoLizer
Major
114
10-13-2012 10:19 AM
Cactusone
Major
494
04-13-2012 09:43 AM
jetstream11
Regional
304
09-30-2011 09:26 PM
Al Czervik
Hiring News
101
03-11-2011 01:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices