757s to 737s
#91
It really doesn't matter any more ... Like Ben and many others have said, since we now have a UPA, soon will have the award, and shortly have one MEC, unity is much more important than finding an axe to grind .... But ok, if you insist on seeing certain histories as facts to support your view of the world, ok with me. I'll go back to the basics ... If it was your flying, you would be doing it; if your contract protected or gave you that flying, you would be flying it; if your pilots had jobs, they would be flying; if your side had aircraft ordered and delivered; your pilots would be flying them ... It really is that simple ... any other delusional rationalization is just self-fulfilling conspiracy that will never end, and hurt all in the the long run.
I dearly hope the arbs deliver an award that is more unifying than it is polarizing ... But some will never be happy if they continue to live in a past only framed with their perspective ... reality will bite very soon.
I dearly hope the arbs deliver an award that is more unifying than it is polarizing ... But some will never be happy if they continue to live in a past only framed with their perspective ... reality will bite very soon.
100% no.
You don't know me from Adam, but if you look at my brief history online you will find that a) I have changed my mind publicly b) apologized for false information and c) have always used facts with data that I post or link to support my reasoning.
I seek the truth and I pride myself on living a life wherein I work to "put myself in the other guy's shoes".
The SLI will be stovepiped Cat/Stat sorted somehow.
The CAL-MEC delayed the SLI because it benefited them.
The delay hurt UAL pilots.
If the CAL-MEC had simply followed logic we could be ahead of where we are today.
I understand CAL had lots of planes on order.
I understand UAL had been on a declining trend.
I understand we all want what's best for us as individuals.
I don't understand the incredible sense of entitlement CAL pilots show on APC. Not one humble voice supporting logic . . . not one.
If the arbs choose a stovepiped Cat/Stat I hope to God that the CAL posters on APC will come to their senses. We started with 694 planes and now we have 692 planes and CAL got lots of new planes and UAL got zero and that was because:
A) CAL was such a great company it could compete in NY against a combined DAL/NWA.
B) The merger of CAL and UAL made for a viable competitor to the new behemoth that was DAL/NWA.
I have no axe to grind. What I dream of is the day when you or any CAL pilot comes back and says: Cat/Stat was the most logical approach and UAL was a great partner.
I can start by saying I dreamed of the day the merger with CAL would be announced. I believe our combined fleet and route structure has the potential to kick butt, but so far all the CAL pilots I have met on APC want to take away my career expectations because they believe first that their company was going to grow without a merger because they had lots of planes on order and second that UAL was about to collapse if the merger had not occured. I do not believe either and I wait for a single CAL pilot to agree.
Last edited by Sunvox; 07-31-2013 at 05:03 PM.
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Your thinking logical? Oh come on now.... Maybe on that Super ego planet your living on... I'll go with prejudice and out of touch... Cool aide comment was directed at why you think some CAL guys voted yes... Maybe they voted yes to stop YOU from crying in your skirt about all the injustice you've had in your career? Looks like if they did vote that way it didn't work. Their bad. Yes I voted on the contract and guess which way..Hey CD you'll always be crying about something time to order a new skirt from M and H ....
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
You want to blame the UAL side for the contract because of money. Way off point and lack of understanding of what was going on. The CAL side thought by putting the contract out for vote, as written, would fail. This would have given the CAL side time for a bigger grab of Captain seats that belong to UAL pilots. The "YES" vote started time clock for of SLI start and stopped the seat grab and other things from impacting the UAL side. The contract is a POS but as a betting man, I'd bet that half of the "YES" voters were CAL pilots tired of the dealings of their MEC.
#94
Sorry Hoss, I have to ask what 900's have you been flying that are so SEVERELY LIMITED? The one I fly, I'm sure doesn't climb like the 75 and has much higher REF speeds. But, as far as revenue (which I believe is all they or US should care about) I've NEVER been restricted!! Sure it can't go into SNA and you will get to FL370 5 min. before me. However, you need to ask the question, which one makes more money? You may say 757 but I took one of our planes over to one of the MX shops that are doing the window heat mods and he said the 75's that he's worked on the UAL side are being sent to bone yard because it's to costly to bring them up to speed. It will cost more than they are worth. His words not mine. He said one's that are close to break even to fix are being sold to the likes of FEDEX.
It's a guppy and it's a PIG!
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Sled
#96
And here's proof I do have a life.
The first photo is a new fish not yet described in literature that I helped discover and am currently caring for and the second photo is of wild huckleberries that I taught my teenage children to find in the woods today along with a lesson on how to create fire without matches and the third photo is my saltwater aquarium.
Amazingly enough some APC posters do have other lives!


#99
Three years from now we'll suspend service out of SNA due to poor yields. What a shock people would rather fly non stop..
Management will be baffled. Pilots will be negotiating pay and work rule cuts. Seen it all before.
#100
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
100% no. .... I can start by saying I dreamed of the day the merger with CAL would be announced. I believe our combined fleet and route structure has the potential to kick butt, but so far all the CAL pilots I have met on APC want to take away my career expectations because they believe first that their company was going to grow without a merger because they had lots of planes on order and second that UAL was about to collapse if the merger had not occured. I do not believe either and I wait for a single CAL pilot to agree.
Now back to the regularly scheduled re-hashing:
My guess also ... start with a stovepiped Cat/Stat ... how many? I don't know, but propabaly more than 2 and less than 7. Then, instead of a 1 to 1 ratio, I think they will assign placement on a ratio somewhat resembling the total pilot ratio within those brackets (UAL to CAL) and for some of the brackets, they might add a longevity weight via a change to the ratio or a pull and plug ... but who knows except the 3 wise men.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



